Computer assisted knee arthroplasty is here today [4]

British Medical Journal

Volumn 330, Issue 7484, 2005, Pages 197-

  Holt, Graeme ^a   Gregori, A G ^a  

^a HAIRMYRES HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LETTER; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 12444283653     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Gidwani S, Fairbank A. The orthopaedic approach to managing osteoarthritis of the knee. BMJ 2004;329:1220-4. (20 November.)
2. Oberst M, Bersch C, Wurstlin S, Holz U. CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective and randomised study. Unfallchirurg 2003;106:941-8.
3. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2001;87:18-28.
4. Coyte PC, Hawker G, Croxford R, Wright JG. Revision knee replacement in Ontario, Canada. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:773-82.
5. Ritter MA, Paris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Post-operative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 1994;299:153-6.