Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: Do we need CAOS?

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 319-323

  Sikorski, J M ^a   Chauhan, S ^a  

^a HOLLYWOOD PRIVATE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; IMAGING; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TECHNICAL AID;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

EID: 0037397647     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.85B3.14212     Document Type: Review

References (4)

1. Coventry MB. Two-part total knee arthroplasty: evolution and present status. Clin Orthop 1973;145:29-36.
2. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1977;59-A:77-9.
3. Sternlo J-E, Rettrup A, Sandin R. Prophylactic i.m. ephedrine in bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1995;74:517-20.
4. Picard F, Moody J, Jaramaz B, et al. A classification proposal for computer-assisted knee systems. Proceedings of the 4th Annual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. 2000; 89-90.