Two-photon uncaging with fluorescence reporting: Evaluation of the o-hydroxycinnamic platform

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 129, Issue 32, 2007, Pages 9986-9998

  Gagey, Nathalie ^a   Neveu, Pierre ^a   Benbrahim, Chouaha ^a   Goetz, Bernard ^a   Aujard, Isabelle ^a   Baudin, Jean Bernard ^a   Jullien, Ludovic ^a  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; FLUORESCENCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PHOTOLYSIS; PHOTONS; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROSCOPY;

CAGING GROUPS; DESIGNING EFFICIENT; OHYDROXYCINNAMIC PLATFORM; QUANTITATIVE SUBSTRATE;

ORGANIC ACIDS;

COUMARIC ACID; ORTHO COUMARIC ACID; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; FLUORESCENCE; ISOMERIZATION; PHOTOLYSIS; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; STEADY STATE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; ZEBRA FISH;

EID: 34547870514     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0722022     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Xu, C.; Zipfel, W.; Shear, J. B.; Williams, R. M.; Webb, W. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 10763-10768.
2. Cambridge, S. B.; Davis, R. L.; Minden, J. S. Science 1997, 277, 825-828.
3. Furuta, T.; Wang, S. S. H.; Dantzker, J. L.; Dore, T. M.; Bybee, W. J.; Callaway, E. M.; Denk, W.; Tsien, R. Y. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1999, 96, 1193-1200.
4. Ando, H.; Furuta, T.; Tsien, R. Y.; Okamoto, H. Nat. Genet. 2001, 28, 317-325.
5. Momotake, A.; Lindegger, N.; Niggli, E.; Barsotti, R. J.; Ellis-Davies, G. C. R. Nat. Methods 2006, 3, 35-40.
6. Mayer, G.; Heckel, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 4900-4921.
7. Kiskin, N.; Chillingworm, R.; McCray, J. A.; Piston, D.; Ogden, D. Eur. Biophys. J. 2002, 30, 588-604.
8. Lu, M.; Fedoryak, O. D.; Moister, B. R.; Dore, T. M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2119-2122.
9. Gagey, N.; Neveu, P.; Jullien, L. Angew. Chem., Intl. Ed. 2007, 46, 2467-2469.
10. Pillai, V. N. R. Synthesis 1980, 1-26.
11. Bochet, C. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2002, 1, 125-142.
12. Pelliccioli, A. P.; Wirz, J. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2002, 1, 441-458.
13. Hagen, V.; Frings, S.; Bendig, J.; Lorenz, D.; Wiesner, B.; Kaupp, U. B. Angew. Chem., Intl. Ed. 2002, 41, 3625-3628.
14. Turner, A. D.; Pizzo, S. V.; Rozakis, G.; Porter, N. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 244-250.
15. Wang, B. H.; Zheng, A. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1997, 45, 715-718.
16. Li, H.; Yang, J. H.; Porter, N. A. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2005, 169, 289-297.
17. Xu, C.; Webb, W. W. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1996, 13, 481-491.
18. Cogné-Laage, E.; Allemand, J. F.; Ruel, O.; Baudin, J. B.; Croquette, V.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Jullien, L. Chem. - Eur. J. 2004, 10, 1445-1455.
19. Dauben, W. G.; Salem, L.; Turro, N. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1975, 8, 41-54.
20. Burghardt, I.; Cederbaum, L. S.; Hynes, J. T. Faraday Discuss. 2004, 127, 395-411.
21. Burghardt, I.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 11411-11423.
22. Hershfield, R.; Schmir, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 7359-7369.
23. Hershfield, R.; Schmir, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 8032-8040.
24. 1 is here typically two orders of magnitude smaller than in the o-hydroxycinnamate series; see Table 1S) forbidding to rely on the o-aminocinnamic platform to develop an efficient series of photolabile protecting groups for two-photon uncaging applications.
25. Porter, N. A.; Thuring, J. W., H. Li J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7719-7717.
26. Porter, N. A.; Bruhnke, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 7616-7618.
27. Koenigs, P. M.; Faust, B. C.; Porter, N. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9371-9379.
28. Aujard, I.; Benbrahim, C.; Gouget, M.; Ruel, O.; Baudin, J. B.; Neveu, P.; Jullien, L. Chem. - Eur. J. 2006, 12, 6865-6879.
29. To study uncaging with two-photon excitation for the whole series of cinnamates in a same solvent, we had to switch from the acetonitrile/buffer 1:1 (v/v) mixture to pure acetonitrile. Indeed, we observed in the former solvent that the fluorescence traces such as in Figure 3a periodically exhibited plateaus for the most hydrophobic derivatives (noticeably except for Ec which is fairly water-soluble).
30. Zon, L. I.; Peterson, R. T. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2005, 4, 35-44.
31. Brown, E. B.; Shear, J. B.; Adams, S. R.; Tsien, R. Y.; Webb, W. W. Biophys. J. 1999, 76, 489-499.
32. Kiskin, N. I.; Ogden, D. Eur. Biophys. J. 2002, 30, 571-587.
33. In fact, one should also consider here that a caged compound might form a complex with some intracellular components (bilayer, proteins) not located at the laser focus. Then the apparent homogeneization time could be associated to the off-rate of the caged substrate from the complex.
34. Cambridge, S. B.; Geissler, D.; Keller, S.; Curten, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2229-2231.
35. Lin, W.; Albanese, C.; Pestell, R. G.; Lawrence, D. S. Chem. Biol. 2002, 12, 1347-1353.
36. Frugoni, C. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1957, 87, 403-407.
37. Gampp, H.; Maeder, M.; Meyer, C. J.; Zuberbühler, A. D. Talanta 1985, 32, 95-101.
38. Gampp, H.; Maeder, M.; Meyer, C. J.; Zuberbühler, A. D. Talanta 1985, 32, 257-264.
39. Gampp, H.; Maeder, M.; Meyer, C. J.; Zuberbühler, A. D. Talanta 1985, 32, 1133-1139.
40. Gampp, H.; Maeder, M.; Meyer, C. J.; Zuberbühler, A. D. Talanta 1986, 33, 943-951.
41. Demas, J. N.; Crosby, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 991-1024.
42. Wang, P. F.; Jullien, L.; Valeur, B.; Filhol, J. S.; Canceill, J.; Lehn, J. M. New J. Chem. 1996, 20, 895-907.
43. Charier, S.; Meglio, A.; Alcor, D.; Cogné-Laage, E.; Allemand, J. F.; Jullien, L.; Lemarchand, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15491-15505.
44. During the present series of experiments, we observed the formation of holes from focusing the laser beam in the zebrafish embryo at laser powers beyond 15 mW at 750 nm at the sample. We do not think that this detrimental effect results from heat associated with light absorption with residual one-photon excitation at 750 nm followed by nonradiative deexcitation. First, below 5 mW at 750 nm at the sample, water does not lead to any significant heating (see: Schönle, A.; Hell, S. W.; Opt. Lett. 1998, 23, 325-327).
45. In addition, the zebrafish embryo does not contain any significant amount of interfering endogeneous chromophores at that step of development. In particular, we were never able to express GFP under control of a heat-shock promoter by simply focusing the IR laser beam in any targeted cell of an appropriate transgenic embryo. In fact, we estimate that our observation is more probably related to plasma formation that occurs at 10 mW at 750 nm even in pure solvents (see: Sacchi, C. A. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1991, 8, 337-345.
46. Vogel, A.; Noack, J.; Hüttman, G.; Paltauf, G.; App. Phys. B 2005, 85, 1015-1047).
47. Krichevsky, O.; Bonnet, G. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2002, 65, 251-297.
48. I, designate the brightnesses of Z and I, respectively.
49. -1.