Excited-state charge transfer at a conical intersection: Effects of an environment

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 110, Issue 40, 2006, Pages 11411-11423

  Burghardt, Irene ^a   Hynes, James T ^a,b  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONICAL INTERSECTION; DIELECTRIC CONTINUUM; EXCITED STATE CHARGE TRANSFER; RETINAL ISOMERIZATION;

ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; ISOMERIZATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; POLARIZATION; PROTONS; SOLVENTS;

CHARGE TRANSFER;

PROTON; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; ELECTRON;

ELECTRONS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTONS; SOLVENTS;

EID: 33750304287     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp057569c     Document Type: Article

References (116)

1. Koppel, H.; Domcke, W.; Cederbaum, L. S. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1984, 57, 59.
2. Domcke, W.; Stock, G. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1997, 100, 1.
3. Yarkony, D. R. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1996, 68, 985.
4. Yarkony, D. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 18612.
5. Kiessinger, M.; Michl, J. Excited States and Photochemistry of Organic Molecules, VCH: New York, 1995.
6. Michl, J.; Bonačić-Koutecký, V. Electronic Aspects of Organic Photochemistry; Wiley: New York, 1990.
7. Laage, D.; Burghardt, I.; Sommerfeld, T.; Hynes, J. T. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2003, 4, 61.
8. Laage, D.; Burghardt, I.; Sommerfeld, T.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 11271.
9. Burghardt, I.; Laage, D.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 11292.
10. Toniolo, A.; Granucci, G.; Martínez, T. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 3822.
11. Hayashi, S.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Schulten, K. Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 1440.
12. Groenhof, G.; Bouxin-Cademartory, M.; Hess, B.; de Visser, S. P.; Berendsen, H. J. C.; Olivucci, M.; Mark, A. E.; Robb, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4228.
13. Andruniów, T.; Ferré, N.; Olivucci, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 17908.
14. Yamazaki, S.; Kato, S. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 114510.
15. Kühl, A.; Domcke, W. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 263.
16. Cederbaum, L. S.; Gindensperger, E.; Burghardt, I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 113003.
17. Burghardt, I.; Cederbaum, L. S.; Hynes, J. T. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 2004, 127, 395.
18. Garavelli, M.; Celani, P.; Bernardi, F.; Robb, M. A.; Olivucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6891.
19. Ben-Nun, M.; Molnar, F.; Lu, H.; Phillips, J. C.; Martínez, T. J.; Schulten, K. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1998, 110, 447.
20. Hahn, S.; Stock, G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 1146.
21. Worth, G. A.; Meyer, H.-D.; Cederbaum, L. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 3518.
22. Ferretti, A.; Granucci, G.; Lami, A.; Persico, M.; Villani, G. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 5517.
23. Burghardt, I.; Cederbaum, L. S.; Hynes, J. T. Comput. Phys. Comm. 2005, 169, 95.
24. Spezia, R.; Burghardt, I.; Hynes, J. T. Mol. Phys. 2006, 104, 903.
25. Bonačić-Koutecký, V.; Koutecký, J.; Michl. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 170.
26. Song, L.; El-Sayed, M. A.; Lanyi, J. K. Science 1993, 267, 891.
27. Nonella, M.; J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 11379.
28. Heyne, K.; Herbst, J.; Dominguez-Herradon, B.; Alexiev, U.; Diller, R. J. Phys. Chem. 2000, 104, 6053.
29. Toniolo, A.; Olsen, S.; Manohar, L.; Martínez, T. J. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 2004, 127, 149.
30. Vreven, T.; Bernardi, F.; Garavelli, M.; Olivucci, M.; Robb, M. A.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12687.
31. Garavelli, M.; Vreven, T.; Celani, P.; Bernardi, F.; Robb, M. A.; Olivucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1285.
32. González-Luque, R.; Garavelli, M.; Bernardi, F.; Merchán, M.; Robb, M. A.; Olivucci, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 9379.
33. Garavelli, M.; Negri, F.; Olivucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1023.
34. Garavelli, M.; Bernardi, F.; Robb, M. A.; Olivucci, M. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 1999, 463, 59.
35. Molnar, F.; Ben-Nun, M.; Martínez, T. J.; Schulten, K. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2000, 506, 169.
36. Ben-Nun, M.; Molnar, F.; Schulten, K.; Martínez, T. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 1769.
37. Schoenlein, R. W.; Peteanu, L. A.; Mathies, R. A.; Shank, C. V. Science 1991, 254, 412.
38. Schoenlein, R. W.; Peteanu, L. A.; Mathies, R. A.; Shank, C. V. Science 1994, 266, 422.
39. Gai, F.; Hasson, K. C.; McDonald, J. C.; Anfinrud, P. A. Science 1998, 279, 1886.
40. Genick, U. K.; Soltis, S. M.; Kuhn, P.; Canestrelli, I. L.; Getzoff, E. D. Nature (London) 1998, 392, 206.
41. Malaga, N.; Chosrowjan, H.; Taniguchi, S.; Hamada, N.; Tokunaga, F.; Imamoto, Y.; Kataoka, M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 2454.
42. Kandori, H.; Katsuta, Y.; Ito. M.; Sasabe, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2669.
43. Logunov, S. L.; Song, L.; El-Sayed, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 18586.
44. Changenet, P.; Plaza, P.; Martin, M. M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 336, 439.
45. Changenet-Barret, P.; Espagne, A.; Katsonis, N.; Charier, S.; Baudin, J. B.; Jullien, L.; Plaza, P.; Martin, M. M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 365, 285.
46. Zgrablić, G.; Voïtchovsky, K.; Kindermann, M.; Haake, S.; Chergui, M. Biophys. J. 2005, 88, 2779.
47. 105) and the bond selectivity is very pronounced, in contrast to the unspecific isomerization in a solvent.
48. Bonačić-Koutecký, V.; Schöffel, K.; Michl, J. Theor. Chim. Acta 1987, 72, 459.
49. Rohrig, U. F.; Guidoni, L.; Laio, A.; Frank. I.; Rothlisberger, U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15328.
50. Ruiz, D. S.; Cembran, A.; Garavelli, M.; Olivucci, M.; Fuss, W. Photochem. Photobiol. 2002, 76, 622.
51. Bonačić-Koutecký, V.; Köhler, J.; Michl, J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1984, 104, 440.
52. Worth, G. A.; Cederbaum, L. S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 338, 219.
53. Worth, G. A.; Cederbaum, L. S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 348, 477.
54. 61
55. Lee, S.; Hynes, J. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 6853.
56. Lee, S.; Hynes, J. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 6863.
57. Gertner, B. J.; Ando, K.; Bianco, R.; Hynes, J. T. Chem. Phys. 1994, 183, 309.
58. Bianco, R.; i Timoneda, J. J.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. A 1994, 98, 21103.
59. Mathis, J. R.; Kim, H. J.; Hynes, J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8248.
60. 96.100
61. Kim, H. J.; Hynes, J. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 5088.
62. Ando, K.; J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 4585.
63. Hahn, S.; Stock, G. Chem. Phys. 2000, 259, 297.
64. 25-indicates that the orbitals localized on neighboring centers have different energies.
65. 3|AB〉 state is not involved in the processes considered here.
66. Tennyson, J.; Murrell, J. N. Nouv. J. Chim. 1981, 5, 361.
67. Bonačić-Koutecký, V.; Bruckmann, P.; Hiberty, P.; Koutecký, J.; Leforestier, C.; Salem, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1975, 14, 575.
68. Krawczyk, P.; Viel, A.; Manthe, U.; Domcke, W. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 1397.
69. Brooks, B. R.; Schaefer, H. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 307.
70. 25 Ethylene therefore belongs to the "weakly heterosymmetric" class of ref 25. By contrast, the parameter δ takes large values for the PSBs.
71. Cembran, A.; Bernardi, F.; Olivucci, M.; Garavelli, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 6255.
72. Note that a more flexible choice of the diabatic basis - in particular, a basis defined so as to feature well-defined charge properties in the nonadiabatic coupling region while simultaneously coinciding with the adiabatic states at the planar geometry - would entail less restrictions on the validity of the two-state model eq 10.
73. 110 evidence for the key role of the pyramidalization mode has been provided. While the present analysis is restricted to a two-mode model, the model can be readily extended to account for these additional modes.
74. Laage, D.; Thompson, W. H.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 6032.
75. Thompson, J.; Bashford, D.; Noodleman, L.; Getzoff, E. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8186.
76. Weiss, R. M.; Warshel, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 6131.
77. Reference 68 further introduces an r dependence in the coupling which is not taken into account at the present level of the analysis.
78. 114
79. Koppel, H. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 2004, 127, 35.
80. The shift in the CI location entails a corresponding shift in the charge distribution patterns as described in the previous section: Due to the role of the solvent as an additional tuning mode, the pattern of Figures 6-8 is shifted in r but not changed.
81. Atchity, J.; Xantheas, S. S.; Ruedenberg, K. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 1862.
82. Related considerations on the role of CI topology have been addressed in refs 36 and 95.
83. For further discussion of these aspects, see ref 115.
84. Kim, H. J.; Hynes, J. T. J. Photochem. Photobiol.: Chemistry 1997, 105, 337.
85. Benjamin, I.; Barbara, P. F.; Gertner, B. J.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 7557.
86. Ayala, P. Y.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 2314.
87. 23,24
88. 55,56,99,116,84,7 generalized dissipation - i.e., time-dependent frictional effects within a Langevin treatment - needs to be incorporated to fully account for the solvent impact on the reactive process.
89. Ando, K.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 10464.
90. Warshel, A.; Weiss, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 6218.
91. Kierstead, W. P.; Wilson, K. R.; Hynes, J. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 95, 5256.
92. Warshel, A.; Chu, Z. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 9857.
93. Warshel, A.; Chu, Z. T.; Hwang, J.-K. Chem. Phys. 1991, 158, 303.
94. Honig, B.; Nicholls, A. Science 1995, 268, 1144.
95. Toniolo, A.; Ben-Nun, M.; Martínez, T. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 4679.
96. Marcus, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1956, 24, 966.
97. Calef, D. F.; Wolynes, P. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 3387.
98. Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3701.
99. Borgis, D.; Hynes, J. T. Chem. Phys. 1993, 170, 315.
100. Ulstrup, J.; Charge-transfer processes in condensed media; Springer: Berlin, 1979.
101. Fröhlich, H. Adv. Phys. 1954, 3, 325.
102. Carter, E. A.; Hynes, J. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 94, 5961.
103. Maroncelli, M. J. Mol. Liq. 1993, 57, 1.
104. Horng, M. L.; Gardecki, J. A.; Papazyan, A.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 17311.
105. Becker, R. S.; Freedman, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1477.
106. 43.46 These findings contradict the expectation that the electrostatic solvent properties should play an important role. The model developed in the present manuscript should contribute to clarifying these issues.
107. Ohmine, I.; J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 2348.
108. Mestdagh, J. M.; Visticot, J. P.; Elhanine, M.; Soep, B. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 237.
109. 35 However, as shown in Figure 5b, a slight offset from 6 = 90° can also imply a smooth behavior. Note further that ref 35 associates the g vector with a predominant contribution from the CN stretch mode, and only a minor contribution from the CC stretch.
110. Doltsinis, N. L.; Marx, D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 166402.
111. Schenkl, S.; van Mourik, F.; van der Zwan, G.; Haacke, S.; Chergui, M. Science 2005, 309, 917.
112. Huang, J.; Chen, Z.; Lewis, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 3314.
113. Mathies, R.; Stryer, L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1976, 73, 2169.
114. Premvardhan, L. L.; van der Horst, M. A.; Hellingwerf, K. J.; van Grondelle, R. Biophys. J. 2003, 84, 3226.
115. Non-Adiabatic Effects in Chemical Dynamics, General Discussion. Faraday Discuss. 2004, 127, 447.
116. Fonseca, T.; Kim, H. J.; Hynes, J. T. J. Mol. Liq. 1994, 60, 161.