Reactant concentrations from fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with tailored fluorescent probes. An example of local calibration-free pH measurement

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 127, Issue 44, 2005, Pages 15491-15505

  Charier, Sandrine ^a   Meglio, Adrien ^a   Alcor, Damien ^a   Cogné Laage, Emmanuelle ^a   Allemand, Jean François ^a   Jullien, Ludovic ^a   Lemarchand, Annie ^b  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; ELECTRIC EXCITATION; FLUORESCENCE; PH EFFECTS; SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS; TITRATION;

FLUORESCENCE CORRELATION SPECTROSCOPY; KINETIC INFORMATION; REACTIVE SPECIES; TWO-PHOTON EXCITATION;

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS);

FLUORESCENT DYE;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; FLUORESCENCE CORRELATION SPECTROSCOPY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PH; PH MEASUREMENT; PHOTON; PROTON TRANSPORT; THERMODYNAMICS; TITRIMETRY;

EID: 27644487200     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja053909w     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Cantor, C. R.; Schimmel, P. R. Biophysical Chemistry; Part II; Freeman: New York, 1980.
2. Lakowicz, J. R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Plenum Press: New York, 1999.
3. Valeur, B. Molecular Fluorescence Principles and Applications: Wiley VCH: Weinheim, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto, 2002.
4. See, for instance: Draxler, S.; E.L., M.; Lippitsch, M.; Leiner, J.-P. Sens. Actuators, B 1993, 11, 421-424.
5. Diu, B.; Guthmann, C.; Lederer, D.; Roulet, B. Physique Statistique; Hermann: Paris, 1989.
6. Berne, B. J.; Pecora, R. Dynamic Light Scattering with Applications to Chemistry, Biology, and Physics; Dover: Mineola, NY, 2000.
7. van Kampen, N. G. Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, 5th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2004.
8. Magde, D.; Elson, E. L.; Webb, W. W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1972, 11, 705-708.
9. Elson, E. L.; Magde, D. Biopolymers 1974, 13, 1-27.
10. Magde, D.; Elson, E. L.; Webb, W. W. Biopolymers 1974, 13, 29-61.
11. Thompson, N. L. Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy. Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Techniques; Lakowicz, J., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, 1991; Vol. 1, pp 337-410.
12. Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy; Rigler, R., Elson, E. S., Eds.; Springer Series in Chemical Physics; Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001.
13. Elson, E. L. Traffic 2001, 2, 789-796.
14. Chen, Y.; Müller, J.-D.; Eid, J.-S.; Gratton, E. In New Trends in Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Applications to Chemical and Life Sciences; Valeur, B., Brochon, J.-C., Eds.; Springer Series on Fluorescence, Methods and Applications; Springer: Berlin, 2001; pp 277-296.
15. Thompson, N. L.; Lieto, A. M.; Allen, N. W. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2002, 12, 634-641.
16. Krichevsky, O.; Bonnet, G. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2002, 65, 251-297.
17. Hess, S. T.; Huang, S.; Heikal, A. A.; Webb, W. W. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 697-705.
18. Here, we do not consider the situation where at least one reactant is immobilized such as in, for instance: Lieto, A. M.; Cush, R. C.; Thompson, N. L. Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 3294-3302.
19. Widengren, J.; Terry, B.; Rigler, R. Chem. Phys. 1999, 249, 259-271.
20. Lamb, D. C.; Schenk, A.; Röcker, C.; Scalfi-Happ, C.; Nienhaus, G. U. Biophys. J. 2000 79, 1129-1138.
21. Bismuto, E.; Gratton, E.; Lamb, D. C. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 3510-3521.
22. Hom, E. F. Y.; Verkman, A. S. Biophvs. J. 2002, 83, 533-546.
23. Widengren, J.; Rigler, R. J. Fluoresc. 1997, 7, 211S-213S.
24. Widengren, J.; Rigler, R. Cell. Mol. Biol. 1998, 44, 857-879.
25. Haupts, U.; Maiti, S.; Schwille, P.; Webb, W. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 13573-13578.
26. Schwille, P.; Kummer, S.; Heikal, A. A.; Moerner, W. E.; Webb, W. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 151-156.
27. Hess, S. T.; Heikal, A. A.; Webb, W. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 10138-10148.
28. Berland, K. M.; So, P. T. C.; Gratton, E. Biophys. J. 1995, 68, 694-701.
29. Schwille, P.; Haupts, U.; Maiti, S.; Webb, W. W. Biophys. J. 1999, 77, 2251-2265.
30. Gennerich, A.; Schild, D. Biophys. J. 2000, 79, 3294-3306.
31. For a recent reference, see, for instance: Moscovitch, D.; Noivirt, O.; Mezer, A.; Nachliel, E.; Mark, T.; Gutman, M.; Fibich, G. Biophys. J. 2004, 87, 47-57.
32. Förster, T. Z. Elektrochem. 1950, 54, 42-46.
33. (a) Weller, A. Z. Elektrochem. 1952, 56, 662-668.
34. (b) Weller, A.; Z. Phys. Chem. Neue Folge 1955, 3, 238-254.
35. (c) Weller, A. Z. Phys. Chem. Neue Folge 1958, 17, 224-245.
36. Schulman, S. G. Molecular Luminescence Spectroscopy, Methods and Applications; Wiley-Interscience: New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore, 1988; Part 2.
37. Winkler-Oswatitsch, R. W.; Eigen, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1979, 18, 20-49.
38. Charier, S.; Ruel, O.; Baudin, J.-B.; Alcor, D.; Allemand, J.-F.; Meglio, A.; Jullien, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Eng. 2004, 43, 4785-4788.
39. Charier, S.; Ruel, O.; Baudin, J.-B.; Alcor, D.; Allemand, J.-F.; Meglio, A.; Jullien, L.; Valeur, B. Chem. Eur.-J., accepted for publication.
40. ω does not significantly affect G(τ) and cannot be reliably extracted from the fit. See ref 14.
41. Berry, R. S.; Rice, S. A.; Ross, J. Physical Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K., 2000.
42. For a given relative brightness, Q, two different H̄ values give noticeably the same Ξ value; in principle, it should not be possible to extract pH-pK from Ξ without ambiguity. In fact, the constraint on the intensity of fluorescence emission should forbid the observation of the branch attached to pH values significantly departing from pK (vide infra).
43. Koppel, D. E. Phys. Rev. A 1974, 10, 1938-1945.
44. Eigen, M. Angew. Chem. 1963, 75, 489-508.
45. Eigen, M.; Kruse, W.; Maas, G.; de Mayer, L. In Progress in Reaction Kinetics: Porter, G., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, London, Edinburgh, New York, Paris, Frankfurt, 1964, Vol. 2; pp 287-318.
46. Schwille, P.; Meyer-Almes, F.-J.; Rigler, R. Biophys. J. 1997, 72, 1878-1886.
47. Frugoni, C. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1957, 87, 403-407.
48. Here, one here assumes that the solution is dilute enough to neglect the reaction script A signℋ + A ⇌ A + script A signℋ
49. Lemarchand, H.; Guyot, F.; Jousset, L.; Jullien, L. Thermodynamique de la Chimie; Hermann: Paris, 1999.
50. For an illustration of the role of solvent reorganization during a chemical reaction, see, for instance: Laage, D.; Thompson, W. H.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 6032-6046.
51. Cogné-Laage, E.; Allemand, J.-F.; Ruel, O.; Baudin, J.-B.; Croquette, V.; Blanchard-Desce, M.; Jullien, L. Chem.-Eur. J. 2004, 10, 1445-1455.
52. Xu, C.; Webb, W. W. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1996, 13, 481-491.
53. Catalán, J.; Díaz, C.; García-Blanco, F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 575-580.
54. D = 1-10 where the threshold associated to the chemical reaction is at the most visible in the FCS autocorrelation curve.
55. The data are provided by the Waters Company. HPLC Troubleshooting, Neue, U. D., Waters Corporation, www.waters.com.
56. Gampp, H.; Maeder, M.; Meyer, C. J.; Zuberbühler, A. D. Talanta 1985, 32, 95-101.
57. Gampp, H.; Maeder, M.; Meyer, C. J.; Zuberbühler, A. D. Talanta 1985, 32, 257-264.
58. Gampp, H.; Maeder, M.; Meyer, C. J.; Zuberbühler, A. D. Talanta 1985, 32, 1133-1139.
59. Gampp, H.; Maeder, M.; Meyer, C. J.; Zuberbühler, A. D. Talanta 1986, 33, 943-951.
60. Demas, J. N.; Crosby, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 991-1024.
61. Gosse, C.; Boutonne, A.; Aujard, I.; Chami, M.; Kononov, A.; Cogné-Laage, E.; Allemand, J.-F.; Li, J.; Jullien, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 6485-6497.