Strategic compromise a student teacher's design of kindergarten mathematics instruction in a high-stakes testing climate

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 328-347

  Lloyd, Gwendolyn M ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Curriculum; High stakes climate; Mathematics instruction; Social strategies; Student teaching; Urban schools

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547702388     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487107305260     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Apple, M.W. (2007). Ideological success, educational failure? On the politics of No Child Left Behind. Journal of Teacher Education, 58 (2). 108-116.
2. Arbaugh, F., & Brown, C. (2005). Analyzing mathematical tasks: A catalyst for change ? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 499-536.
3. Ball, D.L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers' guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18 (4). 401-423.
4. Barksdale-Ladd, M.A., & Thomas, K.F. (2000). What's at stake in high-stakes testing: Teachers and parents speak out. Journal of Teacher Education, 51 (5). 384-397.
5. Baroody, A.J., & Coslick, R.T. (1998). Fostering children's mathematical power: An investigative approach to K-8 mathematics instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Becker, H.S. (1970). Sociological work. London: Allen Lane.
7. Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8. Berliner, D.C., & Nichols, S.L. (2007). High-stakes testing is putting the nation at risk. Education Week, 26 (27). 36, 48.
9. Boardman, A.G., & Woodruff, A.L. (2004). Teacher change and "high stakes" assessment: What happens to professional development? Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 545-557.
10. Bracey, G.W. (2000). A children's garden no more. Phi Delta Kappan, 81 (9). 712-713.
11. Cimbricz, S. (2002). State-mandated testing and teachers' beliefs and practice [Electronic version]. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10. Retrieved April 22, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n2.html
12. Clift, R.T., & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 309-424). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Corcoran, T. (2003). The use of research evidence in instructional improvement (No. RB 40). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
14. Craig, C.J. (2004). The dragon in school backyards: The influence of mandated testing on school contexts and educators' narrative knowing. Teachers College Record, 106 (6). 1229-1257.
15. Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). From "separate but equal" to "no child left behind": The collision of new standards and old inequalities. In D. Meier & G. Woods (Eds.), Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools (pp. 3-32). Boston: Beacon.
16. Diamond, J.B., & Spillane, J.P. (2004). High-stakes accountability in urban elementary schools: Challenging or reproducing inequality? Teachers College Record, 106 (6). 1145-1176.
17. Dodds, D.A. (1996). The shape of things. Cambridge, MA: Candlewick.
18. Ducharme, E.R., & Ducharme, M.E. (1996). Needed research in teacher education. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E., Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2 nd ed., pp. 1030-1046). New York: Macmillan.
19. Ebby, C.B. (2000). Learning to teach mathematics differently: The interaction between coursework and field-work for preservice teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 69-97.
20. Education Commission of the States. (2004). ECS report to the nation: State implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act, respecting diversity among states. Denver, CO: Author.
21. Edwards, A., & Protheroe, L. (2003). Learning to see in classrooms: What are student teachers learning about teaching and learning while learning to teach in schools ? British Educational Research Journal, 29 (2). 227-242.
22. Elmore, R. (2002). The testing trap. Harvard Magazine, 105 (1). 35.
23. Fennell, F., Ferrini-Mundy, J., Ginsburg, H.P., Greenes, C., Murphy, S., & Tate, W. (1999). Mathematics: The path to math success. Parsippany, NJ: Silver Burdett Ginn.
24. Frykholm, J.A. (2005). Innovative curricula: Catalysts for reform in mathematics teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 26 (4). 20-36.
25. Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290-294.
26. Hess, R., & Finn, C. (Eds.). (2004). Leaving no child behind: Options for kids in failing schools. Cambridge, MA: Palgrave Macmillan.
27. Hoff, D.J., & Manzo, K.K. (2007). Bush claims about NCLB questioned. Education Week, 26 (27). 1, 26-27.
28. Johnson, S.M., Kardos, S.M., Kauffman, D., Liu, E., & Donaldson, M.L. (2004). The support gap: New teachers' early experiences in high-income and low-income schools [Electronic version]. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12. Retrieved January 4, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n61/
29. Kauffman, D. (2002, April 1-5). A search for support: Beginning elementary teachers' use of mathematics curriculum materials. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
30. Kauffman, D., Johnson, S.M., Kardos, S.M., Liu, E., & Peske, H.G. (2002). " Lost at sea": New teachers' experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104 (2). 273-300.
31. Labaree, D.F. (2005). Life on the margins. Journal of Teacher Education, 56 (3). 186-191.
32. Lacey, C. (1977). The socialization of teachers. London: Methuen.
33. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 465-491.
34. Ladson-Billings, G. (1997). It doesn't add up: African American students' mathematical achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28 (6). 697-708.
35. Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 899-916.
36. LeCompte, M.D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2 nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic.
37. Liston, D., Whitcomb, J., & Borko, H. (2007). NCLB and scientifically-based research: Opportunities lost and found. Journal of Teacher Education, 58 (2). 99-107.
38. Lloyd, G.M. (2006). Using K-12 mathematics curriculum materials in preservice teacher education: Rationale, strategies, and teachers' experiences. In K. Lynch-Davis & R. Rider (Eds.), The work of mathematics teacher educators: Continuing the conversation (Vol. 3, pp. 11-28). San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educator s.
39. Lloyd, G.M., & Behm, S.L. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers' analysis of mathematics instructional materials. Action in Teacher Education, 26 (4). 48-62.
40. Madaus, G.F., West, M.M., Harmon, M.C., Lomax, R.G., & Viator, K.A. (1992). The influence of testing on math and science in grades 4-12. Boston: Boston College, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy.
41. McNeil, L.M. (2000). Creating new inequalities: Contradictions of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81 (10). 728-735.
42. Meier, D., & Wood, G. (Eds.). (2004). Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools. Boston: Beacon.
43. Muller, C., & Schiller, K. (2000). Leveling the playing field? Students' educational attainment and states' performance testing. Sociology of Education, 73, 196-218.
44. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
45. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
46. National Research Council. (2002). Curriculum as a channel of influence: What shapes what is taught to whom ? In I. R. Weiss, M. S. Knapp, K. S. Hollweg, & G. Burrill (Eds.), Investigating the influence of standards: A framework for research in mathematics, science, and technology education (pp. 39-47). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110. (2002).
48. Pedulla, J.J., Abrams, L.M., Madaus, G.F., Russell, M.K., Ramos, M.A., & Miao, J. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Boston: Boston College, National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy.
49. Remillard, J.T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75 (2). 211-246.
50. Remillard, J.T., & Bryans, M.B. (2004). Teachers' orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35 (5). 352-388.
51. Rothman, R., Slattery, J.B., Vranek, J.L., & Resnick, L.B. (2002). Benchmarking and alignment of standards and testing (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 566). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
52. Schoenfeld, A.H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31 (1). 13-25.
53. Selwyn, D. (2007). Highly quantified teachers: NCLB and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58 (2). 124-137.
54. Sikes, P.J., Measor, L., & Woods, P. (1985). Teacher careers: crises and continuities. Lewes, UK: Falmer.
55. Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L.S., Moore, C., Jackson, A.Y., & Fry, P.G. (2004). Tensions in learning to teach: Accommodation and the development of a teaching identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55 (1). 8-24.
56. Smith, M.L. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20 (5). 8-11.
57. Sosniak, L.A., & Stodolsky, S.S. (1993). Teachers and textbooks: Materials use in four fourth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 93 (3). 249-275.
58. Spillane, J.P. (2000). A fifth-grade teacher's reconstruction of mathematics and literacy teaching: Exploring interactions among identity, learning, and subject matter. Elementary School Journal, 100 (4). 307-330.
59. Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Strauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61. Sutton, R.E. (2004). Teaching under high-stakes testing: Dilemmas and decisions of a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education, 55 (5). 463-475.
62. Tate, W. (1995). Returning to the root: A culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34 (3). 166-173.
63. Tate, W. (2001). Science education as a civil right: Urban schools and opportunity-to-learn considerations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (9). 1015-1028.
64. Twiselton, S. (2000). Seeing the wood for the trees: The national literacy strategy and initial teacher education; pedagogical content knowledge and the structure of subjects. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30 (3). 391-403.
65. University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. (2001). Everyday mathematics. Chicago: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
66. Walsh, K. (2007). Becoming part of the solution, not part of the problem. Journal of Teacher Education, 58 (2). 117-123.
67. Woods, P.E. (1979). The divided school. London: Routledge.
68. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69. Zeichner, K.M., & Tabachnick, B.R. (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education washed out by school experiences? Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 7-11.