Science education as a civil right: Urban schools and opportunity-to-learn considerations

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 38, Issue 9, 2001, Pages 1015-1028

  Tate, William ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035504488     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.1045     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bell, D. (1987). And we are not saved: The elusive quest for racial justice. New York: Basic Books.
2. Brown v. Board of Education. 347. U.S. 483 (1954).
3. Bush, G.W. (2001). No child left behind. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
4. Campbell, J.R., Hombo, C.M., & Mazzeo, J. (2000). NAEP 1999 trends in academic progress (NCES 2000-469). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
5. Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
6. Coalition to Save our Children v. State Board of Education. 901 F. Supp. 784 (D. Del. 1995).
7. Crenshaw, K.W. (1988). Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in anti-discrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101, 1331-1387.
8. Dallas Public Schools. (2000). Final report: Districtwide science instruction 1999-2000 (REISOO-149-2). Dallas, TX: Division of Evaluation, Accountability, and Information Systems.
9. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence (Document R-99-1). Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
10. El Nasser, H. (2001, June 22). Big burbs rival central cities. USA Today, p. A.11.
11. D.L. Gabel (Ed.). (1994). Handbook of research in science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
12. Grant, S.G. (1998). Reforming reading, writing, and mathematics: Teachers' responses and the prospects for systemic reform. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Green, P. (1999). Separate and still unequal: Legal challenges to school tracking and ability grouping in America's public schools. In L. Parker D. Deyhle, & S. Villeras (Eds.)., Race is . . . Race isn't: Critical race theory and qualitative studies in education, (pp. 231-250) Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
14. H. Hill, & J.E. Jones (Eds.). (1993). Race in America: The struggle for equality. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
15. Hopson v. Hansen, 265 F. Supp. 902 (D.D.C., 1967).
16. Hurd, P.D. (1997). Inventing science education for the new millennium. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. T. Husén (Ed.). (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries. New York: Wiley.
18. J.J. Johnson & R. Asera (Eds.) (1999). Hope for urban education: A study of nine high-performing, high-poverty, urban elementary schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service.
19. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown.
20. Linden, G.M. (1995). Desegregating schools in Dallas; Four decades in the federal courts. Dallas: Three Folks.
21. Madaus, G.F., West, M.M., Harmon, M.C., Lomax, R.G., & Viator, K.A. (1992). The influence of testing on math and science in grades 4-12. Boston: Boston College, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy.
22. Montgomery v. Starkville. 665 F. Supp. 487 (N.D. Miss. 1987).
23. Moses v. Washington Parish School Board. 409 U.S. 1013 (1972).
24. Moses, R.P., & Cobb, C.E. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon.
25. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
26. National Governors' Association. (1993). The debate on opportunity-to-learn standards. Washington, DC: Author.
27. Oakes, J. (1990). Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics. In C.B. Cazden (Ed.) Review of research in education, 16, 153-222.
28. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. (1992). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes, and meanings. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570-608) New York: Macmillan.
29. Orsak, G. (2000, April 11). Children should learn about engineering. Dallas Morning News: p. 13A.
30. People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education., 851 F. Supp. 905 (N.D. IL. 1994).
31. Quarles v. Oxford Municipal Separate School, 868 F. 2d 750 (Ct. App. 1989).
32. Roberts v. City of Boston, 59 mass. (5 Cush.) 198 (1850).
33. Rury, J., & Mirel, J. (1997). The political economy of urban education. In M.W. Apple, (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 49-110) Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
34. Simmons v. Hooks, 843 F. Supp. 1296 (E.D. Ark. 1994).
35. Shepard, L. A., & Dougherty, K.C. (1991 April) Effects of high-stakes testing on instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association and the National Council of Measurement, Chicago.
36. Strickland, D.S., & Ascher, C. (1992). Low income African-American children and public schooling. In P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 609-625). New York: Macmillan.
37. Tate, W.F., Ladson-Billings, G., & Grant, C.A. (1993). The Brown decision revisited: Mathematizing social problems. Educational Policy, 7, 255-275.
38. Vasquez v. San Jose Unified School District, No. C-71-21320, unpublished stipulation (N.D. 1994).
39. Walters, R. (2000, October 12). The Gore/Bush records on higher education. Black issues higher education, 17, 22-25.