Teacher change and "high-stakes" assessment: What happens to professional development?

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 545-557

  Boardman, Alison Gould ^a,b   Woodruff, Althea L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043051615     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ball D. Reflections and deflections of policy: The case of carol turner Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12 3 1990 241-245
2. Borko H. Davinroy K.H. Bliem C.L. Cumbo K.B. Exploring and supporting teacher change: Two third-grade teachers' experiences in a mathematics and literacy staff development project Elementary School Journal 100 4 2000 273-306
3. Cohen D. A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12 3 1990 311-344
4. Coleman, M., Boardman, A. G., Woodruff, A. L., & Vaughn, S. (2004). A comparison of professional development approaches to learning a new instructional practice. Manuscript submitted for publication
5. Council of Chief State School Officers. (2000). Stated Education Assessment Center, State Student Assessment Programs Database, 1997-1998 school year. Available: http://nces.ed.gov
6. Falk B. Standards-based reforms: Problems and possibilities Phi Delta Kappan 83 8 2002 612-620
7. Garet M.S. Birman B.F. Porter A.C. Desimone L. Herman R. Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program 1999 American Institutes for Research Washington, DC
8. Garet M.S. Porter A.C. Desimone L. Birman B.F. Yoon K.S. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers American Educational Research Journal 38 4 2001 915-945
9. Gersten R. Vaughn S. Deshler D. Schiller E. What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice Journal of Learning Disabilities 30 5 1997 466-476
10. Haladyna T. Nolen S.B. Haas N.S. Raising standardized achievement test scores and the origins of test score pollution Educational Researcher 20 1991 2-7
11. Hiebert J. Relationships between research and the NCTM standards Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30 1 1999 3-19
12. Klingner J. Vaughn S. Schumm J.S. Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogenous fourth-grade classrooms The Elementary School Journal 99 1 1998 3-22
13. Klingner J. Vaughn S. Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition through collaborative strategic reading (CSR) The Reading Teacher 52 7 1999 738-747
14. Lincoln Y.S. Guba E.G. Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic inquiry 1985 Sage Thousand Oaks, CA
15. Madaus G.F. Tan A.G.A. The growth of assessment in: Cawelti G. ed. Challenges and achievements of American education 1993 53-79 Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Alexandria, VA
16. McNeil L.M. Creating new inequalities: Contradictions of reform Phi Delta Kappan 81 10 2000 728-735
17. Miles M.B. Huberman A.M. Qualitative analysis: An expanded sourcebook 1994 Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA
18. Moore W.P. The devaluation of standardized testing: One district's response to a mandated assessment Applied Measurement in Education 7 4 1994 343-367
19. Richardson, V. (2001). Teacher change. In: V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association
20. Showers B. Joyce B. Bennett B. Synthesis of research on staff development: A framework for future study and a state-of-the-art analysis Educational Leadership 45 3 1987 77-87
21. Smith M.L. Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers Educational Researcher 20 5 1991 8-11
22. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
23. Urdan T.C. Paris S.G. Teachers' perceptions of standardized achievement tests Educational Policy 8 2 1994 137-156
24. US Congress. (2001). No child left behind act of 2001. Washington, DC: Author