Action-effect coupling in pianists

Psychological Research

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 233-241

  Drost, Ulrich C ^a   Rieger, Martina ^a   Brass, Marcel ^a   Gunter, Thomas C ^a   Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSIC; PHOTOSTIMULATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; MUSIC; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 15544362247     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-004-0175-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Allard, F., Deakin, J., Parker, S., & Rodgers, W. (1993). Declarative knowledge in skilled motor performance: Byproduct or constituent? In J. L. Starkes & F. Allard (Eds.), Cognitive issues in motor expertise (Vol. 102, pp. 95-107). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
2. Bangert, M., & Altenmüller, E. O. (2003). Mapping perception to action in piano practice: a longitudinal DC-EEG study. BMC Neuroscience, 4, 26-36.
3. Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44, 124-143.
4. Chaffin, R., & Imreh, G. (2002). Practicing perfection: Piano performance as expert memory. Psychological Science, 13, 342-349.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
7. Elsner, B., Hommel, B., Mentschel, C., Drzezga, A., Prinz, W., Conrad, B., & Siebner, H. (2002). Linking actions and their perceivable consequences in the human brain. Neuroimage, 17, 364-372.
8. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
9. Haueisen, J., & Knösche, T. R. (2001). Involuntary motor activity in pianists evoked by music perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 786-792.
10. Koch, I., & Kunde, W. (2002). Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1297-1303.
11. Kornblum, S., & Lee, J. W. (1995). Stimulus response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 855-875.
12. Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 387-394.
13. Nakada, T., Fujii, Y., Suzuki, K., & Kwee, I. L. (1998). 'Musical brain' revealed by high-field (3 Tesla) functional MRI. Neuroreport, 9, 3853-3856.
14. Palmer, C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 115-138.
15. Palmer, C., & Meyer, R. K. (2000). Conceptual and motor learning in music performance. Psychological Science, 11, 63-68.
16. Schon, D., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., & Besson, M. (2002). An fMRI study of music sight-reading. Neuroreport, 13, 2285-2289.
17. Segalowitz, S. J., Bebout, L. J., & Lederman, S. J. (1979). Lateralization for reading musical chords: disentangling symbolic, analytic, and phonological aspects of reading. Brain & Language, 8, 315-323.
18. Sloboda, J. A. (2000). Individual differences in music performance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 397-403.
19. Stürmer, B., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2000). Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study of imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1746-1759.