Using cognitive tools in gStudy to investigate how study activities covary with achievement goals

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 339-358

  Nesbit, John C ^a   Winne, Philip H ^a   Jamieson Noel, Dianne ^a   Code, Jillianne ^a   Zhou, Mingming ^a   Macallister, Ken ^a   Bratt, Sharon ^a   Wang, Wei ^a   Hadwin, Allyson ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547445175     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/H3W1-8321-1260-1443     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., & Chili, M.-H. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
2. Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40, 117-128.
3. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
4. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
5. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
6. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 549-563.
7. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A., (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
8. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A. & Gable, S. L. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549-563.
9. Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 325-346.
10. Foos, P. W. (1995). The effect of variations in text summarization opportunities on test performance. Journal of Experimental Education, 63, 89-95.
11. Gorrell, J., Tricou, C., & Graham, A. (1991). Children's short- and long-term retention, of science concepts via self-generated examples. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 5, 100-108.
12. Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (1996). Study strategies have meager support: A review with recommendations for implementation. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 692-715.
13. Harackiewicz, J. M., Baron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316-330.
14. Huffman, L. E., & Spires, H. A. (1994). Effects of explicit instruction in notetaking on sixth graders' lecture comprehension and attitudes toward notetaking. Reading Improvement, 31, 72-76
15. Igo, L. B., Bruning, R., & McCrudden, M. T. (2005). Exploring differences in students' copy-and-paste decision making and processing: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 103-116.
16. Jamieson-Noel, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (2003). Comparing self-reports to traces of studying behavior as representations of students' studying and achievement. German Journal of Educational Psychology [Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie], 17, 159-171.
17. Kierwa, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Notetaking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240-245.
18. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
19. Marxen, D. E. (1996). Why reading and underlining a passage is a less effective strategy than simply rereading the passage. Reading Improvement, 33, 88-96.
20. Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357-371.
21. Nussbaum, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Argument, and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 384-395.
22. Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. In P. R. Pintrich (Ed.), Understanding self-regulated learning (pp. 3-12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego: Academic Press.
24. Ravindran, B., Greene, B. A., & DeBacker, T. K. (2005). Predicting preservice teachers' cognitive engagement with goals and epistemological beliefs. Journal of Educational Research, 98, 222-232.
25. Schraw, G., Horn, C., Thorndike-Christ, T., & Bruning, R. (1995). Academic goal orientations and student classroom achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 359-368.
26. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
27. Winne, P. H. (1992). State-of-the-art instructional computing systems that afford instruction and bootstrap research. In M. Jones & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Adaptive learning environments: Foundations and frontiers (pp. 349-380). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
28. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Winne, P. H. (2006). How software technologies can improve research on. learning and bolster school reform. Educational Psychologist, 41, 5-17.
30. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2002). Exploring students' calibration of self-reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 551-572.
32. Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2003). Self-regulating studying by objectives for learning: Students' reports compared to a model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 259-276.
33. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
34. Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., Nesbit, J. C., Kumar, V., & Beaudoin, L. (2005). gStudy: A toolkit for developing computer-supported tutorials and researching learning strategies and instruction (version 2.0) [computer program]. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC.
35. Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D. L., & Muis, K. (2002). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies, and self-regulated learning. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: New directions in measures and methods (Vol. 12, pp. 121-155). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
36. Woolfolk, A. E., Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2003). Educational psychology (2nd Canadian ed.). Toronto, ON: Pearson.
37. Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.