Exploring differences in students' copy-and-paste decision making and processing: A mixed-methods study

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 103-116

  Igo, L Brent ^a   McCrudden, Matthew T ^b   Bruning, Roger ^c  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844283712     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.103     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson, T. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1984). Studying. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 657-680). Longman: New York.
2. Barnett, J. E., DiVesta, F. J., & Rogozinski, J. T. (1981). What is learned in note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 181-192.
3. Benton, S. L., Glover, J. A., Monkowski, P. G., & Shaughnessy, M. (1983). Decision difficulty in recall of prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 727-742.
4. Blanchard, J. S. (1985). What to tell students about underlining ... and why. Journal of Reading, 29, 199-203.
5. Bretzing, B. B., & Kulhavey, R. W. (1981). Note taking and passage style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 242-250.
6. Carter, J. F., & Van Matre, N. H. (1975). Note taking versus note having. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 900-904.
7. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reiman, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
8. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
9. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
10. Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effects of note taking and review on recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 321-325.
11. Glover, J. A., Plake, B. S., & Zimmer, J. W. (1982). Distinctiveness of encoding and memory for learning tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 189-198.
12. Golding, J. M., & Fowler, S. B. (1992). The limited facilitative effect of typographical signals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 99-113.
13. Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56, 473-493.
14. Huffman, L. E., & Spires, H. A. (1994). Effects of explicit instruction in note taking on sixth graders' lecture comprehension and attitudes toward note taking. Reading Improvement, 11, 72-76.
15. Igo, L. B., Bruning, R. B., McCrudden, M., & Kauffman, D. F. (2003). InfoGather: Six experiments toward the development of an online, data-gathering tool. In R. Bruning, C. A. Horn, & L. M. Pytlik-Zillig (Eds.), Web-based learning: What do we know? Where do we go? (pp. 57-77). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
16. Jacoby, L. L., & Craik, F. I. M. (1979). Effects of elaboration of processing at encoding and retrieval: Trace distinctiveness and recovery of initial content. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing and human memory (pp. 1-22). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Johnson, L. L. (1988). Effects of underlining textbook sentences on passage and sentence recall. Reading Research and Instruction, 28, 18-32.
18. Kiewra, K., Dubois, N., Christain, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240-245.
19. Kintsch, W. (1974). The representations of meaning is memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Kook, J. K. (1997). Computers and communications networks in educa tional settings in the twenty-first century: Preparations for educator's new roles. Educational Technology, 38, 56-60.
21. Marxen, D. E. (1996). Why reading and underlining a passage is a less effective strategy than simply rereading the passage. Reading Improvement, 33, 88-96.
22. Mayer, R. R. (2002). The promise of educational psychology: Vol. 2. Teaching for meaningful learning. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
23. McAndrew, D. A. (1983). Underlining and note-taking: Some suggestions from research. Journal of Reading, 27, 103-108.
24. McKeown, M., Crowley, K., Forman, E. A., & O'Connor, R. (2002). Editorial statement. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 99-100.
25. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Newman, I., & Benz, C. R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
27. Peck, K. L., & Hannafm, M. J. (1983). The effects of note-taking pretraining and the recording of notes on the retention of aural instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 100-106.
28. Peters, D. L. (1972). Effects of note taking and rate of presentation on short-term objective test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 276-280.
29. Peterson, S. E. (1992). The cognitive functions of underlining as a study technique. Reading Research and Instruction, 31, 49-56.
30. Rickards, J. P., & Divesta, F. J. (1974). Type and frequency of questions in processing textual material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 354-362.
31. Rickards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F., & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, note taking, and field independence-dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 508-517.
32. Rickards, J. P., & Friedman, F. (1978). The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 136-143.
33. Rinehart, S. D., & Thomas, K. A. (1993). Summarization ability and text recall by novice studiers. Reading Research and Instruction, 32, 24-32.
34. Schellings, G. L. M., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (1995). Main points in an instructional text, as identified by students and by their teachers. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 742-756.
35. Slotte, V., & Lonka, K. (1999). Review and process effects of spontaneous note-taking on text comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 1-20.
36. Spiegel, G. F., & Barafaldi, J. P. (1994). The effects of a contribution of text structure awareness and graphic postorganizers on recall and retention of science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 913-932.
37. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Teddlie, C., Kirby, P., & Stringfield, S. (1989). Effective versus ineffective schools: Observable differences in the classroom, American Journal of Education, 97, 221-236.
39. Wade, S. E., & Trathen, W. (1989). Effect of self-selected study methods on learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 40-47.