Verifying visual properties in sentence verification facilitates picture recognition memory

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 173-179

  Pecher, Diane ^a   Zanolie, Kiki ^a   Zeelenberg, René ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Concepts; Embodied cognition; Recognition memory; Representation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MEMORY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; VISION;

COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MEMORY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34547286409     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.3.173     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson, R.C., Pichert, J.W., Goetz, E.T., Schauert, D.L., Stevens, K.V., & Trollip, S.R. (1976). Instantiation of general terms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 667-679.
2. Borghi, A.M., Glenberg, A.M., & Kaschak, M.P. (2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory and Cognition, 32, 863-873.
3. Barclay, J.R., Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J., McCarrell, N.S., & Nitsch, K. (1974). Comprehension and semantic flexibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 471-481.
4. Barsalou, L.W. (1993). Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A.F. Collins, S.E. Gathercole, M.A. Conway, & P.E. Morris (Eds.) Theories of memory (pp. 30-39). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
5. Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
6. Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Meot, A., & Chalard, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of ac quisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 158-167.
7. Borghi, A.M. (2005). Object concepts and action. In D. Pecher & R.A. Zwaan (Eds.), The grounding of cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 8-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Borghi, A.M., Glenberg, A.M., & Kaschak, M.P. (2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory and Cognition, 32, 863-873
9. Criss, A.H., & Shiffrin, R.M. (2004). Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory. A Comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review, 111, 800-807.
10. Durgunoǧlu, A.Y., & Roediger, H.L. (1987). Test differences in accessing bilingual memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 377-391.
11. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 1-11.
12. Glenberg, A.M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
13. Glenberg, A.M., & Kaschak, M.P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 558-565.
14. Goldstone, R.L., & Barsalou, L.W. (1998). Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition, 65, 231-262.
15. Kazmerski, V.A., & Friedman, D. (1997). Old/new differences in direct and indirect memory tests using pictures and words in within- and cross-form conditions: Event-related potential and behavioral measures. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 255-272.
16. MacMillan, N.A., & Creelman, C.D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Marques, J.F. (2006). Specialization and semantic organization: Evidence for multiple-semantics linked to sensory modalities. Memory and Cognition, 34, 60-67.
18. Morris, D.C., Bransford, J.D., & Franks, J.J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
19. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L.W. (2003). Verifying conceptual properties in different modalities produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119-124.
20. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L.W. (2004). Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 164-167.
21. Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253-336.
22. Richardson, D.C., Spivey, M.J., Barsalou, L.W., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767-780.
23. Spence, C., Nicholls, M.R., & Driver, J. (2001). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 330-336.
24. Stanfield, R.A., & Zwaan, R.A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153-156.
25. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625-636.
26. Zeelenberg, R., Pecher, D., Shiffrin, R.M., & Raaijmakers, J.G.W. (2003). Semantic context effects and priming in word association. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 653-660.
27. Zwaan, R.A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B.H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 35-62). New York: Academic Press.
28. Zwaan, R.A., & Madden, C.J. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In D. Pecher & R.A. Zwaan (Eds.), The grounding of cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Zwaan, R.A., Stanfield, R.A., & Yaxley, R.H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168-171.