Semantic context effects and priming in word association

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 653-660

  Zeelenberg, René ^a,c   Pecher, Diane ^b   Shiffrin, Richard M ^c   Raaijmakers, Jeroen G W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346271912     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196528     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BARSALOU, L. W. (1993). Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A. C. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway, & P. E. M. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 29-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. BERGERBEST, D., & GOSHEN-GOTTSTEIN, Y. (2002). The origins of levels-of-procesing effects in a conceptual test: Evidence for automatic influences of memory from the process-dissociation procedure. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1252-1262.
3. BLAXTON, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 657-668.
4. GERNSBACHER, M. A., ROBERTSON, R. R. W., & WERNER, N. K. (2002). The costs and benefits of meaning. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 119-137). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. GORFEIN, D. S., BERGER, S., & BUBKA, A. (2000). The selection of homograph meaning: Word association when context changes. Memory & Cognition, 28, 766-773.
6. GOSHEN-GOTTSTEIN, Y., & KEMPINSKY, H. (2001). Probing memory with conceptual cues at multiple retention intervals: A comparison of forgetting rates on implicit and explicit tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 139-146.
7. HUMPHREYS, M. S., BAIN, J. D., & PIKE, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208-233.
8. HUMPHREYS, M. S., TEHAN, G., O'SHEA, A., & BOLAND, S. W. (2000). Target similarity effects: Support for the parallel distributed processing assumptions. Memory & Cognition, 28, 798-811.
9. LIGHT, L. L., & CARTER-SOBELL, L. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9, 1-11.
10. MARCHAL, A., & NICOLAS, S. (2001). The orthographic distinctiveness effect in explicit and implicit memory. Poster presented at the Third International Conference on Memory, Valencia, Spain.
11. McKOON, G., & RATCLIFF, R. (1995). Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 527-533.
12. MORRIS, D. C., BRANSFORD, J. D., & FRANKS, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
13. MULLIGAN, N. W. (1998). The role of attention during encoding on implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 27-47.
14. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2002). The effects of generation on conceptual implicit memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 327-342.
15. MULLIGAN, N. W., GUYER, P. S., & BELAND, A. (1999). The effects of levels-of-processing and organization on conceptual implicit memory in the category exemplar production test. Memory & Cognition, 27, 633-647.
16. MULLIGAN, N. W., & STONE, M. (1999). Attention and conceptual priming: Limits on the effects of divided attention in the category-exemplar production task. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 253-280.
17. NELSON, D. L., BENNETT, D. J., & XU, J. (1997). Recollective and automatic uses of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 872-885.
18. NELSON, D. L., & GOODMON, L. B. (2002). Experiencing a word can prime its accessibility and its associative connections to related words. Memory & Cognition, 30, 380-398.
19. NELSON, D. L., McEVOY, C. L., & SCHREIBER, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme and word fragment norms. Available at http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
20. PECHER, D., ZEELENBERG, R., & RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W. (1998). Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 401-418.
21. POLLATSEK, A., & WELL, A. D. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 785-794.
22. RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W., SCHRIJNEMAKERS, J. M. C., & GREMMEN, F. (1999). How to deal with the "language-as-a-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 416-426.
23. RAPPOLD, V. A., & HASHTROUDI, S. (1991). Does organization improve priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 103-114.
24. ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
25. ROEDIOER, H. L., III, & ADELSON, B. (1980). Semantic specificity in cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 8, 65-74.
26. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & McDERMOTT, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boiler & J. Grafman (Series Eds.) and H. Spinnler & F. Boiler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology: Vol. 8. Section 11: Memory, dementia, perception of time, music and faces (pp. 63-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27. SHELTON, J. R., & MARTIN, R. C. (1992). How semantic is automatic semantic priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1191-1210.
28. SHIMAMURA, A. P., & SQUIRE, L. R. (1984). Paired-associate learning and priming in amnesia: A neuropsychological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 556-570.
29. TWILLEY, L. C., DIXON, P., TAYLOR, D., & CLARK, K. (1994). University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs. Memory & Cognition, 22, 111-126.
30. VAIDYA, C. J., GABRIELI, J. D. E., KEANE,. M. M., & MONTI, L. A. (1995). Perceptual and conceptual memory processes in global amnesia. Neuropsychology, 9, 580-591.
31. VAIDYA, C. J., GABRIELI, J. D. E., KEANE, M. M., MONTI, L. A., GUTIÉRREZ-RIVAS, H., & ZARELLA, M. M. (1997). Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1324-1343.
32. VRIEZEN, E. R., MOSCOVITCH, M., & BELLOS, S. A. (1995). Priming effects in semantic classification tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 933-946.
33. WELDON, M. S., & COYOTE, K. C. (1996). Failure to find the word picture superiority effect in implicit conceptual memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 670-686.
34. ZEELENBERG, R. (1998). Testing theories of priming. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
35. ZEELENBERG, R., SHIFFRIN, R. M., & RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W. (1999). Priming in a free association task as a function of association directionality. Memory & Cognition, 27, 956-961.