Where is it? How deaf adolescents complete fact-based internet search tasks

American Annals of the Deaf

Volumn 151, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 519-529

  Smith, Chad E ^a  

^a TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249311250     PISSN: 0002726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/aad.2007.0007     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Beggs, W. D. A., & Breslaw, P. I. (1983). Reading retardation or linguistic deficit? III. A further examination of response strategies in a reading test completed by hearing-impaired children. Journal of Research in Reading, 6, 19-28.
2. Bilal, D. (1998). Children's search processes in using World Wide Web search engines: An exploratory study. In Proceedings of the Sixty-First ASIS Annual Meeting, October 24-29, 1998, Pittsburgh, PA (pp. 45-53). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
3. Bilal, D. (1999). Web search engines for children: A comparative study and performance evaluation of Yahooligans!, Ask Jeeves for Kids, and Super Snooper. In Proceedings of the Sixty-Second ASIS Annual Meeting, October 31-November 4, 1999, Washington, DC (pp. 70-83). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
4. Bilal, D. (2000). Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: I. Cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 646-65.
5. Bilal, D. (2001). Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: II. Cognitive and physical behaviors on research tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 118-36.
6. Bilal, D., & Kirby, J. (2002). Differences and similarities in information seeking: Children and adults as Web seekers. Information Processing and Management, 38, 649-70.
7. Bowe, F. (2002). Enhancing reading ability to prevent students from becoming "low-functioning deaf" as adults. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(5), 22-27.
8. Clymer, E. W., & McKee, B. G. (1997). The promise of the World Wide Web and other telecommunication technologies within deaf education. American Annals of the Deaf, 142(2), 104-106.
9. Dew, D. W. (Ed.). (1999). Serving individuals who are low-functioning deaf: Report of the Twenty-Fifth Institute on Rehabilitation Issues. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
10. Dumais, S., Cutrell, E., & Chen, H. (2001). Optimizing search by showing results in context. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 277-283). New York: ACM Press.
11. Eagleton, M., & Guinee, K. (2002). Strategies for supporting student Internet inquiry. The New England Reading Association Journal, 38(2), 39-47.
12. Eagleton, M., Guinee, K., & Langlais, K. (2003). Teaching Internet literacy strategies: The hero inquiry project. Voices From the Middle, 10(3), 28-35.
13. Escoffery, C., Miner, K., Adame, D., Butler, S., McCormick, L., & Mendell, E. (2005). Internet use for health information among college students. Journal of American College Health, 53(4), 183-88.
14. Graham, L., & Metaxes, E (2003). Of course it's true; I saw it on the Internet: Critical thinking in the Internet era. Communications of the ACM, 46(5), 71-75.
15. Jenson, J. (2004). It's the information age, so where's the information? Why our students can't find it, and what we can do to help. College Teaching, 52(3), 107-12.
16. Kelly, R., Albertini, J., & Shannon, N. (2001). Deaf college students' reading comprehension and strategy use. American Annals of the Deaf 146(5), 385-400.
17. Killmer, K., & Koppel, N. (2002). So much information, so little time: Evaluating Web resources with search engines. T.H.E. Journal, 30(1), 21-29.
18. Lawless, K., Mills, R., & Brown, S. (2002). Children's hypertext navigation strategies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 274-84.
19. Leu, D. J. (2000). Our children's future: Changing the focus of literacy and literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 53(4), 424-31. Retrieved March 2005 from http://readingonline.org/electronic/elec_index.asp?HREF- electronic/RT/focus/index.html
20. Lyman-Hagar, M. A., & Davis, J. F. (1996). The case for computer-mediated reading: Une vie de boy. French Review, 69, 775-90.
21. MacGregor, S., & LOU, Y. (2004). Web-based learning: How task scaffolding and Web site design support knowledge acquisition. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 161-75.
22. Nowicki, S. (2000). Google, Inc., Palo Alto, CA. Available from http://www.google.com/ unclesam [accessed July 1999]. Journal of Government Information, 27(1), 71-74
23. Office of Social and Economic Data Analysis. (2003, January). Analysis of 2002 MAP results for eMINTS students. Retrieved March 27, 2005, from http://emints.more.net/evaluation/reports/map2002.pdf.
24. O'Hanlon, N. (2002). Performance of new college students on an Internet skills proficiency test. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(1), 55-66.
25. Ouzts, D., & Palombo, M. (2004). Technology in higher education: A study of perceptions of college professors. TechTrends, 48(5), 17-22, 82.
26. Paul, P., & Quigley, S. (1990). Education and deafness. New York: Longman.
27. Schirmer, B., Bailey, J., & Lockman, A. S. (2004). What verbal protocols reveal about the reading strategies of deaf students: A replication study. American Annals of the Deaf, 149(1), 5-16.
28. Scheffer, B., & Rubenfeld, G. (2000). A consensus statement on critical thinking in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 39, 352-59.
29. Schmar-Dobler, E. (2003). Reading on the Internet: The link between literacy and technology. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 47(1), 80-86.
30. Sengupta, S. (2001). Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain? Language, Learning, and Technology, 5(1), 103-30.
31. Slater, M.D., & Zimmerman, D.E. (2003). Descriptions of Web sites in search listings: A potential obstacle to informed choice in health information. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1281-82.
32. Slone, D. (2003). Internet search approaches: The influence of age, search goals, and experience. Library and Information Science Research, 25(4), 403-418.
33. Soloway, E., Norris, C., Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (2000). K-12 and the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 43(1), 19-23.
34. Toscano, R., McKee, B., & Lepoutre, D. (2002). Success with academic English: Reflections of deaf college students. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(1), 5-23.
35. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). To assure the free appropriate public education of all children with disabilities: Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
36. Walz, J. (2001). Reading hypertext: Higher-level processes. Canadian Modern Language, 57(4), 590-606.
37. Webster, A., Wood, D., & Griffiths, A. J. (1981). Reading retardation or linguistic deficit? I. Interpreting reading test performances of hearing-impaired adolescents. Journal of Research in Reading, 4, 136-47.
38. Wood, D., Wood, H., Griffiths, A. J., & Howarth, I. (1986). Teaching and talking with deaf children. Chichester, England: Wiley.