Image reconstruction of anisotropic conductivity tensor distribution in MREIT: Computer simulation study

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 49, Issue 18, 2004, Pages 4371-4382

  Seo, Jin Keun ^a   Pyo, Hyun Chan ^b   Park, Chunjae ^b   Kwon, Ohin ^c   Woo, Eung Je ^b  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^c Konkuk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ANISOTROPY; DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; LIGHT MODULATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TENSORS;

ANISOTROPIC CONDUCTIVITY; MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY; TENSOR DISTRIBUTION;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

ALGORITHM; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRODE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; ANISOTROPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 4644354703     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/18/012     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Birgul O, Eyuboglu B M and Ider Y Z 2003 Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MR-EIT and its performance with different probing current patterns Phys. Med. Biol. 48 653-71
2. Boone K, Barber D and Brown B 1997 Imaging with electricity: report of the European concerted action on impedance tomography J. Med. Eng. Tech. 21 201-32
3. Eyuboglu M, Birgul O and Ider Y Z 2001 A dual modality system for high resolution-true conductivity imaging Proc. XI Int. Conf. Elec. Bioimpedance (ICEBI) pp 409-13
4. Folland G 1976 Introduction to Partial Differential Equations (Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press)
5. Ider Y Z, Onart S and Lionheart W R B 2003 Uniqueness and reconstruction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) Physiol. Meas. 24 591-604
6. Khang H S, Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 695-702
7. Kwon O, Woo E J, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48 160-7
8. Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K and Baek W S 2003a Static resistivity image of a cubic saline phantom in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) Physiol. Meas. 24 579-89
9. Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J C Lee J Y and Baek W S 2003b Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using recessed electrodes Phys. Med. Biol. 48 1971-86
10. Oh S H, Han J Y, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Lee B I and Woo E J 2003a Electrical conductivity imaging by magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) Mag. Reson. Med. 50 875-8
11. Oh S H, Lee B I, Park T S, Lee S Y, Woo E J and Cho M H 2004 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography at 3 Tesla field strength Mag. Reson. Med. 51 1292-6
12. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3101-16
13. z decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23 388-94
14. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Physiol. Meas. 25 275-69
15. Saulnier G J, Blue R S, Newell J C, Isaacson D and Edic P M 2001 Electrical impedance tomography IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 18 31-43
16. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Henkelman R M 1991 Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 10 362-74
17. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Hankelman R M 1992 Sensitivity of magnetic resonance current density imaging J. Magn. Reson. 97 235-54
18. Seo J K, Yoon J R, Woo E J and Kwon O 2003a Reconstruction of current density distributions in axially symmetric cylindrical sections using one component of magnetic flux density: computer simulation study Physiol. Meas. 24 565-77
19. Seo J K, Yoon J R, Woo E J and Kwon O 2003b Reconstruction of conductivity and current density images using only one component of magnetic field measurements IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 1121-4
20. Tuch D S, Wedeen V J, Dale A M, George J S and Belliveau J W 2001 Conductivity tensor mapping of the human brain using diffusion tensor MRI Pros. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98 11697-701
21. Webster J G (ed) 1990 Electrical Impedance Tomography (Bristol: Adam Hilger)
22. Woo E J, Lee S Y and Mun C W 1994 Impedance tomography using internal current density distribution measured by nuclear magnetic resonance Proc. SPIE 2299 377-85
23. Woo E J, Lee S Y, Seo J K, Kwon O, Oh S H and Lee B 12004 Conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms using a 3.0 Tesla MREIT system 26th Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS at press
24. Zhang N 1992 Electrical impedance tomography based on current density imaging MS Thesis Dept of Elec. Eng., University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada