Measurement of ion diffusion using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 2753-2762

  Hamamura, Mark J ^a   Tugan Muftuler, L ^a   Birgul, Ozlem ^a   Nalcioglu, Orhan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; GELS; IONS; ITERATIVE METHODS; MAGNETIC FLUX; MATRIX ALGEBRA; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

CONDUCTIVITY IMAGES; ION DIFFUSION; MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

AGAROSE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONDUCTANCE; DATA ANALYSIS; DIFFUSION; IMAGING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; ION TRANSPORT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MONITOR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TIME;

ALGORITHMS; DIFFUSION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEPHAROSE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33744824075     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/11/005     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baumann S B, Wozny D R, Kelly S K and Meno F M 1997 The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44 220-3
2. Birgul O, Eyuboglu B M and Ider Y Z 2003a Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MR-EIT and its performance with different probing current patterns Phys. Med. Biol. 48 653-71
3. Birgul O, Eyuboglu B M and Ider Y Z 2003b Experimental results for 2D magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) using magnetic flux density in one direction Phys. Med. Biol. 48 3485-504
4. Crank J 1975 The Mathematics of Diffusion (New York: Oxford University Press)
5. Fuoss R M and Onsanger L 1957 Conductance of unassociated electrolytes J. Phys. Chem. 61 668-82
6. Golub G H, Hanse P C and O'Leary D P 1999 Tikhonov regularization and total least squares SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 21 185-94
7. Ider Y Z and Birgul O 1998 Use of the magnetic field generated by the internal distribution of injected currents for electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) Elektrik 6 215-25
8. Ider Y Z and Muftuler L T 1997 Measurement of AC magnetic field distribution using magnetic resonance imaging IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16 617-22
9. Ider Y Z and Onart S 2004 Algebraic reconstruction for 3D magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using one component of magnetic flux density Physiol. Meas. 25 281-94
10. Jossinet J 1998 The impedivity of freshly excised human breast tissue Physiol. Meas. 19 61-75
11. Khang H S, Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M Y, Kwon O, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 695-702
12. Kwon O, Woo E J, Yoon J R and Seo J K 2002 Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49 160-7
13. Lee B I, Oh S H, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Cho M H, Kwon O, Seo J K and Baek W S 2003 Static resistivity image of a cubic saline phantom in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) Physiol. Meas. 24 579-89
14. Mikac U, Demsar F, Beravs K and Sersa I 2001 Magnetic resonance imaging of alternating electric currents Magn. Reson. Imaging 19 845-56
15. Muftuler L T, Hamamura M, Birgul O and Nalcioglu O 2004 Resolution and contrast in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) and its application to cancer imaging Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 3 599-609
16. Oh S H, Lee B I, Woo E J, Lee S Y, Kim T S, Kwon O and Seo J K 2005 Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MREIT Physiol. Meas. 26 S279-88
17. z decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23 388-94
18. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography Physiol. Meas. 25 257-69
19. Reddy J N 1993 An Introduction to the Finite Element Method (New York: McGraw-Hill)
20. Schantz E J and Lauffer M A 1962 Diffusion measurements in agar gel Biochem. 1 658-63
21. Scott G C, Joy M L G, Armstrong R L and Henkelman R M 1991 Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 10 362-74
22. Seagar A D, Barber D C and Brown B H 1987 Theoretical limits to sensitivity and resolution in impedance imaging Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 8 (suppl A) 13-31
23. Seo J K, Yoon J R, Woo E J and Kwon O 2003 Reconstruction of conductivity and current density images using only one component of magnetic field measurements IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 1121-4
24. Surowiec A J, Stuchly S S, Barr J R and Swarup A 1988 Dielectric properties of breast carcinoma and the surrounding tissues IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng. 35 257-63