Prospects for association mapping in classical inbred mouse strains

Genetics

Volumn 175, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1999-2008

  Payseur, Bret A ^a   Place, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HAPLOTYPE; INBREEDING; MOUSE STRAIN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC MARKERS; HAPLOTYPES; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MICE; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 34249037798     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.067868     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. ABECASIS, G. R., L. R. CARDON and W. O. COOKSON, 2000 A general test of association for quantitative traits in nuclear families. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66: 279-292.
2. ANDERSON, E. C., and J. NOVEMBRE, 2003 Finding haplotype block boundaries by using the minimum-description-length principle. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73: 336-354.
3. BALDING, D. J., 2006 A tutorial on statistical methods for population association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7: 781-791.
4. BEAVIS, W. D., 1994 The power and deceit of QTL experiments: lessons from comparative QTL studies. Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conference, American Seed Trade Association, Washington, DC, pp. 250-266.
5. BECK, J. A., S. LLOYD, M. HAFEZPARAST, M. LENNON-PIERCE, J. T. EPPIG et al., 2000 Genealogies of mouse inbred strains. Nat. Genet. 24: 23-25.
6. BOGUE, M. A., and S. C. GRUBB, 2004 The Mouse Phenome Project. Genetica 122: 71-74.
7. CERVINO, A. C., G. LI, S. EDWARDS, J. ZHU, C. LAURIE et al., 2005 Integrating QTL and high-density SNP analyses in mice to identify Insig2 as a susceptibility gene for plasma cholesterol levels. Genomics 86: 505-517.
8. CERVINO, A. C., A. DARVASI, M. FALLAHI, C. C. MADER and N. F. TSINOREMAS, 2007 An integrated in silico gene mapping strategy in inbred mice. Genetics 175: 321-333.
9. CHESLER, E. J., S. L. RODRIGUEZ-ZAS and J. S. MOGIL, 2001 In silico mapping of mouse quantitative trait loci. Science 294: 2423.
10. CHURCHILL, G. A., D. C. AIREY, H. ALLAYEE, J. M. ANGEL, A. D. ATTIE et al., 2004 The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nat. Genet. 36: 1133-1137.
11. CUPPEN, E., 2005 Haplotype-based genetics in mice and rats. Trends Genet. 21: 318-322.
12. DARVASI, A., 2001 In silico mapping of mouse quantitative trait loci. Science 294: 2423.
13. DEVLIN, B., and N. RISCH, 1995 A comparison of linkage disequilibrium measures for fine-scale mapping. Genomics 29: 311-322.
14. DEVLIN, B., and K. ROEDER, 1999 Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 55: 997-1004.
15. DIPETRILLO, K., S. W. TSAIH, S. SHEEHAN, C. JOHNS, P. KELMENSON et al., 2004 Genetic analysis of blood pressure in C3H/HeJ and SWR/J mice. Physiol. Genomics 17: 215-220.
16. DIPETRILLO, K., X. WANG, I. M. STYLIANOU and B. PAIGEN, 2005 Bioinformatics toolbox for narrowing rodent quantitative trait loci. Trends Genet. 21: 683-692.
17. EWENS, W. J., and R. S. SPIELMAN, 1995 The transmission/disequilibrium test: history, subdivision, and admixture. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57: 455-464.
18. FLINT, J., W. VALDAR, S. SHIFMAN and R. MOTT, 2005 Strategies for mapping and cloning quantitative trait genes in rodents. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6: 271-286.
19. FRAZER, K. A., C. M. WADE, D. A. HINDS, N. PATIL, D. R. COX et al., 2004 Segmental phylogenetic relationships of inbred mouse strains revealed by fine-scale analysis of sequence variation across 4.6 mb of mouse genome. Genome Res. 14: 1493-1500.
20. GABRIEL, S. B., S. F. SCHAFFNER, H. NGUYEN, J. M. MOORE, J. ROY et al., 2002 The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 296: 2225-2229.
21. GRUBB, S. C., G. A. CHURCHILL and M. A. BOGUE, 2004 A collaborative database of inbred mouse strain characteristics. Bioinformatics 20: 2857-2859.
22. GRUPE, A., S. GERMER, J. USUKA, D. AUD, J. K. BELKNAP et al., 2001 In silico mapping of complex disease-related traits in mice. Science 292: 1915-1918.
23. HILL, W. G., and A. ROBERTSON, 1968 Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 38: 226-231.
24. HIRSCHHORN, J. N., and M. J. DALY, 2005 Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6: 95-108.
25. IDERAABDULLAH, F. Y., E. DE LA CASA- ESPERON, T. A. BELL, D. A. DETWILER, T. MAGNUSON et al., 2004 Genetic and haplotype diversity among wild-derived mouse inbred strains. Genome Res. 14: 1880-1887.
26. IHAKA, R., and R. GENTLEMAN, 1996 R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comp. Graph. Stat. 5: 299-314.
27. JUNG, J., R. FAN and L. JIN, 2005 Combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait loci by multiple markers. Genetics 170: 881-898.
28. LANDER, E. S., and N. J. SCHORK, 1994 Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 265: 2037-2048.
29. LEWONTIN, R. C., 1964 The interaction of selection and linkage. I. General considerations; heterotic models. Genetics 49: 49-67.
30. LIAO, G., J. WANG, J. GUO, J. ALLARD, J. CHENG et al., 2004 In silico genetics: identification of a functional element regulating H2-Ealpha gene expression. Science 306: 690-695.
31. LIU, P., Y. WANG, H. VIKIS, A. MACIAG, D. WANG et al., 2006 Candidate lung tumor susceptibility genes identified through whole-genome association analyses in inbred mice. Nat. Genet. 38: 888-895.
32. LYNCH, M., and B. WALSH, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
33. MCCLURG, P., M. T. PLETCHER, T. WILTSHIRE and A. I. SU, 2006 Comparative analysis of haplotype association algorithms. BMC Bioinform. 7: 61.
34. MCCULLAGH, P., and J. A. NELDER, 1989 Generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall, New York.
35. MHYRE, T. R., E. J. CHESLER, M. THIRUCHELVAM, C. LUNGU, D. A. CORY-SLECHTA et al., 2005 Heritability, correlations and in silico mapping of locomotor behavior and neurochemistry in inbred strains of mice. Genes Brain Behav. 4: 209-228.
36. MOTT, R., C. J. TALBOT, M. G. TURRI, A. C. COLLINS and J. FLINT, 2000 A method for fine mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred animal stocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 12649-12654.
37. NEI, M., 1987 Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
38. PARK, Y. G., R. CLIFFORD, K. H. BUETOW and K. W. HUNTER, 2003 Multiple cross and inbred strain haplotype mapping of complex-trait candidate genes. Genome Res. 13: 118-121.
39. PATIL, N., A. J. BERNO, D. A. HINDS, W. A. BARRETT, J. M. DOSHI et al., 2001 Blocks of limited haplotype diversity revealed by highresolution scanning of human chromosome 21. Science 294: 1719-1723.
40. PLETCHER, M. T., P. MCCLURG, S. BATALOV, A. I. SU, S. W. BARNES et al., 2004 Use of a dense single nucleotide polymorphism map for in silico mapping in the mouse. PLoS Biol. 2: e393.
41. PRITCHARD, J. K., and M. PRZEWORSKI, 2001 Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69: 1-14.
42. PRITCHARD, J. K., and N. A. ROSENBERG, 1999 Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65: 220-228.
43. PRITCHARD, J. K., M. STEPHENS and P. DONNELLY, 2000 Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
44. REICH, D. E., and D. B. GOLDSTEIN, 2001 Detecting association in a case-control study while correcting for population stratification. Genet. Epidemiol. 20: 4-16.
45. RISCH, N. J., 2000 Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature 405: 847-856.
46. SILVER, L. M., 1995 Mouse Genetics. Oxford University Press, New York.
47. VALDAR, W., L. C. SOLBERG, D. GAUGUIER, S. BURNETT, P. KLENERMAN et al., 2006 Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice. Nat. Genet. 38: 879-887.
48. WADE, C. M., and M. J. DALY, 2005 Genetic variation in laboratory mice. Nat. Genet. 37: 1175-1180.
49. WADE, C. M., E. J. KULBOKAS 3rd, A. W. KIRBY, M. C. ZODY, J. C. MULLIKIN et al., 2002 The mosaic structure of variation in the laboratory mouse genome. Nature 420: 574-578.
50. WANG, J., G. LIAO, J. USUKA and G. PELTZ, 2005 Computational genetics: From mouse to human? Trends Genet. 21: 526-532.
51. WANG, T., and R. C. ELSTON, 2006 A quantitative linkage score for an association study following a linkage analysis. BMC Genet. 7: 5.
52. WANG, X., R. KORSTANJE, D. HIGGINS and B. PAIGEN, 2004 Haplotype analysis in multiple crosses to identify a QTL gene. Genome Res. 14: 1767-1772.
53. WILLIAMS, R. W., J. GU, S. QI and L. LU, 2001 The genetic structure of recombinant inbred mice: high-resolution consensus maps for complex trait analysis. Genome Biol. 2: RESEARCH0046.
54. WILTSHIRE, T., M. T. PLETCHER, S. BATALOV, S. W. BARNES, L. M. TARANTINO et al., 2003 Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis defines haplotype patterns in mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 3380-3385.
55. YALCIN, B., J. FLINT and R. MOTT, 2005 Using progenitor strain information to identify quantitative trait nucleotides in outbred mice. Genetics 171: 673-681.
56. YALCIN, B., J. FULLERTON, S. MILLER, D. A. KEAYS, S. BRADY et al., 2004 Unexpected complexity in the haplotypes of commonly used inbred strains of laboratory mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 9734-9739.
57. YU, J., G. PRESSOIR, W. H. BRIGGS, I. VROH BI, M. YAMASAKI et al., 2006 A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38: 203-208.
58. ZHANG, J., K. W. HUNTER, M. GANDOLPH, W. L. ROWE, R. P. FINNEY et al., 2005 A high-resolution multistrain haplotype analysis of laboratory mouse genome reveals three distinctive genetic variation patterns. Genome Res. 15: 241-249.
59. ZHANG, K., M. DENG, T. CHEN, M. S. WATERMAN and F. SUN, 2002 A dynamic programming algorithm for haplotype block partitioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 7335-7339.
60. ZONDERVAN, K. T., and L. R. CARDON, 2004 The complex interplay among factors that influence allelic association. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5: 89-100.