Genetic and haplotype diversity among wild-derived mouse inbred strains

Genome Research

Volumn 14, Issue 10 A, 2004, Pages 1880-1887

  Ideraabdullah, Folami Y ^a,b   de la Casa Esperón, Elena ^c   Bell, Timothy A ^a   Detwiler, David A ^a   Magnuson, Terry ^a,b   Sapienza, Carmen ^c   de Villena, Fernando Pardo Manuel ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c TEMPLE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; GENE DELETION; GENE INSERTION; GENE LOCUS; GENE SEGREGATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; HAPLOTYPE; HYBRID; INBRED STRAIN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOSAICISM; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SUBSPECIES; WILD SPECIES;

MUS; MUS MUSCULUS; MUSCULUS;

EID: 6344222247     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.2519704     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Auffray, J.-C., Vanlerberghe, F., and Britton-Davidian, J. 1990. The house mouse progression in Eurasia: A palaeontological and archaeozoological approach. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41: 13-25.
2. Beck, J.A., Lloyd, S., Hafezparast, M., Lennon-Pierce, M., Eppig, J.T., Festing, M.F., and Fisher, E.M. 2000. Genealogies of mouse inbred strains. Nat. Genet. 24: 23-25.
3. Bonhomme, F. and Guenet, J.L. 1996. The laboratory mouse and its wild relatives. In Genetic variants and strains of the laboratory mouse, 3rd ed. (ed. M.F. Lyon et al.), pp. 1577-1596. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
4. Bonhomme, F., Guenet, J.L., Dod, B., Moriwaki, K., and Bulfield, G. 1987. The polyphyletic origin of laboratory inbred mice and their rate of evolution. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 30: 51-58.
5. Chen, F.C. and Li, W.H. 2001. Genomic divergences between humans and other hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68: 444-456.
6. Chevret, P., Jenkins, P., and Catzeflis, F. 2002. Evolutionary systematics of the Indian mouse Mus famulus Bonhote, 198: Molecular (DNA/DNA hybridization and 12S rRNA sequences) and morphological evidences. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 137: 385.
7. Din, W., Anad, R., Boursot, P., Darviche, D., Dod, B., Jouvin-Marche, E., Orth, A., Talwar, G.P., Cazenave, P.A., and Bonhomme, F. 1996. Origin and radiation of the house mouse: Clues from nuclear genes. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 519-539.
8. Ebersberger, I., Metzler, D., Schwarz, C., and Paabo, S. 2002. Genomewide comparison of DNA sequences between humans and chimpanzees. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70: 1490-1497.
9. Ferris, S.D., Sage, R.D., and Wilson, A.C. 1982. Evidence from mtDNA sequences that common laboratory strains of inbred mice are descended from a single female. Nature 295: 163-165.
10. Foreit, J. 1996. Hybrid sterility in the mouse. Trends Genet. 12: 412-417.
11. Greene-Till, R., Zhao, Y., and Hardies, S.C. 2000. Gene flow of unique sequences between Mus musculus domesticus and Mus spretus. Mamm. Genome. 11: 225-230.
12. Grupe, A., Germer S., Usuka, J., Aud, D., Belknap, J.K., Klein, R.F., Ahluwalia, M.K., Higuchi, R., and Peltz, G. 2001. In silico mapping of complex disease related traits in mice. Science i ] 292: 1915-1918.
13. Guenet, J.L. and Bonhomme, F. 2003. Wild mice: An ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model. Trends Genet. 19: 24-31.
14. Kaessmann, H., Wiebe, V., and Paabo, S. 1999. Extensive nuclear DNA sequence diversity among chimpanzees. Science 286: 1159-1162.
15. Kaessmann, H., Wiebe, V., Weiss, G., and Paabo, S. 2001. Great ape DNA sequences reveal a reduced diversity and an expansion in humans. Nat. Genet. 27: 155-156.
16. Lindblad-Toh, K., Winchester, E., Daly, M.J., Wang, D.G., Hirschhorn, J.N., Laviolette, J.P., Ardlie, K., Reich, D.E., Robinson, E., Sklar, P., et al. 2000. Large-scale discovery and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 24: 381-386.
17. Lundrigan, B.L., Jansa, S.A., and Tucker, P.K. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Mus, based on paternally, maternally, and biparentally inherited characters. Syst. Biol. 51: 410-431.
18. Orth, A., Belkhir, K., Britton-Davidian, J., Boursot, P., Benazzou, T., and Bonhomme, F. 2002. Hybridation naturelle entre deuz expeces sympatriques de souris: M. musculus domesticus et M. spretus Lataste. C.R. Biol. 325: 89-97.
19. Prager, E.M., Orrego, C., and Sage, R.D. 1998. Genetic variation and phylogeography of central Asian and other house mice, including a major new mitochondrial lineage in Yemen. Genetics 150: 835-861.
20. Reich, D.E., Gabriel, S.B., and Altshuler, D. 2003. Quality and completeness of SNP databases Nat. Genet. 33: 457-458.
21. Sachidanandam, R., Weissman, D., Schmidt, S.C., Kakol, J.M., Stein, L.D., Marth, G., Sherry, S., Mullikin, J.C., Mortimore, B.J., Willey, D.L., et al. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 409: 928-933.
22. Sakate, R., Osada, N., Hida, M., Sugano, S., Hayasaka, I., Shimohira, N., Yanagi, S., Suto, Y., Hashimoto, K., and Hirai, M. 2003. Analysis of 5′-end sequences of chimpanzee cDNAs. Genome Res. 13: 1022-1026.
23. Salisbury, B.A., Pungliya, M., Choi, J.Y., Jiang, R., Sun, X.J., and Stephens, J.C. 2003. SNP and haplotype variation in the human genome. Mutat. Res. 526: 53-61.
24. Schalkwyk, L.C., Jung, M., Daser, A., Weiher, M., Walter, J., Himmelbauer, N., and Lehrach, H. 1999. Panel of microsatellite markers for whole-genome scans and radiation hybrid mapping and a mouse family tree. Genome Res. 9: 878-887.
25. She, J.X., Bonhomme, F., Boursot, P., Thaler, L., and Catzeflis, F. 1990. Molecular phylogenies in the genus Mus: Comparative analysis of electrophoretic, scnDNA hybridization, and mtDNA RFLP data. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41: 83-103.
26. Tucker, P.K., Lee, B.K., Lundrigan, B.L., and Eicher, E.M. 1992. Geographical origin of the Y chromosomes in "old" inbred strains of mice. Mamm. Genome 3: 254-261.
27. Venter, J.C., Adams, M.D., Myers, E.W., Li, P.W., Mural, R.J., Sutton, G.G., Smith, H.O., Yandell, M., Evans, C.A., Holt, R.A., et al. 2001. The sequence of the human genome. Science i ] 291: 1304-1351.
28. Vogel, G. 2003. Scientists dream of 1001 complex mice. Science i ] 301: 456-457.
29. Wade, C.M., Kulbokas III, E.J., Kirby, A.W., Zody, M.C., Mullikin, J.C., Lander, E.S., Lindblad-Toh, K., and Daly, M.J. 2002. The mosaic structure of variation in the laboratory mouse genome. Nature 420: 574-578.
30. Waterston, R.H., Lindblad-Toh, K., Birney, E., Rogers, J., Abril, J.F., Agarwal, P., Agarwala, R., Ainscough, R., Alexandersson, M., An, P., et al. 2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420: 520-562.
31. Wiltshire, T., Pletcher, M.T., Batalov, S., Barnes, S.W., Tarantino, L.M., Cooke, M.P., Wu, H., Smylie, K., Santrosyan, A., Copeland, N.G., et al. 2003. Genome-wide single-nucleotidepolymorphism analysis defines haplotype patterns in mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 3380-3385.
32. Yalcin, B., Fullerton, J., Miller, S., Keays, D.A., Brady, S., Bhomra A., Jefferson, A., Volpi, E., Copley, R.R., Flint, J., et al. 2004. Unexpected complexity in the haplotypes of the commonly used inbred strains of laboratory mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 26: 9734-9739.
33. Zietkiewicz, E., Yotova, V., Gehl, D., Wambach, T., Arrieta, I., Batzer, M., Cole, D.F., Hechtman, P., Kaplan, F., Modiano, D., et al. 2003. Haplotypes in the dystrophin DNA segmen point to a mosaic origin of modern human diversity. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73: 994-1015.