How to improve decision making in small groups: Effects of dissent and training interventions

Small Group Research

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 437-468

  Klocke, Ulrich ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biased information sampling; Dissent; Group decision making; Hidden profile; Preference consistency

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249001666     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: 15528278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496407301974     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (57)

1. Brodbeck, F.C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Schulz-Hardt, S. (in press). Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Academy of Management Review.
2. Brodbeck, F.C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002). The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The effects of pre-discussion dissent. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 35-56.
3. Brownstein, A.L. (2003). Biased predecision processing. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 545-568.
4. Dahlin, K.B., Weingart, L.R., Hinds, P.J. (2005). Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1107-1123.
5. David, B., Turner, J.C. (2001). Majority and minority influence: A single process self-categorization analysis. In C. K. W. De Dreu N. K. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 91-121). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
6. Dennis, A.R. (1996). Information exchange and use in small group decision making. Small Group Research, 27, 532-550.
7. Devine, D.J. (1999). Effects of cognitive ability, task knowledge, information sharing, and conflict on group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 608-634.
8. Dooley, R.S., Fryxell, G.E. (1999). Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 389-402.
9. Edwards, K., Smith, E.E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 71, 5-24.
10. Fiske, S.T. (1995). Social cognition. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 149-193). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Galinsky, A.D., Kray, L.J. (2004). From thinking about what might have been to sharing what we know: The effects of counterfactual mind-sets on information sharing in groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 606-618.
12. Gigone, D., Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959-974.
13. Gigone, D., Hastie, R. (1997). The impact of information on small group choice. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 72, 132-140.
14. Greitemeyer, T., Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 84, 322-339.
15. Greitemeyer, T., Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F.C., Frey, D. (2006). Information sampling and group decision making: The effects of an advocacy decision procedure and task experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 31-42.
16. Greitemeyer, T., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D. (2003). Prferenzkonsistenz und Geteiltheit von Information als Einflussfaktoren auf Informationsbewertung und intendiertes Diskussionsverhalten bei Gruppenentscheidungen [Preference-consistency and sharedness of information as determinants of information evaluation and intended discussion behavior in group decision making]. Zeitschrift fr Sozialpsychologie, 34, 9-23.
17. Hollingshead, A.B. (1996). The rank-order effect in group decision making. Organizational Behavior Human Decision Processes, 68, 181-193.
18. Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink (2 nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
19. Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B., Neale, M.A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
20. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.
21. Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4 th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
22. Kenny, D.A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., Kashy, D.A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 83, 126-137.
23. Kerschreiter, R., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D. (2005, September). Entscheidungsprferenzen als Einflussfaktoren auf den Informationsaustausch in Gruppen [Decision preferences as determinants of information exchange in groups]. Paper presented at the 10th Tagung of the Fachgruppe Sozialpsychologie, Jena.
24. Larson, J.R., Jr., Christensen, C., Franz, T.M., Abbott, A.S. (1998). Diagnosing groups: The pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 93-108.
25. Larson, J.R., Jr., Foster-Fishman, P.G., Franz, T.M. (1998). Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 482-495.
26. Larson, J.R., Jr., Foster-Fishman, P.G., Keys, C.B. (1994). Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 67, 446-461.
27. Lavery, T.A., Franz, T.M., Winquist, J.R., Larson, J.R., Jr. (1999). The role of information exchange in predicting group accuracy on a multiple judgment task. Basic Applied Social Psychology, 21, 281-289.
28. Lord, C.G., Ross, L., Lepper, M.R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
29. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D.L., Weingart, L.R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779-793.
30. Mennecke, B.E. (1997). Using group support systems to discover hidden profiles: An examination of the influence of group size and meeting structures on information sharing and decision quality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 387-405.
31. Mojzisch, A., Schulz-Hardt, S. (2005, September 26-28). Der Einfluss von Prferenzrckmeldungen auf die Entscheidungsqualitt im Hidden Profile Paradigma [The influence of preference feedback on decision quality in the hidden profile paradigm]. Paper presented at the 10th Conference of the Fachgruppe Sozialpsychologie of the DGPs, Jena.
32. Mojzisch, A., Schulz-Hardt, S. (2006). Information sampling in group decision making: Sampling biases and their consequences. In K. Fiedler P. Juslin (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 299-325). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Nemeth, C.J., Nemeth-Brown, B. (2003). Better than individuals? The potential benefits of dissent and diversity for group creativity. In P. B. Paulus B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34. Parks, C.D., Nelson, N.L. (1999). Discussion and decision: The interrelationship between initial preference distribution and group discussion content. Organizational Behavior Human Decision Processes, 80, 87-101.
35. Peterson, R.S., Owens, P.D., Tetlock, P.E., Fan, E.T., Martorana, P. (1998). Group dynamics in top management teams: Groupthink, vigilance, and alternative models of organizational failure and success. Organizational Behavior Human Decision Processes, 73, 272-305.
36. Petty, R.E., Fleming, M.A., Priester, J.R., Feinstein, A.H. (2001). Individual versus group interest violation: Surprise as a determinant of argument scrutiny and persuasion. Social Cognition, 19, 418-442.
37. Petty, R.E., Wegener, D.T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 37-72). New York: Guilford.
38. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 80, 918-930.
39. Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F.C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1080-1093.
40. Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Lthgens, C., Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 655-669.
41. Smith, P.L., Ragan, T.J. (1999). Instructional design (2 nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
42. Stasser, G., Stewart, D.D., Wittenbaum, G.M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265.
43. Stasser, G., Taylor, L.A., Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.
44. Stasser, G., Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
45. Stasser, G., Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of common information on the dissemination of unique information during group discussion. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 53, 81-93.
46. Stewart, D.D., Billings, R.S., Stasser, G. (1998). Accountability and the discussion of unshared, critical information in decision-making groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 18-23.
47. Tabachnik, B.G., Fidell, L.S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper.
48. Tasa, K., Whyte, G. (2005). Collective efficacy and vigilant problem solving in group decision making: A non-linear model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 119-129.
49. Tetlock, P.E., Peterson, R.S., McGuire, C., Chang, S.-J. (1992). Assessing political group dynamics: A test of the groupthink model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 403-425.
50. Van Swol, L.M., Savadori, L., Sniezek, J.A. (2003). Factors that may affect the difficulty of uncovering hidden profiles. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 6, 285-304.
51. Winquist, J.R., Larson, J.R., Jr. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 74, 371-377.
52. Wittenbaum, G.M. (1998). Information sampling in decision-making groups: The impact of members' task-relevant status. Small Group Research, 29, 57-84.
53. Wittenbaum, G.M., Bowman, J.M. (2004). A social validation explanation for mutual enhancement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 169-184.
54. Wittenbaum, G.M., Bowman, J.M., Hollingshead, A.B. (2003, November). Strategic information sharing in mixed-motive decision-making groups. Paper presented at the Small Group Division of the National Communication Association, Miami, FL.
55. Wittenbaum, G.M., Hollingshead, A.B., Botero, I.C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286-310.
56. Wittenbaum, G.M., Hubbell, A.P., Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 77, 967-978.
57. Wittenbaum, G.M., Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 3-28). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.