Using a voting system in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology to enhance learning in the English language classroom

Computers and Education

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 338-356

  Cutrim, Euline Schmid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evaluation of CAL systems; Improving classroom teaching; Interactive learning environments; Pedagogical issues

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; DATA ACQUISITION; FEEDBACK; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

IMPROVING CLASSROOM TEACHING; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; INTERACTIVE VOTING SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARDS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 35148875277     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aldrich F., Rogers Y., and Scaife M. Getting to grips with "interactivity": helping teachers assess the educational value of CD-ROMs. British Journal of Educational Technology 29 4 (1998) 321-332
2. Bell, M. A. (2000). Impact of the electronic interactive whiteboard on students attitudes and achievement in eighth-grade writing instruction. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Baylor University.
3. Burns C., and Myhill D. Interactive or inactive? A consideration of the nature of interaction in whole class teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education 34 (2004) 35-49
4. Bruner J. Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In: Wertsch J. (Ed). Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (1985), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Clarke D. Materials adaptation: why leave it all to the teacher?. ELT Journal 43 2 (1989) 133-141
6. Cutts Q., and Kennedy G. Connecting learning environments using electronic voting systems. Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Conference on Computing Education Vol. 42 (2005), Newcastle, Australia 181-186
7. Cutts, Q., Kennedy, G., Mitchell, C., & Draper, S. (2004). Maximising dialogue in lectures using group response systems. In Proceedings of the 7th IASTED international conference on computers and advanced technology in education, Hawaii, USA.
8. DfES (2004). Information and communications technology in schools in England 2004 - First Release. Accessed 23rd August 2005 from: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/.
9. Draper S.W., and Brown M.I. Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 (2004) 81-94
10. Edwards D., and Mercer N. Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom (1987), Methuen, London
11. English E., Hargreaves L., and Hislam J. Pedagogical dilemmas in the National Literacy Strategy: primary teachers' perceptions, reflections and classroom behaviour. Cambridge Journal of Education 32 1 (2002) 9-26
12. Glover D., and Miller D. Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Journal of Information Technologies for Teacher Education 10 3 (2001) 257-278
13. Glover D., and Miller D. The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change: the experience of five elementary schools in an English Education Authority. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual 1 (2002) 5-19
14. Goodison T. Integrating ICT in the classroom: a case study of two contrasting lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology 34 5 (2003) 549-566
15. Greiffenhagen, C. (2000). From traditional blackboards to interactive whiteboards: a pilot study to inform technology design. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 24 (2), pp. 305-312).
16. Hall I., and Higgins S. Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboard. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2 (2005) 102-117
17. Hargreaves L. How do primary school teachers define and implement 'interactive teaching' in the National Literacy Strategy in England?. Research Pages in Education 18 3 (2003) 217-236
18. Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study. Department of Information Studies (DIS), University of Sheffield. Accessed 5th December 2002 from: http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm.
19. Mroz M.A., Smith F., and Hardman F. The discourse of the literacy hour. Cambridge Journal of Education 30 (2000) 379-390
20. Sinclair J.M., and Coulthard R.M. Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils (1975), Oxford University Press, London
21. Smith F., Hardman F., and Higgins S. The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. British Educational Research Journal 32 3 (2006) 443-457
22. Smith F., Hardman F., Wall K., and Mroz M. Interactive whole class teaching in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal 30 (2004) 395-411
23. Smith H.J., Higgins S., Wall K., and Miller J. Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21 2 (2005) 91-101
24. Stuart S., Brown M., and Draper S.W. Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: one practitioner's application. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 (2004) 95-102
25. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society: Development of the higher psychological processes (1978), Harvard University Press, Harvard
26. Wit E. Who wants to be ... the use of a personal response system in statistics teaching. MSOR Connection 3 2 (2003) 14-20