Metapopulation structure and habitat quality in modelling dispersal in the butterfly Iolana iolas

Oikos

Volumn 116, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 793-806

  G Rabasa, Sonia ^a   Gutiérrez, David ^a   Escudero, Adrián ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT QUALITY; METAPOPULATION; MIGRATION; MORTALITY; MOVEMENT; POPULATION STRUCTURE;

IOLANA IOLAS;

EID: 34247332352     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15788.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anonymous. 1992. Decreto 18/1992, de 26 de marzo, por el que se aprueba el Catálogo Regional de Especies Amenazadas de Fauna y Flora Silvestres de la Comunidad de Madrid y creación de la categoría de árboles singulares. - Boletín Oficial de la Comunidad de Madrid 85.
2. Armstrong, D. P. 2005. Integrating the metapopulation and habitat paradigms for understanding broad-scale declines of species Conserv. Biol. 19:1402 1410.
3. Arnason, A. N. Schwarz, C. J. 1999. Using POPAN-5 to analyse banding data Bird Study 46 (suppl):127 168.
4. Baguette, M. Mennenchez, G. 2004. Resource and habitat patches, landscape ecology and metapopulation biology: a consensual viewpoint Oikos 106:399 403.
5. Baguette, M. et al. 1998. Sex-biased density-dependent migration in a metapopulation of the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia Acta Oecol. 19:17 24.
6. Baguette, M. et al. 2000. Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation J. Appl. Ecol. 37:100 108.
7. Bergman, K. 2001. Population dynamics and importance of habitat management for conservation of the butterfly Lopinga achine J. Appl. Ecol. 38:1303 1313.
8. Blower, J. G. et al. 1981. Estimating the size of animal populations. Alden, Oxford, UK.
9. Brown, J. H. Kodric-Brown, A. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction Ecology 58:445 449.
10. Cizek, O. Konvicka, M. 2005. What is a patch in a dynamic metapopulation? Mobility of an endangered woodland butterfly Euphydryas maturna Ecography 28:791 800.
11. Dennis, R. L. H. Eales, H. T. 1999. Probability of site occupancy in the large heath butterfly Coenonympha tullia determined from geographical an ecological data Biol. Conserv. 87:295 301.
12. Dennis, R. L. H. et al. 2003. Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint Oikos 102:417 426.
13. Dennis, R. H. L. et al. 2006. Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies Biodiv. Conserv. 15:1943 1966.
14. Enfjäll, K. Leimar, O. 2005. Density-dependent dispersal in the Glanville fritillary, Melitaea cinxia Oikos 108:465 472.
15. Englund, G. Hambäck, P. 2004. Scale-dependence of emigration rate Ecology 85:320 327.
16. Fleishman, E. et al. 2002. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics Conserv. Biol. 16:706 716.
17. Gall, L. F. 1984. The effects of capturing and marking on subsequent activity in Boloria acrocnema (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), with a comparison of different numerical models that estimate population size Biol. Conserv. 28:139 154.
18. Gil-T, F. 2001. Estudio sobre la influencia de parasitoides (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) en poblaciones del raro lepidóptero Iolana iolas Oschsenheimer, 1816 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) Bol. SEA 29:85 88.
19. Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol 63:151 162.
20. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford Univ. Press.
21. Hanski, I. Gilpin, M. E. 1997. Metapopulation biology. Academic Press.
22. Hanski, I. et al. 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations Ecology 81:239 251.
23. Heikkinen, R. K. et al. 2005. New insights into butterfly-environment relationships using partitioning methods Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272:2203 2210.
24. Hill, J. K. et al. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure J. Anim. Ecol. 65:725 735.
25. Hoyle, M. James, M. 2005. Global warming, human population pressure, and viability of the World′s smallest butterfly Conserv. Biol. 19:1113 1124.
26. Kuussaari, M. et al. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia J. Anim. Ecol. 65:791 801.
27. Kuussaari, M. et al. 1998. Allee effect and population dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Oikos 82:384 392.
28. Matter, S. F. Roland, J. 2002. An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus Ecol. Entomol. 27:308 316.
29. Matter, S. F. et al. 2004. Migration and survival of Parnassius smintheus: detecting effects of habitat for individuals butterflies Ecol. Appl. 14:1526 1534.
30. Menéndez, R et al. 2002. Migration and Allee effects in the six-spot burnet moth Zygaena filipendulae Ecol. Entomol. 27:317 325.
31. Mennechez, G. et al. 2004. Modelling mortality and dispersal: consequences of parameter generalisation on metapopulation dynamics Oikos 106:243 291.
32. Moilanen, A. 2004. SPOMSIM: software for stochastic patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics Ecol. Modell. 179:533 550.
33. Moilanen, A. Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure Ecology 79:2503 2515.
34. Munguira, M. L. 1989. Biología y biogeografía de los licénidos Ibéricos en peligro de extinción (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). - PhD thesis, Serv. Publ. Univ. Autónoma de Madrid.
35. Munguira, M. L. Martín, J. 1993. The conservation of endangered lycaenid butterflies in Spain Biol. Conserv. 66:17 22.
36. Odendaal, F.J. et al. 1989. Influence of host-plant density and male harassment on the distribution of female Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae) Oecologia 78:283 288.
37. Petit, S. et al. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics of the fritillary butterfly: movements between patches Oikos 92:491 500.
38. Pollard, E. Yates, T. J. 1993. Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman and Hall.
39. Rabasa, S. G. et al. 2005. Egg laying by a butterfly on a fragmented host plant: a multi-level approach Ecography 28:629 639.
40. Roland, J. et al. 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size Ecology 81:1642 1653.
41. Schneider, C. et al. 2003. Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study area Ecol. Entomol. 28:219 227.
42. Schtickzelle, N. Baguette, M. 2003. Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in a fragmented landscape J. Anim. Ecol. 72:533 545.
43. Schtickzelle, N. et al. 2006. Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly Ecology 87:1057 1065.
44. Schwartz, M. W. 1992. Modelling effects of habitat fragmentation on the ability of trees to respond to climate warming Biodiv. Conserv. 2:51 61.
45. Shreeve, T. G. Dennis, R. L. H. 2004. Resources, habitats and metapopulations - whither reality? Oikos 106:404 408.
46. Stacey, P. B. et al. 1997. Migration within metapopulations: the impact upon local population dynamics Hanski, I. Gilpin, M. E. Metapopulation biology. Ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press 359 386.
47. Southwood, T. R. E. 1978. Ecological methods. Halsted.
48. Sutcliffe, O. L. Thomas, C. D. 1997. Area-dependent migration by ringlet butterflies generates a mixture of patchy population and metapopulation attributes Oecologia 109:229 234.
49. Talavera, S. Arista, M. 1998. Notas sobre el género Colutea (Leguminosae) en España Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 56:410 416.
50. Thomas, J. A. 1983. A quick method for estimating butterfly numbers during surveys Biol. Conserv. 27:195 211.
51. Thomas, J. A. et al. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:1791 1796.
52. Tolman, T. Lewington, R. 1997. Butterflies of Britain & Europe.Collins Field Guide. Harper Collins Publishers.
53. Välimaki, P. Itämies, J. 2003. Migration of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne in a network of suitable habitats - effects of patch characteristics Ecography 25:679 691.
54. Van Dyck, H. Baguette, M. 2005. Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: routine or special movements? Basic Appl. Ecol. 6:535 545.
55. Viedma, M. Gómez-Bustillo, M. R. 1985. Revisión del Libro Rojo de los Lepidópteros Ibéricos. I.C.O.N.A.
56. Wahlberg, N. et al. 2002. Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies Oecologia 130:33 43.
57. Wang, R. et al. 2004. Contrasting movement patterns in two species of chequerspot butterflies, Euphydryas aurinia and Melitaea phoebe, in the same patch network Ecol. Entomol. 29:367 374.
58. Wilson, R. J. et al. 2002. Large-scale patterns of distribution and persistence at the range margins of a butterfly Ecology 83:3357 3368.