What is a patch in a dynamic metapopulation? Mobility of an endangered woodland butterfly, Euphydryas maturna

Ecography

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 791-800

  Cizek, Oldrich ^a   Konvicka, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF ENTOMOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; DISPERSAL; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; METAPOPULATION; PATCH DYNAMICS; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EURASIA; EUROPE;

EUPHYDRYAS MATURNA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 28644452325     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04268.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Baguette, M. 2004. The classical metapopulation theory and the real, natural world: a critical apprisal. - Basic Appl. Ecol. 5: 213-224.
2. Baguette, M. and Schtickzelle, N. 2003. Local population dynamics are important to the conservation of metapopulations in highly fragmented landscapes. - J. Appl. Ecol. 40: 404-412.
3. Baguette, M. and Mennechez, G. 2004. Resource and habitat patches, landscape ecology and metapopulation biology: a consensual viewpoint. - Oikos 106: 399-403.
4. Benes, J. et al. (eds) 2002. Butterflies of the Czech Republic: distribution and conservation I., II. - SOM, Prague.
5. Bergman, K. O. 2001. Population dynamics and the importance of habitat management for conservation of the butterfly Lopinga achine. - J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 1303-1313.
6. Bergman, K. O. and Landin, J. 2002. Population structure and movements of a threatened butterfly (Lopinga achine) in a fragmented landscape in Sweden. - Biol. Conserv. 108: 361-369.
7. Bergman, K. O. and Kindvall, O. 2004. Population viability analysis of the butterfly Lopinga achine in a changing landscape in Sweden. - Ecography 27: 49-58.
8. Boggs, C. L. and Nieminen, M. 2004. Checkerspot reproductive biology. - In: Ehrlich, P. R. and Hanski, I. (eds), On the wings of checkerspots: a model system for population biology. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 92-111.
9. Dennis, R. L. H., Shreeve, T. G. and van Dyck, H. 2003. Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. - Oikos 102: 417-426.
10. Ellner, S. P. and Fussmann, G. 2003. Effects of successional dynamics on metapopulation persistence. - Ecology 84: 882-889.
11. Franken, R. J. and Hik, D. S. 2004. Influence of habitat quality, patch size and connectivity on colonization and extinction dynamics of collared pikas Ochotona collaris. - J. Anim. Ecol. 73: 889-896.
12. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. - Oxford Univ. Press.
13. Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. E. (eds) 1997. Metapopulation biology. Ecology: genetics and evolution. - Academic Press.
14. Hanski, I. and Ovaskainen, O. 2003. Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 64: 119-127.
15. Hanski, I., Kuussaari, M. and Nieminen, M. 1994. Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. - Ecology 75: 747-762.
16. Hanski, I., Alho, J. and Moilanen, A. 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. - Ecology 81: 239-251.
17. Harrison, S. 1989. Long-distance dispersal and colonisation in the bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis. - Ecology 70: 1236-1243.
18. Hastings, A. 2003. Metapopulation persistence with age-dependent disturbance or succession. - Science 301: 1525-1526.
19. Hill, J. K., Thomas, C. D. and Lewis, O. T. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 725-735.
20. Höttinger, H. and Pennerstorfer, J. 1999. Rote Listen ausgewahlter Tiergruppen Niederöstereichs. Tagfalter (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera & Hesperiidae). - Amt der NÖ Landesregierung, Abteilung Naturschutz, St. Pölten.
21. Johnson, M. P. 2000. The influence of patch demographics on metapopulations, with particular reference to successional landscapes. - Oikos 88: 67-74.
22. Konvicka, M. and Kuras, T. 1999. Population structure and the selection of oviposition sites of the endangered butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in the Litovelske Pomoravi, Czech Republic. - J. Insect Conserv. 3: 211-223.
23. Konvicka, M. et al. 2005. For whom the bells toll: demography of the last population of the butterfly Euphydryas maturna in the Czech Republic. - Biologia, in press.
24. Kuras, T. et al. 2003. Dispersal patterns of endemic alpine butterflies with contrasting population structures: Erebia epiphron and E. sudetica. - Popul. Ecol. 45: 115-123.
25. Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M. and Hanski, I. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 791-801.
26. Kuussaari, M. et al. 1998. Allee effect and population dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. - Oikos 82: 384-392.
27. Leon-Cortes, J. L., Lennon, J. J. and Thomas, C. D. 2003. Ecological dynamics of extinct species in empty habitat networks. 1. The role of habitat pattern and quantity, stochasticity and dispersal. - Oikos 102: 449-464.
28. Matter, S. F. et al. 2004. Migration and survival of Parnassius smintheus: detecting effects of habitat for individual butterflies. - Ecol. Appl. 14: 1526-1534.
29. Menendez, R., Gutierrez, D. and Thomas, C. D. 2002. Migration and Allee effects in the six-spot burnet moth Zygaena filipendulae. - Ecol. Entomol. 27: 317-325.
30. Mennechez, G., Schtickzelle, N. and Baguette, M. 2003. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a continuous and a highly fragmented landscape. - Landscape Ecol. 18: 279-291.
31. Mennechez, G. et al. 2004. Modelling mortality and dispersal: consequences of parameter generalisation on metapopulation modelling. - Oikos 106: 243-252.
32. Moilanen, A. 1999. Patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics: efficient parameter estimation using implicit statistical inference. - Ecology 80: 1031-1043.
33. Nurnberger, B. 1996. Local dynamics and dispersal in a structured population of the whirligig beetle Dineutus assimilis. - Oecologia 106: 325-336.
34. O'Brien, D. M., Boggs, C. L. and Fogel, M. L. 2004. Making eggs from nectar: the role of life history and dietary carbon turnover in butterfly reproductive resource allocation. - Oikos 105: 279-291.
35. Ovaskainen, O. 2004. Habitat-specific movement parameters estimated using mark-recapture data and a diffusion model. - Ecology 85: 242-257.
36. Petit, S. et al. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches. - Oikos 92: 491-500.
37. Pretscher, P. and Binot-Hafke, M. 2003. Germany. - In: Van Swaay, C. A. M. and Warren, M. S. (eds), Prime butterfly areas in Europe: priority sites for conservation. Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, the Netherlands, pp. 253-277.
38. Ricketts, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. - Am. Nat. 158: 87-99.
39. Schtickzelle, N. and Baguette, M. 2003. Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. - J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 533-545.
40. Schtickzelle, N. and Baguette, M. 2004. Metapopulation viability analysis of the bog fritillary butterfly using RAMAS/GIS. - Oikos 104: 277-290.
41. Thomas, J. A. et al. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. - Proc. R. Soc. B 268: 1791-1796.
42. Valimaki, P. and Itamies, J. 2003. Migration of the clouded Apollo butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne in a network of suitable habitats-effects of patch characteristics. - Ecography 26: 679-691.
43. Wahlberg, N. 2001. On the status of the scarce fritillary Euphydryas maturna (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Finland. - Entomol. Fenn. 12: 244-250.
44. Wahlberg, N., Moilanen, A. and Hanski, I. 1996. Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. - Science 273: 1536-1538.
45. Wahlberg, N., Klemetti, T. and Hanski, I. 2002a. Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. - Ecography 25: 224-232.
46. Wahlberg, N. et al. 2002b. Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies. - Oecologia 130: 33-43.
47. Wang, R. et al. 2004. Contrasting movement patterns in two species of checquerspot butterflies, Euphydryas aurinia and Melitaea phoebe, in the same habitat network. - Ecol. Entomol. 29: 367-374.
48. Warren, M. S. 1987. The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia. III. Population dynamics and the effect of habitat management. - J. Appl. Ecol. 24: 499-513.
49. Warren, M. S. and Key, R. S. 1991. Woodlands: past, present and potential for insects. - In: Collins, N. M. and Thomas, J. A. (eds), The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, pp. 155-212.
50. Weidemann, H. J. 1986. Tagfalter 1. Entwicklung-Lebensweise. - Neumann-Neudamm, Melsungen.