Scale dependence of emigration rates

Ecology

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 320-327

  Englund, Göran ^a   Hambäck, Peter A ^b  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Emigration; Extinction risk; Insects; Meta analysis; Metapopulation models; Patch networks; Patch size; Scale dependence

Indexed keywords

EMIGRATION; METAPOPULATION; PATCH SIZE; POPULATION MODELING; SCALE EFFECT;

HEXAPODA; INSECTA;

EID: 1542778502     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/03-3039     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bach, C. E. 1988. Effects of host plant patch size on herbivore density: underlying mechanisms. Ecology 69:1103-1117.
2. Baguette, M., S. Petit, and F. Queva. 2000. Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation. Journal of Animal Ecology 37:100-108.
3. Bergman, K.-L., and J. Landin. 2001. Distribution of occupied and vacant sites and migration of Lopinga achine (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) in a fragmented landscape. Biological Conservation 102:183-190.
4. Doak, P. 2000. Population consequences of restricted dispersal for an insect herbivore in a subdivided habitat. Ecology 81:1828-1841.
5. Englund, G. 1997. Importance of spatial scale and prey movements in predator caging experiments. Ecology 78:2316-2325.
6. Englund, G., S. D. Cooper, and O. Sarnelle. 2001. Application of a model of scale dependence to quantify scale domains in open predation experiments. Oikos 92:501-514.
7. Englund, G., and P. Hambäck. 2004. Scale-dependence of movement rates in stream invertebrates. Oikos, in press.
8. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapppulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
9. Hanski, I., J. Alho, and A. Moilanen. 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. Ecology 81:239-251.
10. Hastings, A., and G. Sugihara. 1993. Fractals, a user's guide for the natural sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
11. Hedges, L. V., and I. Olkin. 1985. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
12. Heino, M., and I. Hanski. 2001. Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. American Naturalist 157:495-511.
13. Hill, J. K., C. D. Thomas, and O. T. Lewis. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. Journal of Animal Ecology 65:725-735.
14. Hjermann, D. Ø. 2000. Spatial ecology of the bush-cricket Decticus verrucivorus: movement, metapopulation dynamics and genetic variation in patchy and linear habitats. Dissertation. University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
15. Kareiva, P. 1985. Finding and losing host plants by Phyllotreta: patch size and surrounding habitat. Ecology 66: 1809-1816.
16. Kareiva, P., and G. Odell. 1987. Swarms of predators exhibit "preytaxis" if individual predators use aera-restricted research. American Naturalist 130:233-270.
17. Kiridvall, O., and A. Petersson. 2000. Consequences of modelling interpatch migration as a function of patch geometry when predicting metapopulation extinction risk. Ecological Modelling 129:101-109.
18. Krummel, J. R., R. H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, R. V. O'Neill, and P. R. Coleman. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48:321-324.
19. Kuussaari, M., M. Nieminen, and I. Hanski. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 791-801.
20. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15:237-240.
21. Mendez, M., D. Gutierrez, and C. D. Thomas. 2002. Migration and Allee effects in the six-spotted burnet moth Zygaena fillipendulae. Ecological Entomology 27:317-325.
22. Nieminen, M. 1996. Migration of moth species in a network of small islands. Oecologia 108:643-651.
23. Petit, S., A. Moilanen, I. A. Hanski, and M. Baguette. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches. Oikos 92:491-500.
24. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. 2002. Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
25. Rex, K. D., and G. P. Malanson. 1990. The fractional shape of forest patches. Landscape Ecology 4:249-258.
26. Sheil, D., D. F. R. P. Burslem, and D. Alder. 1995. The interpretation and misinterpretation of mortality rate measures. Journal of Ecology 83:331-333.
27. Stamps, J. A., M. Buechner, and V. V. Krishnan. 1987. The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat. American Naturalist 129: 533-552.
28. Sutcliffe, O. L., C. D. Thomas, and D. Peggie. 1997. Area-dependent migration by ringlet butterflies generates a mixture of patchy population and metapopulation attributes. Oecologia 109:229-234.
29. Thomas, C. D., and W. E. Kunin. 1999. The spatial structure of populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 68:647-657.
30. Turchin, P. 1991. Translating foraging movements in heterogeneous environments into the spatial distribution of foragers. Ecology 72:1253-1266.
31. Wahlberg, N., T. Klemetti, V. Selonen, and I. Hanski. 2002. Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies. Oecologia 130:33-43.