Density-dependent dispersal in the Glanville fritillary, Melitaea cinxia

Oikos

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 465-472

  Enfjäll, Karin ^a   Leimar, Olof ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; DISPERSAL; EMIGRATION; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION;

LEPIDOPTERA; MELITAEA CINXIA; NYMPHALIDAE;

EID: 14844284612     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13261.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aars, J. and Ims, R. A. 2000. Population dynamic and genetic consequences of spatial density-dependent dispersal in patchy populations. - Am. Nat. 155: 252-265.
2. Baguette, M., Convie, I. and Neve, G. 1996. Male density affects female spatial behaviour in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. - Acta Oecol. 17: 225-232.
3. Baguette, M., Vansteenwegen, C., Convi, I. et al. 1998. Sex-biased density-dependent migration in a metapopulation of the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. - Acta Oecol. 19: 17-24.
4. Baker, R. R. 1969. The evolution of the migratory habit in butterflies. - J. Anim. Ecol. 38: 703-746.
5. Baker, R. R. 1984. The dilemma: when and how to go or stay. - In: Vane-Wright, R. I. and Ackery, P. R. (eds), The biology of butterflies. Academic Press, pp. 279-296.
6. Brunzel, S. 2002. Experimental density-related emigration in the cranberry fritillary Boloria aquilionaris. - J. Insect Behav. 15: 739-750.
7. Dethier, V. G. and MacArthur, R. H. 1964. A field's capacity to support a butterfly population. - Nature 201: 728-729.
8. Gilbert, L. E. and Singer, M. C. 1973. Dispersal and gene flow in a butterfly species. - Am. Nat. 107: 58-72.
9. Gustafson, E. J. and Gardner, R. H. 1996. The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. - Ecology 77: 94-107.
10. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. - Oxford Univ. Press.
11. Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. 1997. Metapopulation biology. - Academic Press.
12. Hanski, I., Kuussaari, M. and Nieminen, M. 1994. Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. - Ecology 75: 747-762.
13. Hanski, I., Breuker, C. J., Schöps, K. et al. 2002. Population history and life history influence the migration rate of female Glanville fritillary butterflies. - Oikos 98: 87-97.
14. Heino, M. and Hanski, I. 2001. Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. - Am. Nat. 157: 495-511.
15. Henriksen, H. J. and Kreutzer, I. 1982. The butterflies of Scandinavia in nature. - Skandinavisk Bogforlag A/S.
16. Ims, R. A. and Yaccoz, N. G. 1997. Studying transfer process in metapopulations: emigration, migration, and colonization. - In: Hanski, I. A. and Gilpin, M. E. (eds), Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, pp. 247-265.
17. Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M. and Hanski, I. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 791-801.
18. Kuussaari, M., Saccheri, I., Camara, M. et al. 1998. Allee effect and population dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. - Oikos 82: 384-392.
19. McCullagh, P and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models, 2nd ed. - Chapman and Hall/CRC.
20. Merckx, T., Van Dyck, H., Karlsson, B. et al. 2003. The evolution of movements and behaviour at boundaries in different landscapes: a common arena experiment with butterflies. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 270: 1815-1821.
21. Mennechez, G., Schtickzelle, N. and Baguette, M. 2003. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a continuous and a highly fragmented landscape. - Landscape Ecol. 18: 279-291.
22. Norberg, U., Enfjäll, K. and Leimar, O. 2002. Habitat exploration in butterflies - an outdoor cage experiment. - Evol. Ecol. 16: 1-14.
23. Odendaal, F. J., Iwasa, Y. and Ehrlich, P. R. 1985. Duration of female availability and its effect on butterfly mating systems. - Am. Nat. 125: 673-678.
24. Odendaal, F. J., Turchin, P. and Stermitz, F. R. 1989. Influence of host-plant density and male harassment on the distribution of female Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae). - Oecologia 78: 283-288.
25. Okubo, A., Hastings, A. and Powell, T. 2001. Population dynamics in temporal and spatial domains. - In: Okubo, A. and Levin, S. A. (eds), Diffusion and ecological problems, 2nd ed. Springer, pp. 298-373.
26. Ray, C., Gilpin, M. and Smith, A. T. 1991. The effect of conspecific attraction on metapopulation dynamics. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 123-134.
27. Ricketts, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. - Am. Nat. 158: 87-99.
28. Schtickzelle, N. and Baguette, M. 2003. Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationship in fragmented landscapes with low quality matrix. - J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 533-545.
29. Shapiro, A. M. 1970. The role of sexual behavior in density-related dispersal of pierid butterflies. - Am. Nat. 104: 367-372.
30. Shreeve, T. G. 1995. Butterfly mobility. - In: Pullin, A. S. (ed.), Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman and Hall, pp. 37-45.
31. Silva, J. A. L., de Castro, M. L. and Justo, D. A. R. 2001. Stability in a metapopulation model with density-dependent dispersal. - B. Math. Biol. 63: 485-505.
32. Stamps, J. A., Buechner, M. and Krishnan, V. V. 1987. The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat. - Am. Nat. 129: 533-552.
33. Warren, M. S. 1987. The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia. 2. Adult-population structure and mobility. - J. Appl. Ecol. 24: 483-498.