Sex-biased density-dependent migration in a metapopulation of the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia

Acta Oecologica

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 17-24

  Baguette, Michel ^a   Vansteenwegen, Christian ^a   Convi, Isabelle ^a   Nève, Gabriel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Habitat fragmentation; Migration rate; Polygyny

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; DENSITY-DEPENDENCE; METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS; MIGRATION; SEX BIAS;

LEPIDOPTERA; NYMPHALIDAE; PROCLOSSIANA EUNOMIA;

EID: 0031898644     PISSN: 1146609X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1146-609X(98)80004-0     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. [1] Baguette M., Goffart P., Liste rouge des Lue, Bull. Ann. Soc. R. b. Ent. 127 (1991) 147-151.
2. [2] Baguette M., Neve G., Adult movements between populations in the specialist butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Ecol. Entomol. 19 (1994) 1-5.
3. [3] Baguette M., Neve G., Convie I., Male density affects female spatial behaviour in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Acta Oecol. 17 (1996) 225-232.
4. [4] Brussaal P.F., Ehrlich P.R., Singer, M.C., Adult movements and population structure in Euphydryas editha, Evolution, 28 (1974) 408-415.
5. [5] Dennis R.L.H., Bramley M.J., The influence of man and climate on dispersion patterns within a population of adult Lasiommata megera (L.) (Satyridae) at Brereton Heath, Cheshire (U.K.). Nota Lepid, 8 (1985) 309-324.
6. [6] Descimon H., L'acclimatation de Lbiog
7. [7] Hanski I., A practical model of metapopulation dynamics, J. An. Ecol. 63 (1994a) 151-162.
8. [8] Hanski I., Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9 (1994b) 131-135.
9. [9] Hanski I., Thomas C.D., Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: a spatially explicit model applied to butterflies, Biol. Cons. 68 (1994) 167-180.
10. [10] Hanski I., Kuussaari M., Nieminen M., Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia, Ecology 75 (1994) 747-762.
11. [11] Hanski I., Pakkala T., Kuussaari M., Lei G., Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape, Oikos 72 (1995) 21-28.
12. [12] Hines J.E., Program 'JOLLY'; User Instructions (Draft), US Fish and Wildlife Service, Parturent Wildlife Center, Laurel Maryland, 1988.
13. [13] IUCN, The I.U.C.N. Invertebrate Red Data Book, Unwin, Old Working, 1983.
14. [14] Nève G., Barascud B., Hughes R.M., Aubert J., Descimon H., Lebrun P., Aguette, M., Dispersal, colonization and metapopulation structure in the vulnerable butterfly Proclossiana eunomia, J. Appl. Ecol. 33 (1996) 14-22.
15. [15] Odendaal F.J., Iwasa Y., Ehrlich P.R., Duration of female availability and its effect on butterfly mating systems, Am. Nat. 125 (1985) 673-378.
16. [16] Odendaal F.J., Turchin P., Stermitz F.R., Influence of host-plant density and male harassment on the distribution of female Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae), Oecologia 78 (1989) 283-288.
17. [17] Shapiro A.M., The role of sexual behavior in density-related dispersal of Pierid butterflies, Am. Nat. 104 (1970) 367-373.
18. [18] Shreeve T.G., Adult behaviour, in: Dennis R.L.H. (ed.), The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992, pp. 22-45.
19. [19] Watt W.B., Han D., Tabashnik B.E., Population structure of Pierid butterflies. II. A native population of Colias philodice eriphyle in Colorado, Oecologia 44 (1979) 44-52.