Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: A butterfly biology viewpoint

Oikos

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 417-426

  Dennis, Roger L H ^a,b   Shreeve, Tim G ^c   Van Dyck, Hans ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Oxford Brookes Univ ^*

^c OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; BUTTERFLY; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; HABITAT; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY;

INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 0041709169     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.12492.x     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Akcakaya, H. R. 2001. Linking population-level risk assessment with landscape and habitat models. - Sci. Total Environ. 274: 283-291.
2. Baker, R. R. 1969. The evolution of the migratory habitat in butterflies. - J. Anim. Ecol. 38: 703-746.
3. Baker, R. R. 1978. The evolutionary ecology of animal migration. - Hodder and Stoughton.
4. Baker, R. R. 1984. The dilemma: when and how to go or stay. - In: Vane-Wright, R. I. and Ackery, P. R. (eds), The biology of butterflies. Academic Press, pp. 279-296.
5. Boggs, C. L. and Ross, C. H. 1993. The effects of adult food limitation on life history traits in Speyeria mormonia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). - Evolution 74: 433-441.
6. Boughton, D. A. 1999. Empirical evidence for complex source-sink dynamics with alternative states in a butterfly metapopulation. - Ecology 80: 2727-2739.
7. Brakefield, P. M. 1982. Ecological studies on the butterfly Maniola jurtina in Britain. I. Adult behaviour, microdistribution and dispersal. - J. Anim. Ecol. 51: 713-726.
8. Calow, P. 1999. Blackwell's concise encyclopedia of ecology. - Blackwell Sciences.
9. Clinchy, M., Haydon, D. T. and Smith, A. T. 2002. Pattern does not equal process: what does patch occupancy really tell us about metapopulation dynamics? - Am. Nat. 159: 351-362.
10. Collin, P. H. 1988. Dictionary of ecology and the environment. - Peter Collin Publishing.
11. Conrad, K. F., Woiwod, I. P. and Perry, J. N. 2002. Long term decline in abundance and distribution of the garden tiger moth (Arctia caja) in Great Britain. - Biol. Conserv. 106: 329-337.
12. Conradt, L., Bodsworth, E. J., Roper, T. J. and Thomas, C. D. 2000. Non-randon dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267: 1505-1510.
13. Conradt, L., Roper, T. J. and Thomas, C. D 2001. Dispersal behaviour of individuals in metapopulations of two British butterflies. - Oikos 95: 416-424.
14. Cook, L. M. and Sarsam, V. 1981. Polymorphism in the moth Noctua pronuba (L.). - Heredity 46: 443-447.
15. Courtney, S. P. and Duggan, A. E. 1983. The population biology of the orange-tip butterfly Anthocharis cardamines in Britain. - Ecol. Entomol. 8: 271-281.
16. Delibes, M., Ferreras, P. and Gaona, P. 2001. Attractive sinks, or how individual behaviour decisions determine source-sink dynamics. - Ecol. Lett. 4: 401-403.
17. den Boer, P. J. and Reddingius, J. 1996. Regulation and stabilization paradigms in population ecology. - Chapman and Hall.
18. Dennis, R. L. H. 1977. The British butterflies. Their origin and establishment. - E. W. Classey.
19. Dennis, R. L. H. 1992. The ecology of butterflies in Britain. - Oxford Univ. Press.
20. Dennis, R. L. H. 1993. Butterflies and climate change. - Manchester Univ. Press.
21. Dennis, R. L. H. and Bardell, P. 1996. The impact of extreme weather on Great Orme populations of Hipparchia semele (LINNAEUS, 1758) and Plebejus argus (LINNAEUS, 1758) (Papilionoidea: Satyrinae and Lycaenidae): hindsight, inference and lost opportunities. - Entomol. Gaz. 47: 211-225.
22. Dennis, R. L. H. and Eales, H. T. 1997. Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Lepidoptera: Satyridae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation. - J. Insect Conserv. 1: 167-176.
23. Dennis, R. L. H. and Eales, H. T. 1999. Probability of patch site occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Müller) (Lepidoptera: Satryinae) determined from geographical and ecological data. - Biol. Conserv. 87: 295-301.
24. Dennis, R. L. H. and Shreeve, T. G. 1996. Butterflies on British and Irish offshore islands. - Gem Publisching Company.
25. Douwes, P. 1976. Distribution of a population of the butterfly Heodes virgaureae L. (Lycaeinidae). - Oikos 26: 332-340.
26. Dover, J. W. 1996. Factors affecting the distribution of satyrid butterflies on arable farmland. - J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 723-734.
27. Dover, J. W., Sparks, T. H. and Greatorex-Davies, J. N. 1997. The importance of shelter for butterflies in open landscapes. - J. Insect Conserv. 1: 89-97.
28. Dover, J., Sparks, T., Clarke, S. et al. 2000. Linear features and butterflies: the importance of green lanes. - Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 80: 227-242.
29. Dunning, J. B., Danielson, B. J. and Pulliam, H. R. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. - Oikos 65: 169-175.
30. Elton, C. S. 1966. The pattern of animal communities. - Methuen.
31. Erhardt, A. and Thomas, J. A. 1991. Lepidoptera as indicators of change in semi-natural grasslands of lowland and upland in Europe. - In: Collins, N. M. and Thomas, J. A. (eds), The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, pp. 213-236.
32. Fleishman, E., Ray, C., Sjogren-Gulve, P. et al. 2002. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. - Conserv. Biol. 16: 706-716.
33. Forman, R. T. T. and Godron, M. 1986. Landscape ecology. - Wiley.
34. Freckleton, R. P and Watkinson, A. R. 2002. Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. - J. Ecol. 90: 419-434.
35. Fry, G. 1995. Landscape ecology of insect movement in arable ecosytems. - In: Glen, D. M., Greaves, M. P. and Anderson, H. M. (eds), Ecology and integrated farming systems. John Wiley and Sons, pp. 177-202.
36. Grime, J. P. 1974. Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. - Nature 250: 26-31.
37. Gutierrez, D., Thomas, C. D. and Leon-Cortes, J. L. 1999. Dispersal, distribution, patch network and metapopulation dynamcis of the dingy skipper butterfly (Erynnis tages). - Oecologia 121: 506-517.
38. Gutiérrez, D., León-Cortés, J. L., Menéndez, R. et al. 2001. Metapopulations of four lepidopteran herbivores on a single host plant, Lotus corniculatus. - Ecology 82: 1371-1386.
39. Hall, L. S., Krausman, P. R. and Morrison, M. L. 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. - Wildlife Soc. Bull. 25: 173-182.
40. Hanski, I. 2001. Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology. - Naturwissenschaften 88: 372-381.
41. Hanski, I. A. and Gilpin, M. E. 1997. Metapopulation biology. Ecology, genetics, and evolution. - Academic Press.
42. Hanski, I. and Singer, M. C. 2001. Extinction-colonization dynamics and host-plant choice in butterfly metapopulations. - Am. Nat. 158: 341-353.
43. Hardy, P. B. and Dennis, R. L. H. 1999. The impact of urban development on butterflies within a city region. - Biodiv. Conserv. 8: 1261-1279.
44. Harrison, S. and Taylor, A. D. 1997. Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. - In: Hanski, I. A. and Gilpin, M. E. (eds), Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, pp. 27-42.
45. Haslett, J. R. 1990. Geographic information systems: a new approach to habitat definition and the study of distributions. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 214-218.
46. Heino, M. and Hanski, I. 2001. Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. - Am. Nat. 157: 495-511.
47. Hill, J. K., Thomas, C. D. and Lewis, O. T. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 725-735.
48. King, A. W. and With, K. A. 2002. Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do spatial pattern and dispersal behaviour really matter? - Ecol. Model. 147: 23-39.
49. Kluge, A. G. 1990. Species as historical individuals. - Biol. Philos. 5: 417-431.
50. Lincoln, R. J., Boxshall, G. A. and Clark, P. F. 1982. A dictionary of ecology, evolution and systematics. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
51. Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J. and Rhind, D. W. 2001. Geographic information systems and science. - John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
52. Luoto, M., Kuussaari, M., Rita, H. et al. 2001. Determinants of distribution and abundance in the clouded apollo butterfly: a landscape ecological approach. - Ecography 24: 601-617.
53. Moilanen, A. 2002. Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and application. - Oikos 96: 516-530.
54. New, T. R. 1997. Are Lepidoptera an effective 'umbrella group' for biodiversity conservation? - J. Insect Conserv. 1: 5-12.
55. Odum, E. P. 1963. Ecology. - Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
56. Opdam, P., Foppen, R. and Vos, C. 2001. Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. - Landscape Ecol. 16: 767-779.
57. Peterson, M. A. 1997. Host plant phenology and butterfly dispersal: causes and consequences of uphill movement. - Ecology 78: 167-180.
58. Ricketts, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. - Am. Nat. 158: 87-99.
59. Rodwell, J. S. 1991. et seq. British plant communities, Vols, 1-5. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
60. Roland, J., Keyghobadi, N. and Fownes, S. 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. - Ecology 81: 1642-1653.
61. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
62. Shafer, C. L. 2001. Inter-reserve distance. - Biol. Conserv. 100: 215-227.
63. Shreeve, T. G., Dennis, R. L. H. and Williams, W. R. 1996a. Uniformity of wing spotting of Maniola jurtina (L.) (Lep., Satyrinae) in relation to environmental heterogeneity. - Nota Lepidopterologica 18: 77-92.
64. Shreeve, T. G., Dennis, R. L. H. and Pullin, A. S. 1996b. How marginal is the British butterfly fauna and what are the implications for research opportunities and conservation? - Biodiv. Conserv. 5: 1131-1141.
65. Shreeve, T. G., Dennis, R. L. H., Roy, D. B. and Moss, D. 2001. An ecological classification of British butterflies: ecological attributes and biotope occupancy. - J. Insect Conserv. 5: 145-161.
66. Singer, M. C. 1972. Complex components of habitat suitability within a butterfly colony. - Science 176: 75-77.
67. Southwood, T. R. E. 1962. Migration of terrestrial arthopods in relation to habitat. - Biol. Rev. 37: 171-214.
68. Southwood, T. R. E. 1977. Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies. - J. Anim. Ecol. 46: 337-365.
69. Southwood, T. R. E. 1988. Tactics, strategies and templets. - Oikos 52: 3-18.
70. Sparks, T. H., Dover, J. W., Warren, M. S. and Cox, R. 1995. How well can we model the distribution of butterflies at the landscape scale? - In: Griffiths, G. H. (ed.), Landscape ecology: theory and application. IALE, UK, pp. 24-31.
71. Sutcliffe, O. L., Thomas, C. D. and Peggie, D. 1997. Area-dependent migration by ringlet butterflies generates a mixture of patchy population and metapopulation attributes. - Oecologia 109: 229-234.
72. Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K. and Merriam, G. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. - Oikos 68: 571-573.
73. Thomas, C. D., Bodsworth, E. J., Wilson, R. J. et al. 2001. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. - Nature 411: 577-581.
74. Thomas, C. D. and Harrison, S. 1992. Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species. - J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 437-446.
75. Thomas, C. D and Kunin, W. E. 1999. The spatial structure of populations. - J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 647-657.
76. Thomas, C. D., Warren, M. S. and Thomas, J. A. 1992. Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. - Oecologia 92: 563-567.
77. Thomas, C. D., Wilson, R. J. and Lewis, O. T. 2002. Short-term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulation. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269: 563-569.
78. Thomas, J. A. 1991. Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies. - In: Spellerberg, I. F., Goldsmith, F. B. and Morris, M. G. (eds), The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 149-197.
79. Thomas, J. A. 1993. Holocene climate changes and warm man-made refugia may explain why a sixth of British butterflies possess unnatural early-successional habitats. - Ecography 16: 278-284.
80. Thomas, J. A. 1994. Why small cold-blooded insects pose different conservation problems to birds in modern landscapes. - Ibis 137: 112-119.
81. Thomas, J. A., Bourn, N. A. D., Clarke, R. T. et al. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268: 1791-1796.
82. Thomas, J. A., Rose, R. J., Clarke, R. T. et al. 1999. Interspecific variation in habitat availability among ectothermic animals near their climatic limits and their centres of range. - Funct. Ecol. 13: 55-64.
83. Topping, C. and Jepsen, J. U. 2002. Simulation models of animal behaviour are useful tools in landscape and species management. - IALE Bulletin 20: 1-2.
84. Turner, M. G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 171-197.
85. Vandermeer, J. and Carvajal, R. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix. - Am. Nat. 158: 211-220.
86. van Swaay, C. and Warren, M. S. 1999. Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and environment, No. 99. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.
87. Wahlberg, N., Klemetti, T. and Hanski, I. 2002. Dynamic populationns in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. - Ecography 25: 224-232.
88. Warren, M. S. 1994. The UK status and suspected metapopulation structure of a threatened European butterfly, the marsh fritillary Eurodryas aurinia. - Biol. Conserv. 67: 239-249.
89. Weddell, B. J. 2002. Conserving living natural resources. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
90. Whittaker, R. H., Levin, S. A. and Root, R. B. 1973. Niche, habitat, and ecotope. - Am. Nat. 107: 321-338.
91. Wiens, J. A. 1996. Wildlife in patchy environments: metapopulations, mosaics, and management. - In: McCullough, D. R. (ed.), Metapopulations and wildlife conservation. Island Press, Washington D.C, pp. 53-84.
92. Wiens, J. A. 1997. Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. - In: Hanski, I. A. and Gilpin, M. E. (eds), Metapopulation biology. Ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, pp. 43-62.
93. Wiklund, C. 1977. Oviposition, feeding and spatial separation of breeding and foraging habitats in a population of Leptidea sinapis (Lepidoptera). - Oikos 28: 56-68.
94. Wilson, R. J., Ellis, S. M., Baker, J. S. et al. in press. Metapopulations of metapopulations near the range margins of Aricia butterfly species. - Ecology.