The old switcheroo: When target environmental sounds elicit a novelty P3

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 115, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1359-1367

  Cycowicz, Yael M ^a   Friedman, David ^a  

^a NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental sounds; Event related brain potential; Novelty P3; Oddball

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ENVIRONMENT; HEARING; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SCALP; SOUND;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 2342460333     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Courchesne E., Hillyard S.A., Galambos R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 39:(2):1975;131-143
2. Cycowicz Y.M., Friedman D. A developmental study of the effect of temporal order on the ERPs elicited by novel environmental sounds. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 103:1997;304-318
3. Cycowicz Y.M., Friedman D. Effect of sound familiarity on the event-related potentials elicited by novel environmental sounds. Brain Cogn. 36:1998;30-51
4. Cycowicz Y.M., Friedman D. The effect of intention to learn novel, environmental sounds on the novelty P3 and old/new recognition memory. Biol Psychol. 50:1999;35-60
5. Cycowicz Y.M., Friedman D., Rothstein M. An ERP developmental study of repetition priming by auditory novel stimuli. Psychophysiology. 33:(6):1996;680-690
6. Debener S., Kranczioch C., Herrmann C.S., Engel A.K. Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention. Int J Psychophysiol. 46:(1):2002;77-84
7. Fabiani M., Friedman D. Changes in brain activity patterns in aging: the novelty oddball. Psychophysiology. 32:(6):1995;579-594
8. Fabiani M., Kazmerski V.A., Cycowicz Y.M., Friedman D. Naming norms for brief environmental sounds: effects of age and dementia. Psychophysiology. 33:(4):1996;462-475
9. Friedman D., Simpson G.V. ERP amplitude and scalp distribution to target and novel events: effects of temporal order in young, middle-aged and older adults. Cogn Brain Res. 2:(1):1994;49-63
10. Friedman D., Hamberger M., Ritter W. Event-related potentials as indicators of repetition priming in young and older adults: amplitude, duration, and scalp distribution. Psychol Aging. 8:(1):1993;120-125
11. Friedman D., Simpson G., Hamberger M. Age-related changes in scalp topography to novel and target stimuli. Psychophysiology. 30:(4):1993;383-396
12. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Gaeta H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 25:(4):2001;355-373
13. Gaeta H., Friedman D., Hunt G. Stimulus characteristics and task category dissociate the anterior and posterior aspects of the novelty P3. Psychophysiology. 40:(2):2003;198-208
14. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr clin Neurophysiol. 55:1983;468-484
15. Jennings J., Wood C. The epsilon-adjustment procedure for repeated-measures analyses of variance. Psychophysiology. 13:1976;277-278
16. Kazmerski V.A., Friedman D. Repetition of novel stimuli in ERP oddball paradigm: aging effects. J Psychophysiol. 9:1995;298-311
17. Lammers W.J., Badia P. Habituation of P300 to target stimuli. Physiol Behav. 45:(3):1989;595-601
18. McCarthy G., Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 62:1985;203-208
19. Nuwer M.R., Lehmann D., Lopes da Silva F., Matsuoka S., Sutherling W., Vibert J.-F. IFCN guidelines for topographic and frequency analysis of EEGs and EPs. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 91:1994;1-5
20. Perrin P., Pernier J., Bertrand O., Echallier J.F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephlogr clin Neurophysiol. 72:1989;184-187
21. Ranganath C., Rainer G. Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nat Rev Neurosci. 4:(3):2003;193-202
22. Romero R., Polich J. P3(00) habituation from auditory and visual stimuli. Physiol Behav. 59:(3):1996;517-522
23. Ruchkin D.S., Johnson R.J., Friedman D., et al. Scaling is necessary when making comparisons between shapes of event-related potentials topographies: a reply to Haig et al. Psychophysiology. 36:1999;832-834
24. Sokolov E.N. The orienting response, and future directions of its development. Pavlov J Biol Sci. 25:(3):1990;142-150
25. Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., John E.R. Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science. 150:1965;1187-1188