The proximal-virtual team continuum: A study of performance

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 794-801

  Workman, Michael ^a  

^a FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROXIMAL-VIRTUAL TEAM CONTINUUM; SOCIAL-TECHNICAL SKILLS; TASK-RELATIONSHIP ORIENTATION;

PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 34247110429     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20545     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aiken, L.S. & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Bailey, D.E., & Kurland, N.B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383-400.
3. Barker, J.R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408-437.
4. Bell, B.S., & Kozlowski, S.W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management, 27, 14-49.
5. Burns, T., & Stalker, G.M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
6. Chatman, J.A., & Flynn, F.J. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 956-974.
7. Chen, Y, Brokner, J., & Katz, J. (1998). Toward an explanation of cultural differences in in-group favoritism: The role of individual versus collective primacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1490-1502.
8. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
9. Conner, D.S. (2003). Social comparison in virtual work environments: An examination of contemporary referent selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 133-147.
10. Daft, R.L. (1998). Essentials of organization theory and design. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.
11. Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements. Media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-570.
12. Daniels, K., Lamond, D., & Standen, P. (2001). Teleworking: Frame-works for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 1158-1185.
13. Deutch, M., & Gerard, H.B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
14. Earley, P.C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26-49.
15. Ellison, N.B. (1999). Social impacts - New perspectives on telework. Social Science Computer Review, 17, 338-356.
16. Erben, R.F., & Dafler, M.N. (1998). Chances and risks of telework. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 40, 191-209.
17. Fritz, M.B.W., Narasimhan, S., & Rhee, H.S. (1996). The impact of remote work on informal organizational communication. In IEEE Proceedings of the 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 3 (pp. 188-126).
18. Fussell, S.R., & Benimoff, I. (1995). Social and cognitive processes in interpersonal communication: Implications for advanced telecommunications technologies. Human Factors, 37, 228-250.
19. Gagne, C., & Godin, G. (2000). The theory of planned behavior: Some measurement issues concerning belief-based variables. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 2173-2193.
20. Gass, R.H., & J.S. Seiter. (1999). Persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
21. Gibson, C.B., & Cohen, S.G. (2003). Virtual teams the work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Griffin, M.A., Patterson, M. G., & West, M.A. (2001). Job satisfaction and teamwork: The role of supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 537-550.
23. Griffith, T.L., Sawyer, J.E., & Neale, M.A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 265-287.
24. Heald, M.R., Contractor, N.S., Koehly, L.M., & Wasserman, S. (1998). Formal and emergent predictors of coworkers' perceptual congruence on an organization's social structure. Human Communication Research, 24, 536-563.
25. Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. (2004). Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 1-28.
26. Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D.D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286-316.
27. James, L.R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229.
28. James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.
29. Janis, I. (1982) Groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
30. Janis, I., & Mann, L. (1979). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. NY: The Free Press Houghton Mifflin.
31. Jehng, J.J. (1997). The psycho-social processes and cognitive effects of peer-based collaborative interactions with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 19-46.
32. Karau, S.J., & Williams, K.D. (1993) Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
33. Kraut, R.E., Rice, R.E., Cool, C., & Fish, R.S. (1998). Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organization Science, 9, 437-453.
34. Lim, K.H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). The effect of multimedia on perceived equivocality and perceived usefulness of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 24, 449-471.
35. Martins, L.M., Gibson, L.L., & Maynard, M.T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805-835.
36. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R.E., Malhotra, A., King, N., & Ba, S. (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24, 569-600.
37. Maznevski, M.L., & Chudoba, K.M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11, 473-492.
38. Mohammed, S., Mathieu, J.E., & Bartlett, A.L. (2002). Technical-administrative task performance, leadership task performance, and contextual performance: Considering the influence of team- and task-related composition variables. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 795-814.
39. Montoya-Weiss, M.M., Massey, A.P., & Song, M. (2001). Getting IT together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1251-1262.
40. Moorhead, G., Ference, R., & Neck, C.P. (1991). Group decision fiascoes continue: Space shuttle Challenger and a revised groupthink framework. Human Relations, 44, 539-550.
41. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R.M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42. Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125-135.
43. Murninghan, J.K. (1981, February). Group decision making: What strategies should you use? Management Review, 61-81.
44. Myers, D.G., & Arenson, S.J. (1972) Enhancement of dominant risk tendencies in-group discussion. Psychological Science, 6, 10-19.
45. Myers, D.G., & Bishop, G.D. (1970). Discussion effects on racial attitudes. Psychological Science, 169, 778-779.
46. Prentice, D.A., & Miller, D.T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243-256.
47. Raghuram, S. (1996). Knowledge creation in the telework context. International Journal of Technology Management, 11, 859-870.
48. Rahim, M.A. (1983). Measurement of organizational conflict, Journal of General Psychology, 109, 189-199.
49. Rogers, E.M., & Kincaid, D.L. (1981). Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
50. Schafer, M., & Crichlow, S. (1996). Antecedents of groupthink: A quantitative study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40, 415-435.
51. Scott, C.R. (1997). Identification with multiple targets in a geographically dispersed organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 491-522.
52. Shaw, J.B., & Barrett-Power, E. (1998). The effects of diversity on small work group processes and performance. Human Relations, 51, 1307-1335.
53. Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of inter-group conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
54. Smith, M.K. (2005). Bruce W. Tuckman - forming, storming, norming and performing in groups. In The encyclopedia of informal education. New York: Porter-Jones.
55. Straus, S., & McGrath, J.E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87-97.
56. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991, September). Computers, networks and work. Scientific American, 128-139.
57. Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Suzuki, S. (1997). Cultural transmission in international organizations. Impact on interpersonal communication patterns in intergroup contexts. Human Communication Research, 24, 147-180.
60. Tabachnick, B.C., & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins.
61. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
62. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel and L.W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
63. Webster, J. (1998, September). Desktop videoteleconferencing: Experiences of complete users, wary users, and non-users. MIS Quarterly, 257-286.
64. Wieland, R. (1999). Mental workload in VDU-assisted office work: Consequences for the design of telework. Zeitschrift Fur Arbeits-Und Organisationaspsychologie, 43, 153-158.
65. Workman, M. (2001). Collectivism, individualism, and cohesion in a team-based occupation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 82-97.
66. Workman, M., Kahnweiler, W., & Bommer, W. (2003). The effects of cognitive style and media on commitment to telework and virtual teams. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 199-219.
67. Zajonc, R.B. (1969). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, Monongraph supplement No. 2, Part 2.