Identification with multiple targets in a geographically dispersed organization

Management Communication Quarterly

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 491-522

  Scott, Craig R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001018178     PISSN: 08933189     EISSN: 15526798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0893318997104004     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 263-295). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
2. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
3. Barge, J. K. (1985, November). Organizational identification and social motivation: Afield descriptive study in two organizations. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.
4. Barker, J. R. (1995, May). Leadership in the unobtrusive organization: Issues and implications. Paper presented to the third annual symposium on work teams, Dallas, TX.
5. Barker, J. R., & Tompkins, P. K. (1994). Identification in the self-managing organization: Characteristics of target and tenure. Human Communication Research, 21, 223-240.
6. Barling, J., Wade, B., & Fullager, C. (1990). Predicting employee commitment to company and union: Divergent models. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 49-61.
7. Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Beauvais, L. L., Scholl, R. W., & Cooper, E. A. (1991). Dual commitment among unionized faculty: A longitudinal investigation. Human Relations, 44, 175-193.
9. Becker, T. E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitrnent: Are they distinctions worth making?Academy of Management Journal, 35, 232-244.
10. Becker, T. E., Randall, D. M., & Riegel, C. D. (1995). The multidimensional view of commitment and the theory of reasoned action: A comparative evaluation. Journal of Management, 21, 617-638.
11. Bemmels, B. (1995). Dual commitment: Unique construct or epiphenomenon?Journal of Labor Research, 16, 401-422.
12. Blau, G., Paul, A., & St. John, N. (1993). On developing a general index of work commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 298-314.
13. Bullis, C. (1991). Communication practices as unobtrusive control: An observational study. Communication Studies, 42, 254-271.
14. Bullis, C., & Tompkins, P. K. (1989). The forest ranger revisited: A study of control practices and identification. Communication Monographs, 56, 287-306.
15. Bullis, C. A., & DiSanza, J. R. (1995, November). "Everybody loves Smokey the Bear": Employee responses to newsletter identification inducements at the U.S. Forest Service. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, San Antonio, TX.
16. Burke, K. (1937). Attitudes toward history. New York: The New Republic.
17. Burke, K. (1950). Rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Cheney, G. (1982). Identification as process and product: A field study. Unpublished master's thesis, Purdue University.
19. Cheney, G. (1983a). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 143-158.
20. Cheney, G. (1983b). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.
21. Cheney, G. (1991). Rhetoric in an organizational society: Managing multiple identities. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
22. Cheney, G., & Christensen, L. T. (in press). Identity at issue: Linkages between "internal" and "external" organizational communication. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), New handbook of organizational communication (2nd ed.).
23. Cheney, G., & Tompkins, P. K. (1987). Coming to terms with organizational identification and commitment. Central States Speech Journal, 38, 1-15.
24. Christensen, L. T., & Cheney, G. (1994). Articulating identity in an organizational age. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 17 (pp. 222-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Cohen, A. (1993). Age and tenure in relation to organizational commitment: Ameta-analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 143-159.
26. Czamiawska-Joerges, B. (1994). Narratives of individual and organizational identity. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 17 (pp. 193-221). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Darden, W. R., Hampton, R., & Howell, R. D. (1989). Career versus organizational commitment: Antecedents and consequences of retail salespeoples' commitment. Journal of Retailing, 65, 80-106.
28. Deal, T., & Kennedy, A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29. DeWine, S., & Daniels, T. (1993). Beyond the snapshot: Setting a research agenda in organizational communication. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 16 (pp. 331-346). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
31. Eisenberg, E. M., & Goodall, H. L., Jr. (1993). Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint. New York: St. Martin's.
32. Fullager, C., & Barling, J. (1991). Predictors and outcomes of different patterns of organizational and union loyalty. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 129-143.
33. Gent, M. J., James, L. R., & Hater, J. J. (1979, September). Predicting organizational identification: An interactional contingencies approach. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, New York.
34. Gorden, W. J., & Infante, D. A. (1991). Test of a communication model of organizational commitment. Communication Quarterly, 39, 144-155.
35. Gregersen, H. B. (1992). Commitments to a parent company and a local work unit during repatriation. Personnel Psychology, 45, 29-54.
36. Gregersen, H. B. (1993). Multiple commitments at work and extrarole behavior during three stages of organizational tenure. Journal of Business Research, 26, 31-47.
37. Hall, D. T., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. T. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 176-190.
38. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
39. Holloman, R. (1991, May/June). Loyalty: How much? To Whom?Industrial Management, pp. 1-2.
40. Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1994). Organizational commitment: One of many commitments or key mediating construct?Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1568-1587.
41. Hunter, J. E., & Lim, T. S. (1987). LIMSTAT. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, Department of Communication, East Lansing.
42. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
43. Kaufman, H. (1960). Theforest ranger: A study in administrative behavior. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
44. Kleinfeld, N. R. (1996, 5 February). The downsizing of workplace security. Austin-American Statesmen, pp. Al-Al, A8-A8.
45. Larkey, L., & Morrill, C. (1995). Organizational commitment as symbolic process. Westen Journal of Communication, 59, 193-213.
46. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
47. Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48, 309-333.
48. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
49. May, S. K. (1995, November). Flying the not-so-friendly skies: Organizational identification and resistance during an airline labor dispute. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, San Antonio, TX.
50. McKenna, J. F (1991, 21 January). Blessed be the tie that binds.. for now. Industry Week. p. 11-11.
51. Moravec, M. (1994, January). The 21st century employer-employee partnership. HR Magazine, pp. 128-128, 126-126.
52. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 4, 224-247.
53. Payne, T. (1995, July). Company loyalty: May it rest in peace. Manage, pp. 30-32.
54. Randall, D. M. (1990). The consequences of organizational commitment: Methodological investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 361-378.
55. Reed, C. S., Young, W. R., & McHugh, P. P. (1994). A comparative look at dual commitment: An international study. Hunan Relations, 47, 1269-1293.
56. Reichers, A. E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10, 465-476.
57. Rewerts, M. A. (1996). Building a newfoundation: Cooperative Extension 2000 implementation plan. Fort Collins: Colorado State University.
58. Rotondi, T., Jr. (1975). Organizational identification: Issues and implications. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 95-109.
59. Rotondi, T., Jr. (1976). Identification, personality needs, and managerial position. Human Relations, 29, 507-515.
60. Rue, L. W., & Byars, L. L. (1986). Management: Theory and application (4th ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
61. Sass, J. S., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Organizational commitment and identification: An examination of conceptual and operational convergence. Western Journal of Communication, 55, 275-293.
62. Schneider, B., Hall, D. T., & Nygren, H. T. (1971). Self image and job characteristics as correlates of changing organizational identification. Human Relations, 24, 397-416.
63. Scott, C. R. (1995a, May). Group decision supportsystems and organizational identification: The effects of anonymity andfacilitation. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, Albuquerque, NM.
64. Scott, C. R. (1995b, November). Self reports and expressions of identification among organizational groups using a group decision support system. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, San Antonio, TX.
65. Scott, C. R., Corman, S. R., & Cheney, G. (1996). Toward a situated action theory of identification shifts in the organization. Unpublished working paper, University of Texas at Austin.
66. Shaub, M. K. (1991). Apsychometric comparison of two organizational commitment scales. Psychological Reports, 68, 419-426.
67. Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
68. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
69. Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259-293.
70. Tompkins, P. K., & Cheney, G. (1983). Account analysis of organizations: Decision making and identification. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 123-146). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
71. Tompkins, P. K., & Cheney, G. (1985). Communication and unobtrusive control in contemporary organizations. In R. D. McPhee & P. K. Tompkins (Eds.), Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions (pp. 179-210). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
72. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
73. Van Maanen, J. (1976). Breaking in: Socialization to work. In R. Dubin (Ed.), Handbook of work organization, and society (pp. 67-130). Chicago: Rand-McNally.
74. Vandenberg, R. J., & Scarpello, V. (1994). A longitudinal assessment of the determinant relationship between employee commitments to the occupation and the organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 535-547.
75. Wallace, J. E. (1993). Professional and organizational commitment: Compatible or incompatible?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 333-349.
76. Witt, L. A. (1993). Reactions to work assignment as predictors of organizational commitment: The moderating effect of occupational identification. Journal of Business Research, 26, 17-30.
77. Yoon, J., Baker, M. R., & Ko, J. (1994). Interpersonal attachment and organizational commitment: Subgroup hypothesis revisited. Hum-an Relations, 47, 329-351.