Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP)

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 564-572

  Mahdi, Ibrahim M ^a   Alreshaid, Khaled ^a  

^a KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

Author keywords

Alternative project delivery methods; Analytical hierarchy process; Construction management agency and construction management at risk; Design bid build; Design build

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; RISK MANAGEMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY; CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AT RISK; DESIGN-BID BUILD;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DESIGN;

EID: 27744450360     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. R.H. Clough Construction contracting 4th ed. 1981 Wiley New York, NY, USA
2. R.D. Gilbreath Managing construction contract 1983 Wiley New York, NY, USA
3. Thomas SR, Macken CL, Chung TH, Kim I. Measuring the impact of delivery system on the project performance - design-build and design-bid-build. Technical report, NIST, GCR 02-840, Construction Industry Institute (CII), Austin, USA, 2002.
4. AIA Minnesota Understanding Project Delivery for the Design and Construction of Public Buildings. Technical report, A Society of the American Institute of Architect, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2002.
5. J.H. Paek Y.W. Lee Selection of design/build proposal using fuzzy-logic system J Constr Eng Manage, ASCE 118 2 1992 303-317
6. School Facilities Planning Division, California Department of Education. AB 1402 Design-Build Project Guidelines., California, USA, Edition 2002.
7. Peckka P. Innovative project delivery methods for infrastructure an international prospective. Technical report Finnish Road Enterprise-Headquarters, Helsinki, Finland, 2002.
8. C.M. Gordon Choosing appropriate construction contracting method J Constr Eng Manage, ASCE 120 1 1994 196-210
9. Texas Water Development Board. Alternative Project Delivery methods. Technical report. R.W. Beck Inc., Texas, USA, 2002.
10. PB Network. Alternative Project Delivery system. Technical report, Issue No. 46, Vol. XV(1), Howard Press, Roselle, USA, 2000.
11. T.L. Saaty Multi-criteria decision-making: The analytic hierarchy process 1988 University of Pittsburgh Press Pittsburgh, PA
12. Forman, Ernest, H., Saaty, T., Selly, Mary, A., Waldron, R. Expert Choice 1982-2000. McLean, VA, Decision Support Software Inc., Pittsburgh, USA, 2000.
13. S.H. Chang C.W. Ibbs K. Crandall Network resource allocation with support of a fuzzy expert system J Constr Eng Manage, ASCE 116 2 1992 239-260