Analysing project cost overruns: Comparing the "measured mile"; analysis and system dynamics modelling

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 135-139

  Eden, Colin ^a   Williams, Terry ^a   Ackermann, Fran ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

ADDITIONAL COSTS; COST OVERRUNS; FORENSIC ANALYSIS; SYSTEM DYNAMICS;

FAILURE ANALYSIS;

MODELING; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 12444315100     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. F. Ackermann C. Eden T. Williams Modeling for litigation: Mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches Interfaces 27 1997 48-65
2. R.J. Chapman The role of system dynamics in understanding the impact of changes to key project personnel on design production within construction projects Int J Project Manage 16 1998 235-247
3. K.G. Cooper Naval ship production: A claim settled and a framework built Interfaces 10 1980 20-36
4. Cooper, KG. 1993. "The Rework Cycle," a series of 3 articles "Why Projects Are Mismanaged" and "How It Really Works ... And Reworks ...," PM Network Magazine, February, and "Benchmarks for the Project Manager," Project Manage J, March
5. K.G. Cooper J.M. Lyneis B.J. Bryant Learning to learn, from past to future Int J Project Manage 20 2002 213-219
6. R.F. Cushman C.M. Jacobsen P.J. Trimble (Eds.). Proving and pricing construction claims 1996 Aspen Law and Business Frederick, MD
7. C. Eden T. Williams F. Ackermann S. Howick On the nature of disruption and delay J Oper Res Soc 51 2000 291-300
8. S.B. Graves Why costs increase when projects accelerate Res Technol Manage March-April 1989 16-18
9. S. Howick C. Eden The impact of disruption and delay when compressing large projects: Going for incentives? J Oper Res Soc 52 2001 26-34
10. Patton LH, Gatlin CT. Claims for lost laboUr productivity, Construction lawyer:2000, April
11. I. Richter Pricing construction claims Trans Am Assoc Cost Eng 22 1978 330
12. A. Rodrigues J.A. Bowers System dynamics in project management: A comparative analysis with traditional methods System Dyn Rev 12 1996 121-139
13. Santiago SJ, 2002. Getting the most out of your measured mile. Given on the website www.wickwire.com
14. S. Scott Dealing with delay claims: A survey Int J Project Manage 11 1993 143-154
15. Stephens CA, Graham AK, Lyneis JM. System dynamics modeling in the legal arena: Special challenges of the expert witness role. Presented at the system dynamics conference, 2002
16. T.M. Williams The risk of safety regulation changes in transport development projects Int J Project Manage 18 2000 23-31
17. T.M. Williams Assessing extension of time delays on major projects Int J Project Manage 21 2003 19-26
18. T.M. Williams C. Eden F. Ackermann A. Tait The effects of design changes and delays on project costs J Oper Res Soc 46 1995 809-818
19. T.M. Williams F. Ackermann C. Eden Structuring a disruption and delay claim European J Oper Res 148 2003 192-204