Evaluating teaching personnel. Which model of supervision do Canadian teachers prefer?

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 289-308

  Bouchamma, Yamina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONCTON   (Canada)

Author keywords

Models; Personnel evaluation in education; Professional development; Provinces of Canada; Supervisory methods; Teacher evaluation; Teacher supervision; Teachers' supervision in Canada

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847780655     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-007-9025-8     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alberta Ministry of Learning (1998). Teacher Growth, Supervision, and Evaluation. Politique [Online], 2.1.5, 26. Available: http://www.ucalgary. ca; http://www.education.gov.ab.ca/educationguide/pol-plan/polregs/215.
2. Ali, M.A. (2000). Supervision for Teacher Development. Journal of Educational Development 20(3), 177-188
3. Acheson, K.A. & Gall, M.D. (1993). La supervision pédagogique. Méthodes et secrets d'un superviseur clinicien. Montreal, QC: Les éditions Logiques Inc.
4. Bélanger, R. (1988). La supervision pédagogique: une démarche pour réfléchir à son enseignement. Vie Pédagogique 55, 32-34
5. Benedetti, T.A. & Reed, M.K. (1998). Supervising Student Teachers Using Peer Coaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 417 984).
6. Bennett, D.D. (1995). The Role of Content Knowledge in Instructional Supervision. Research report presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Detroit, MI. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 379 277).
7. Bernard, H. (1991). Cinq types de variables susceptibles d'influencer les résultats de l'évaluation de l'enseignement par les étudiants. Revue Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation 14(2), 37-56
8. Bouchamma, Y. (2004). Évaluation du personnel enseignant en Nouvelle-Écosse: quels savoirs, savoirs faire et savoirs être? Atelier de formation donné le 2 décembre 2004, Nouvelle-Écosse.
9. Bouchamma, Y. (2007). Supervisors' Efficacy in New Brunswick. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations. (in press)
10. Bouchamma, Y., Godin, M., Jenkins Godin, C., Lê, T.-H., & Kardouchi, M. (2005). Évaluation du personnel enseignant: Guide d'Accompagnement. Moncton, NB: Éditions de la Francophonie.
11. Brunelle, J., Drouin, D., Godbout, P., & Tousignant, M. (1988). La supervision pédagogique de l'intervention en activité physique. Montreal, QC: Gaëtan Morin.
12. Brunelle, J., Coulibaly, A., Martel, D., & Spallanzani, C. (1991). La supervision pédagogique. Revue EPS 227, 58-64
13. Caruso, J.J., Beck, C., & Graham, C. (1993). Keeping Professional Company: Individual, Group and Collaborative Supervision in a Student Teaching Practicum. A preliminary Study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 365 624).
14. Chow, A.P.Y., Wong, E.K.P., Yeung, A.S., & Mo, K.W. (2002). Teachers' Perceptions of Appraiser-appraise Relationships. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 16(2), 85-101
15. Clarke, A. & Collins, J.B. (2004). Glickman's Supervisory Belief Inventory: A Cautionary Note. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 20(1), 76-87
16. Cogan, M. (1973). Clinical Supervision. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Collins, A.B. (2004). Teacher Performance Evaluation: A Stressful Experience from a Private Secondary School. Educational Research 46(1), 43-54
18. Copeland, W.D. (1980). Affective Dispositions of Teachers in Training Toward Example of Supervisory Behaviour. Journal of Educational Research 74(1), 37-42
19. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20. Danielson, C. & McGreal, T.L. (2000). Teacher Evaluation to Enhance Professional Practice. Alexandria. VA, US: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
21. Davis, D.R., Ellett, C.D., & Annunziata, J. (2002). Teacher Evaluation, Leadership and Learning Organizations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 16(4), 287-301
22. Ebmeier, H. (2003). How Supervision Influences Teacher Efficacy and Commitment: An Investigation of a Path Model. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 18(2), 110-142
23. Ellett, C. & Teddlie, C. (2003). Teacher Evaluation, Teacher Effectiveness and School Effectiveness: Perspectives from the USA. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 17, 101-128
24. Evans, D.L. (1992). The Instructional Leader Must Go. Reports - evaluative/feasibility, California. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 649).
25. Fenwick, T.J. (2001a). Promouvoir l'apprentissage continu au moyen de plans de croissance professionnelle: Une recommandation prudente en matière de politiques. Communication présenté dans le colloque du Programme pancanadien de recherche en éducation, la formation du personnel enseignant, des éducatrices et éducateurs, tendances actuelles et orientations futures, Quebec, QC.
26. Fenwick, T.J. (2001b). Teacher Supervision Through Professional Growth Plans: Balancing Contradictions and Opening Possibilities. Educational Administration Quarterly 37(3), 401-424
27. Fenwick, T.J. (2004). Teacher Learning and Professional Growth Plans: Implementation of a Provincial Policy. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 19(3), 259-282
28. Freidus, H. (1994). Supervision of Second Career Teachers: What's Our Line? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 375 122).
29. Garman, N.B. (1986). Reflection, the Heart of Clinical Supervision: A Modern Rationale for Professional Practice. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 2(1), 1-24
30. Girard, L., McLean, E., & Morissette, D. (1992). Supervision pédagogique et réussite scolaire. Bourcherville, QC: Gaëtan Morin Éditeur.
31. Glatthorn, A.A. (1984). Differentiated Supervision. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
32. Glickman, C.D. (1981). Developmental Supervision: Alternative Practices for Helping Teachers Improve Instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
33. Goldhammer, R. (1969). Clinical Supervision: Special Methods for the Supervision of Teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
34. Goldstein, J. (2003). Making Sense of Distributed Leadership: The Case of Peer Assistance and Review. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 25(4), 397-421
35. Goldstein, J. (2004). Making Sense of Distributed Leadership: The Case of Peer Assistance and Review. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 26(2), 173-197
36. Good, J.M. & Weaver, A. (2003). Evaluation of Preservice Teachers' Internships: A Model to Encourage Career Continuity and Program Reform. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 17(3), 263-275
37. Guthrie, J.W. & Reed, R.J. (1991). Educational Administration and Policy Effective Leadership for American Education (2nd ed.). Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
38. Haughey, M. & MacElwain, L. (1992). Principals as Instructional Supervisors. Alberta Journal of Educational Research 38(2), 105-119
39. Holland, P.E. & Garman, N. (2001). Toward a Resolution of the Crisis of Legitimacy in the Field of Supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 16(4), 95-111
40. Holtzapple, E. (2003). Criterion-related Validity Evidence for a Standards-based Teacher Evaluation System. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 17(3), 207-219
41. Lavoie, L., Marquis, D., & Laurin, P. (1996). La recherche-action, théorie et pratique. Sainte-Foy, QC: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
42. Milanowski, A.T. & Heneman, H.G. (2001). Assessment of Teacher Reactions to a Standards-based Teacher Evaluation System: A Pilot Study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 15(3), 193-212
43. Nelson, S. & Sassi, A. (2000). Shifting Approaches to Supervision: The Case of Mathematics Supervision. Educational Administration Quarterly 36(4), 553-584
44. New Brunswick Department of Education (1999). Programme d'évaluation du personnel enseignant, direction de la mesure et de l'évaluation. Available at: http://www.gnb.ca/0000/progs/evalf/99327. pdf.
45. Nicklaus, J. & Ebmeier, H. (1999). The Impact of Peer and Principal Collaborative Supervision on Teachers' Trust, Commitment, Desire for Collaboration, and Efficacy. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 14(4), 351-378
46. Nolan, J. & Hoover, L. (2005). Teacher Supervision and Evaluation: Theory into Practice. New York: Wiley.
47. Ovando, M.N. (2001). Teachers' Perceptions of a Learner-centered Teacher Evaluation System. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 15(3), 213-231
48. Pajak, E. (2001). Clinical Supervision and Psychological Functions: A New Direction for Theory and Practice. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 17(3), 189-205
49. Peterson, K.D. (2000). Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
50. Ralph, E.G. (1993). Sensitive, Sensible Practicum Supervision: A Contextual Application in Saskatchewan. Alberta Journal of Educational Research 39(3), 283-296
51. Ralph, E.G. (2002). Mentoring Beginning Teachers: Findings from Contextual Supervision. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 16(3), 191-210
52. Santa, R.E. (2001). Peer Coaching in Group Supervision: Formative (on-going, developmental) Evaluation and Summative (end of the year) Evaluation: Counselor Growth Portfolio. Counseling and Student Services, New York, US. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 456 384).
53. Schön, D.A. (1994). Le praticien réflexif: à la recherche du savoir caché dans l'agir professionnel. Translated and adapted by J. Heynemand & D. Gagnon. Montréal, QC: Les Éditions Logiques.
54. Shinkfield, A.J. (1994). Principal and Peer Evaluation of Teachers for Professional Development. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 8(3), 251-266
55. Silva, D.Y. & Dana, N.F. (2001). Collaborative Supervision in the Professional Development School. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 16(4), 305-321
56. Stronge, J. (1997). Evaluating Teaching: A Guide to Current Thinking and Best Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
57. Sweeney, J. (1992). The Effects of Evaluator Training on Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 6(1), 7-14
58. Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S., & Burdett, J. (2003). International Comparisons of the Relationships Among Educational Effectiveness, Evaluation and Improvement Variables: An Overview. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 17(1), 5-20
59. Telem, M. (1998). School Administration Computerization Impact on the Teacher's Role: A Case Study. Urban Education 33(4), 534-555
60. Waite, D. (1992). Instructional Supervision from a Situational Perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education 8(4), 319-332
61. Walker, A. & Dimmock, C. (2000). Mapping the Way Ahead: Leading Educational Leadership into the Globalised World. School Leadership & Management 20(2), 227-233
62. White, B.L. & Daniel, L.G. (1996). Views of Instructional Supervision: What Do the Textbooks Say? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Tuscaloosa, AL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 403 641).
63. Wilkerson, D.J., Manatt, R.P., Rogers, M.A., & Maughan, R. (2000). Validation of Student, Principal, and Self-ratings in 360° Feedback for Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 14 (2), 179-192