Validation of student, principal, and self-ratings in 360° feedback® for teacher evaluation

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 179-192

  Wilkerson, David J ^a   Manatt, Richard P ^b   Rogers, Mary Ann ^c   Maughan, Ron ^d  

^a Waukee Community Schools   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Lincoln County School District No 1   (United States)

^d Round Valley Unified School District   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141673056     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008158904681     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Adey, P.S. (1995). The effects of a staff development program: The relationship between the level of use of innovative science curriculum activities and student achievement. London, England: King's College London Center for Educational Studies. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 383 567).
2. Cashin, W.E. (1988). Student ratings of teaching: A summary of the research. IDEA Paper No. 20. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Division of Continuing Education.
3. Cashin, W.E. (1995). Student ratings of teaching: The research revisited. IDEA Paper No. 32. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Division of Continuing Education.
4. Emans, R.L., & Millbum, M.C. (1989). The knowledge base of teaching: A review and commentary of process-product research. St. Paul, MN: Bush Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 309 137).
5. Gage, N.L., & Needels, M.C. (1989). Process-product research on teaching: A review of criticisms. The Elementary School Journal, 59(3), 253-300.
6. Gage, N.L. (1994). The scientific status of research on teaching. Educational Theory, 44(4), 371-383.
7. Garrison, J.W., & Macmillan, C.J.B. (1994). "Process-product research on teaching: Ten years later". Educational Theory, 44(4), 385-397.
8. Gastel, B. (1991). "A menu of approaches for evaluating your teaching". BioScience, 41(5), 342-345.
9. Good, T.L., & Mulryan, C. (1990). Teacher ratings: A call for teacher control and self-evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 191-215). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Harris, B.M. (1987). Resolving old dilemmas in diagnostic evaluation. Educational Leadership, 44(7), 46-49.
11. Manatt, R.P. (1988). Teacher performance evaluation: A total systems approach. In Sarah J. Stanley & W. James Popham (Eds.), Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
12. McConney, A. (1998). Introduction: the issue in perspective. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(3), 239-241.
13. McLaughlin, M.W. (1990). Embracing contraries: Implementing and sustaining teacher evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Harnmond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. -403-415). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Omotani, L.M. (1992). Refining valid, reliable, and discriminating student feedback items for use as one component of a total teacher performance evaluation system. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
15. Quality counts 2000, executive summary. (2000). Education Week, 19(18) January 13, 8, 9.
16. Smith, L. (1993). The executive's new coach. Fortune, 128(16), 126-134.
17. Weber, B.J. (1992). Reliability and discrimination power of performance criteria for students' ratings of teachers: A comparison of K-5 and 6-12. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
18. Wilcox, J.M.B. (1995). A comparison of teachers', students' and administrators' perceptions of teaching performance quality in selected K-12 schools. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
19. Wilkerson, D.J. (1997). The association of performance ratings of teachers and achievement of students in the classroom. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.