Relationship between physical properties and sensory attributes of carbonated beverages

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2007, Pages S001-S011

  Kappes, S M ^a   Schmidt, S J ^a   Lee, S Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbonated beverages; Mouthfeel; Physical properties; Sensory attributes

Indexed keywords

SWEETENING AGENT;

ARTICLE; CARBONATED BEVERAGE; CONSUMER; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD HANDLING; HUMAN; PH; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; STANDARD; TASTE; VISCOSITY;

CARBONATED BEVERAGES; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 33846983879     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00205.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arabie P, Moskowitz HR. 1971. The effects of viscosity upon perceived sweetness. Percept Psychophys 9:410-2.
2. Arazi S, Kilcast D, Marrs WM. 2001a. Hydrocolloid/sweetener systems: a multiple-ingredient approach to improving the mouthfeel of low-calorie drinks. Leatherhead Res Rep 774:1-30.
3. Arazi S, Kilcast D, Marrs WM. 2001b. Improving the mouthfeel of low-calorie drinks. Leatherhead Food RA Food Ind J 4:127-34.
4. Ashurst PR. 1998. The chemistry and technology of soft drinks and fruit juices. Boca Raton, Fla.: Sheffield Academic Press. p 258.
5. Askar A, Saddik F. 1996. Applications with sweeteners. Fruit Process 6:394-6.
6. ASTM Committee. 2001. Standard test method for determining the carbon dioxide loss of beverage containers. American Society for Testing and Materials 15.10: F1115-95.
7. Beesley PM. 1995. Sugar functionality reviewed. Food Technol Int Eur 87-9.
8. Berto MI, Gratao CA, Vitali AA, Silveira V. 2003. Rheology of sucrose-CMC model solution. J Texture Studies 34:391-400.
9. Buhl S. 1994. Application of pectins in soft drinks and beverages. Fruit Process 4:8-9.
10. Colwill JS, McEwan JA. 1989. The effect of sweetness matching and flavouring on the sensory characteristics and acceptability of cola drinks. Food ingredients Europe: conference proceedings; Sept. 27-29, 1989: Porte de Versailles, Paris, France. p 318-21.
11. DuBois GE. 1993. Challenges in the reproduction of sucrose taste with high-potency sweeteners. In: Yalpani M, editor. Science for the food industry of the 21st century: biotechnology, supercritical fluids, membranes and other advanced technologies for low calorie, healthy food alternatives. Mount Prospect, Ill.: ALT Press, Scientific Publishers Inc. p 25-36.
12. Fry JC. 1995. Sugar replacement in non-diet soft drinks. Food Technol Int Eur 83-86.
13. Giese JH. 1992. Hitting the spot: beverages and beverage technology. Food Technol 46:70-2.
14. Green BG. 1992. The effects of temperature and concentration on the perceived in tensity and quality of carbonation. Chem Senses 17:435-50.
15. Green BG. 1996. Chemesthesis: pungency as a component of flavor. Trends Food Sci Technol 7:415-20.
16. Greenspan L. 1977. Humidity fixed points of binary saturated aqueous solutions. J Res Natl Bur Stand - A. Phys Chem 81A(1):89-95.
17. Guinard JX, Souchard A, Picot M, Rogeaux M, Sieffermann JM. 1998. Sensory determinants of the thirst-quenching character of beer. Appetite 31:101-15.
18. Hall RL. 1958. Flavor study approaches at McCormick & Co., Inc. In: Arthur D Little, editor. Flavor research and food acceptance. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corp. p 224-40.
19. Hansson A, Andersson J, Leufven A. 2001. The effect of sugars and pectin on flavour release from a soft drink-related model system. Food Chem 72:363-8.
20. 2 level influence on descriptive ratings. J Food Sci 58:893-8.
21. Hollowood TA, Linforth RST, Taylor AJ. 2002. The effect of viscosity on the perception of flavour. Chem Senses 27:583-91.
22. Kappes SM. 2006. Mouthfeel sensory attributes and physical properties of carbonated beverages. [PhD diss). Urbana, Ill.: Univ. of Illinois.
23. Kappes SM, Schmidt SJ, Lee S.-Y. 2006. Descriptive analysis of cola and lemon/lime carbonated beverages. J Food Sci 71(8):S583-9.
24. Kaushal NK, Lal Kaushal BB, Sharma PC. 2004. Optimization of total soluble solids and carbon dioxide gas pressure for the preparation of carbonated beverages from apple and pear juices. J Food Sci Technol 41:142-9.
25. Langstaff SA, Lewis MJ. 1993. Foam and the perception of beer flavour and mouthfeel. Tech Q Master Brew Assoc Am 30:16-7.
26. Langstaff SA, Guinard JX, Lewis MJ. 1991. Instrumental evaluation of the mouthfeel of beer and correlation with sensory evaluation. J Inst Brew 97:427-33.
27. Lederer CL, Bodyfelt FW, McDaniel MR. 1991. The effect of carbonation level on the sensory properties of flavored milk beverages. J Dairy Sci 74:2100-8.
28. Lynch DM, Bamforth CW. 2002. Measurement and characterization of bubble nucleation in beer. J Food Sci 67:2696-701.
29. Marrs WM, Kilcast D, Fabri D, Arazi S. 2003. Sensory characteristics of polysaccharide thickeners in sugar-free, flavored drinks. Leatherhead Res Rep 881:1-44.
30. McEwan JA, Colwill JS. 1996. The sensory assessment of the thirst-quenching characteristics of drinks. Food Qual Prefer 7:101-11.
31. Meyer S, Riha WE. 2002. Optimizing sweetener blends for low-calorie beverages. Food Technol 56:42-5.
32. Mitchell H. 2002. Alternative sweeteners - finding the correct technical and nutritional balance. Drink Technol Mark 6:8-10.
33. Mitchell H, Auerbach MH, Moppett FK. 2001. Polydextrose. In: Nabors LO, editor. Alternative sweeteners, 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker. p 499-517.
34. Mojet J, Christ Hazelhof E, Heidema J. 2001. Taste perception with age: generic or specific losses in threshold sensitivity to the five basic tastes? Chem Senses 26:845-60.
35. Muir DD, Hunter EA, Williams SAR, Brennan RM. 1998. Sensory profiles of commercial fruit juice drinks: influence of sweetener type. J Sci Food Agric 77:559-65.
36. O'Carroll P. 2001. Sweetener trends. World Food Ingred: J Pract Food Technol Feb-Mar:34-6.
37. Olinger PM. 2000. Sweeteners make the difference. Confect Prod 66:24-6.
38. Ripper A, Homler BE, Miller GA. 1986. Aspartame. In: Nabors LO, Gelardi RC, editors. Alternative sweeteners. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. p 43-70.
39. Robinson KM. 2003. Utilizing the R-index by rating method for threshold testing in model caffeine and soy isoflavone solutions. [MS thesis]. Urbana, Ill.: Univ. of Illinois.
40. Sadler GD, Murphy PA. 1998. pH and titratable acidity. In: Nielsen SS, editor. Food analysis, 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, Md.: Aspen Publications. p 99-118.
41. Scott J. 1988. Sugar its role in soft drinks. Soft Drinks Manage Int. December: 24-6.
42. Shore GR, Weenen H, Hoffmann WJ, Schmedding DJM. 1996. Taste and mouthfeel in low calorie soft drinks. In: Anonymous, editor. The contribution of low- and non-volatile materials to the flavor of foods. Ill.: Other-US. p 119-23.
43. Stone H, Oliver S. 1966. Effect of viscosity on the detection of relative sweetness intensity of sucrose solutions. J Food Sci 31:129-34.
44. Szczesniak AS. 1979. Recent developments in solving consumer-oriented texture problems. Food Technol 33:61-6.
45. TA Instruments. 2000. Advanced rheometric expansion system rheometric fluid spectrometer model III (ARES RFS III) instrument manual. New Castle, Del: TA Instruments.
46. Varnam AH, Sutherland JP. 1994. Beverages: technology, chemistry and microbiology, vol. 2, 1st ed. London: Chapman and Hall. p 464.
47. Yau NJN, McDaniel MR. 1991. The effect of temperature on carbonation perception. Chem Senses 16:337-48.
48. Yau NJN, McDaniel MR, Bodyfelt FW. 1989. Sensory evaluation of sweetened flavored carbonated milk beverages. J Dairy Sci 72:367-77.
49. Zampini M, Spence C. 2005. Modifying the multisensory perception of a carbonated beverage using auditory cues. Food Qual Prefer 16:632-41.
50. Zhao L, Kirkmeyer SV, Tepper BJ. 2003. A paper screening test to assess genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Physiol Behav 78:625-33.