Longevity of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite restoring non-carious cervical lesions in a general dental practice

Australian Dental Journal

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 196-200

  Smales, R J ^a,b   Ng, K K W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Compomer; Non carious cervical lesion; Polyacid modified resin composite; Resin modified glass ionomer

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOMER; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTISTRY; GENERAL PRACTICE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL; TOOTH COLOR; TOOTH DISEASE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 11844276045     PISSN: 00450421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2004.tb00073.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994;22:195-207.
2. Osborne-Smith KL, Burke FJT, Wilson NHF. The aetiology of the non-carious cervical lesion. Int Dent J 1999;49:139-143.
3. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, et al. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:41-47.
4. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The effect of cuspal flexure on a buccal Class V restoration: a finite element study. J Dent 1998;26:361-367.
5. Maneenut C, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical 'abrasion' lesions: one-year results. Quintessence Int 1995;26:739-743.
6. Neo J, Chew CL, Yap A, Sidhu S. Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions. Am J Dent 1996;9:15-18.
7. Abdulla AI, Alhadainy HA. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in Class V abrasion lesions: Two-year results. Quintessence Int 1997;28:255-258.
8. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class V lesions. Dent Mater 1998;14:294-306.
9. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1999;30:607-614 (Erratum: 1999;30:845).
10. Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO, Browning WD, Gregory PN. Two-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Oper Dent 1999;24:9-13.
11. Tyas MJ. Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract). Oper Dent 2000;25:152-154.
12. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials - 3-year results. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5:31-39.
13. Ozgunaltay G, Onen A. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1037-1041.
14. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results. Am J Dent 2001;14:153-156.
15. Brackett WW, Dib A, Brackett MG, Reyes AA, Estrada BE. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:477-481.
16. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Brackett MG. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Oper Dent 2001;26:12-16.
17. Ermis RB. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Quintessence Int 2002;33:542-548.
18. van Dijken JWV. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000;16:285-291.
19. Wilder AD, Boghosian AA, Bayne SC, et al. Effect of powder/liquid ratio on the clinical and laboratory performance of resin-modified glass-ionomers. J Dent 1998;26:369-377.
20. Kanchanavasita W, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. Long-term surface micro-hardness of resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent 1998;26:707-712.
21. de Gee AJ, van Duinen RN, Werner A, Davidson CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1996;75:1613-1619.
22. Kunzelmann KH. Glass-ionomer cements, cermet cements, "hybrid"-glass-ionomers and compomers - laboratory trials - wear resistance. Trans Acad Dent Mater 1996;9:89-104.
23. Yip HK, Lam WTC, Smales RJ. Fluoride release, weight loss and erosive wear of modern aesthetic restoratives. Br Dent J 1999;187:265-270.
24. Yip KHK, Peng D, Smales RJ. Effects of APF gel on the physical structure of compomers and glass ionomer cements. Oper Dent 2001;26:231-238.
25. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Determination of changes on tooth-colored cervical restorations in vivo using a three-dimensional laser scanning device. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:233-238.
26. Blunck U. Improving cervical restorations: a review of materials and techniques. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:33-44.
27. Kemp-Schotte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:658-664.
28. Desai M, Tyas MJ. Adhesion to enamel of light-cured poly-acid dental materials. Aust Dent J 1996;41:393-397.
29. Abate PF, Bertacchini SM, Polack MA, Macchi RL. Adhesion of a compomer to dental structures. Quintessence Int 1997;28:509-512.
30. Hinoura K, Miyazaki M, Onose H. Dentin bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1991;70:1542-1544.
31. Buchalla W, Attin T, Hellwig E. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins. J Clin Dent 1996;7:81-84.
32. Pereira PNR, Yamada T, Inokoshi S, et al. Adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer cements using resin bonding systems. J Dent 1998;26:479-485.
33. Smales RJ, Lee YK, Lo FW, Tse CC, Chung MS. Handling and clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant. Am J Dent 1996;9:203-205.
34. van Dijken JWV. Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in class III cavities. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:215-219.
35. Davis BA, Friedl KH, Powers JM. Color stability of hybrid ionomers after accelerated aging. J Prosthodont 1995;4:111-115.
36. Inokoshi S, Burrow MF, Kataumi M, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Opacity and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 1996;21:73-80.
37. Lim BS, Moon HJ, Baek KW, Hahn SH, Kim CW. Color stability of glass-ionomers and polyacid-modified resin-based composites in various environmental solutions. Am J Dent 2001;14:241-246.
38. Oberlander H, Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Kopp A. Clinical performance of polyacid-modified resin restorations using "softstart- polymerization". Clin Oral Investig 1999;3:55-61.
39. Smales RJ, Webster DA. Restoration deterioration related to later failure. Oper Dent 1993;18:130-137.