Narrowing in on educational resources that do affect student achievement

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 23-42

  Archibald, Sarah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846687197     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327930pje8104_2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Andrews, M., Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2002). Revisiting economies of size in American education: Are we any closer to a consensus? Economics of Education Review, 21, 245-262.
2. Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2003, April). Schools and inequality: A multilevel analysis of Coleman's equality of educational opportunity data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
3. Borman, G. D., & Kimball, S. M. (2005). Teacher quality and educational quality: Do teachers with higher standards-based evaluation ratings close student achievement gaps? Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 3-20.
4. Bryk, A., & Raudenbush, S. (1988). Toward a more appropriate conceptualization of research on school effects: A three-level hierarchical linear model. American Journal of Education, 97, 65-108.
5. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence [Electronic version]. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1).
7. Ferguson, R. (1998). Teachers' perceptions and the Black-White test score gap. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 273-317). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
8. Fermanich, M. (2003). School resources and student achievement: The effect of school-level resources on instructional practices and student outcomes in Minneapolis public schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin - Madison.
9. Finn, J., & Achilles, C. (1990). Answers and questions about class size: A statewide experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 557-577.
10. Gallagher, H. A. (2004). Vaughn Elementary's innovative teacher evaluation system: Are teacher evaluation scores related to growth in student achievement? Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 79-107.
11. Gee, J. P. (1999). Critical issues: Reading and the new literacy studies - Reframing the National Academy of Sciences report on reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 31, 355-374.
12. Goldhaber, D. (2002). The mystery of good teaching: Surveying the evidence on student achievement and teachers' characteristics. Education Next, 2, 50-55.
13. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L., & Laine, R. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Education Research, 66, 361-396.
14. Grissmer, D. (Ed.). (1999). Class size: Issues and new findings [Special issue]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2).
15. Hanushek, E. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45-51.
16. Hanushek, E. (1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 84-117.
17. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141-164.
18. Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., O'Brien, D. M., & Rivkin, S. G. (2005). The market for teacher quality (Working Paper No. 11154). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
19. Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (1998). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement (Working Paper No. 6691). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
20. Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5-14.
21. Hoxby, C. (2000). Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variables (Working Paper No. 7867). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
22. Jencks, C. S., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L. E. Lynn & M. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111-186). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
23. Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1998). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
24. Kimball, S. M. (2002). Analysis of the feedback, enabling conditions and fairness perceptions of teachers in three school districts with new standards-based evaluation systems. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16, 241-268.
25. Kimball, S. M., White, B., Milanowski, A. T., & Borman, G. (2004). Examining the relationship between teacher evaluation and student assessment results in Washoe County. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 54-78.
26. Milanowski, A. T. (2004). The relationship between teacher performance evaluation scores and student achievement: Evidence from Cincinnati. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 33-53.
27. Milanowski, A., & Kimball, S. (2005, April). The relationship between teacher expertise and student achievement: A synthesis of three years of data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
28. Milanowski, A. T., Kimball, S. M., & Odden, A. (2005). Teacher accountability measures and links to learning. In L. Stiefel, A. E. Schwartz, R. Rubenstein, & J. Zabel (Eds.), Measuring school performance and efficiency: Implications for practice and research (pp. 137-161). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
29. Murnane, R. (1983). Quantitative studies of effective schools: What have we learned? In A. Odden & L. D. Webb (Eds.), School finance and school improvement: Linkages for the 1980s (pp. 193-209). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
30. Nevada Department of Education. (2004-2005). Glossary of terms: Nevada report card [Web site]. Available from http://www.nevadareportcard.com
31. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
32. Odden, A. R., Borman, G., & Fermanich, M. (2004). Assessing teacher classroom, and school effects, including fiscal effects. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 4-32.
33. Rockoff, J. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94, 247-252.
34. Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104, 1525-1567.
35. Sanders, W. L. (2000). Value-added assessment from student achievement data. Cary, NC: Create National Evaluation Institute.
36. Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J.C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
37. Wayne, A., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73, 89-122.