Qualitative methodology and comparative politics

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 122-144

  Mahoney, James ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Case selection; Causal inference; Theory generation; Theory testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845989910     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: 15523829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414006296345     Document Type: Article

References (153)

1. Abbott, A. (2001). Time matters: On theory and method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Achen, C. H., & Snidal, D. (1989). Rational deterrence theory and comparative case studies. World Politics, 41, 143-169.
3. Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95, 529-546.
4. Amenta, E. (1996). Social politics in context: The institutional politics theory and social spending at the end of the new deal. Social Forces, 75, 33-60.
5. Amsden, A. (2003). The rise of the "rest": Challenges to the West from late-industrializing countries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6. Barton, A. H., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1969). Some functions of qualitative analysis in social research. In G. J. McCall & J. L. Simmons (Eds.), Issues in participant observation (pp. 216-228). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. Bates, R. H. (1981). States and markets in tropical Africa: The political basis of agricultural policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. Bates, R. H., Greif, A., Levi, M., Rosenthal, J., & Weingast, B. (1998). Analytic narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006a). Complex causal relations and case study methods: The example of path dependence. Political Analysis, 14, 250-267.
10. Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006b). Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 455-476.
11. Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2007). Case study methods in the international relations subfield. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 170-195.
12. Berg-Schlosser, D., & DeMeur, G. (1994). Conditions of democracy in interwar Europe: A Boolean test of major hypotheses. Comparative Politics, 26, 253-279.
13. Boone, C. (2003). Political topographies of the African state: Territorial authority and institutional choice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Bowman, K., Lehoucq, F., & Mahoney, J. (2005). Measuring political democracy: Case expertise, data adequacy, and Central America. Comparative Political Studies, 38, 939-970.
15. Brady, H. E. (2004). Doing good and doing better: How far does the quantitative template get us ? In H. E. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (pp. 53-67). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
16. Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (Eds.). (2004). Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
17. Braumoeller, B. F. (2003). Causal complexity and the study of politics. Political Analysis, 11, 209-233.
18. Braumoeller, B. F., & Goertz, G. (2000). The methodology of necessary conditions. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 844-658.
19. Brubaker, R. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Campbell, D. T. (1975). "Degrees of freedom" and the case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8, 178-193.
21. Charrad, M. M. (2001). States and women's rights: The making of postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Clark, W. R., Gilligan, M. J., & Golder, M. (2006). A simple multivariate test for asymmetric hypotheses. Political Analysis, 14, 311-331.
23. Colburn, F. D. (1994). The vogue of revolution in poor countries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Collier, D. (1993). The comparative method. In A. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline II (pp. 105-119). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
25. Collier, D. (1999). Data, field work, and extracting new ideas at close range. APSA-CP: Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association, 10, 1-6.
26. Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49, 430-451.
27. Collier, D., & Mahon, J. E. (1993). Conceptual "stretching" revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 87, 845-855.
28. Collier, D., & Mahoney, J. (1996). Insights and pitfalls: selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics, 49, 56-91.
29. Collier, D., Mahoney, J., & Seawright, J. (2004). Claiming too much: Warnings about selection bias. In H. E. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (pp. 85-102). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
30. Collier, R. B. (1999). Paths toward democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Coppedge, M. (1999). Thickening thin concepts and theories: Combining large n and small in comparative politics. Comparative Politics, 31, 465-476.
33. Coppedge, M. (2001, September). Explaining democratic deterioration in Venezuela through nested induction. Paper presented as the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
34. DeFelice, E. G. (1986). Causal inference and comparative methods. Comparative Political Studies, 19, 415-437.
35. Dion, D. (1998). Evidence and inference in the comparative case study. Comparative Politics, 30, 127-146.
36. Downing, B. M. (1992). The military revolution and political change: Origins of democracy and autocracy in early modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37. Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (1989). Hunger and public action. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
38. Eckstein, H. (1975). Case studies and theory in political science. In F. Greenstein & N. W. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science 7 (pp. 79-137). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
39. Ekiert, G., & Hanson, S. E. (2003). Capitalism and democracy in central and eastern Europe: Assessing the legacy of communist rule. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Elman, C. (2005). Explanatory typologies in qualitative studies of international politics. International Organization, 59, 293-326.
41. Elman, C., & Elman, M. F. (Eds.). (2003). Progress in international relations theory: Appraising the field. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Emigh, R. (1997). The power of negative thinking: The use of negative case methodology in the development of sociological theory. Theory and Society, 26, 649-684.
43. Ertman, T. (1997). Birth of the leviathan: Building states and regimes in medieval and early modern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
45. Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Foran, J. (2005). Taking power: On the origins of third world revolutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. Geddes, B. (2003). Paradigms and sand castles: Theory building in comparative politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
48. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. George, A. L., & McKeown, T. J. (1985). Case studies and theories of organizational decision making. Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, 2, 21-58.
50. Gerring, J. (1997). Ideology: A definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 957-994.
51. Gerring, J. (2001). Social science methodology: A criterial framework. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52. Gerring, J. (2003). Putting ordinary language to work: A min-max strategy of concept formation in the social sciences. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15, 201-232.
53. Gerring, J. (2006). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user's guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55. Goertz, G., & Mahoney, J. (2005). Two-level theories and fuzzy-set analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 33, 497-538.
56. Goertz, G., & Starr, H. (Eds.). (2003). Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
57. Goldstone, J. A. (1997). Methodological issues in comparative macrosociology. In Comparative social research (Vol. 16, pp. 107-120). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
58. Goldstone, J. A. (Ed.). (2003). States, parties, and social movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). Current issues in comparative macrosociology: A debate on methodological issues. Comparative Social Research, 16, 1-26.
60. Goodwin, J. (2001). No other way out: States and revolutionary movements, 1945-1991. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61. Griffin, L. J., Botsko, C., Wahl, A., & Isaac, L. (1991). Theoretical generality, case particularity: Qualitative comparative analysis of union growth and decline. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 32, 110-136.
62. Haas, E. B. (1997). Nationalism, liberalism, and progress: The rise and decline of nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
63. Hacker, J. (2002). The divided welfare state: The battle of public and private benefits in the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64. Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (1992). The politics of economic adjustment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65. Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (1995). The political economy of democratic transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66. Hall, P. A. (2003). Alligning ontology and methodology in comparative politics. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 373-406). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
68. Hicks, A. (1999). Social democracy and welfare capitalism: A century of income security politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
69. Hicks A. M., Misra, J., & Nah Ng, T. (1995). The programmatic emergence of the social security state. American Sociological Review, 60, 329-350.
70. Hirschman, A. (1973). Journeys toward progress: Studies of economic policy making in Latin America. New York: Norton.
71. Huber, E., Ragin, C. C., & Stephens, J. D. (1993). Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 711-749.
72. Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and politics in global markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73. Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
74. Immergut, E. M. (1992). Health politics: Interests and institutions in Western Europe. ambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75. Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
76. Johnson, C. (1987). Political institutions and economic performance: The government-business relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. In F. Deyo (Ed.), The political economy of the new Asian industrialism (pp. 136-164). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
77. Kalyvas, S. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. New York: Cambridge University Press.
78. King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79. Kitschelt, H. (1994). The transformation of European social democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
80. Kitschelt, H., Mansfeldova, Z., Markowski, R., & Tòka, G. (1999). Post-communist party systems: Competition, representation, and inter-party cooperation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81. Kohli, A. (2004). State-directed development: Political power and industrialization in the global periphery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82. Kotowski, C. (1984). Revolution. In G. Sartori (Ed.), Social science concepts: A systematic analysis (pp. 403-451). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
83. Kurtz, M. (2000). Understanding peasant revolution: From concept to theory and case. Theory and Society, 29, 93-124.
84. Laitin, D. (1999). National revivals and violence. In J. R. Bowen & R. Peterson (Eds.), Critical comparisons in politics and culture (pp. 21-60). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
85. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86. Levitsky, S. (1998). Peronism and institutionalization: The case, the concept, and the case for unpacking the concept. Party Politics, 4, 77-92.
87. Lichbach, M. I., & Zuckerman, A. S. (Eds.). (1997). Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
88. Lieberman, E. S. (2003). Race and regionalism in the politics of taxation in Brazil and South Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
89. Lieberman, E. S. (2005). Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review, 99, 435-452.
90. Lieberson, S. (1991). Small n's and big conclusions: An examination of the reasoning in comparative studies based on a small number of cases. Social Forces, 70, 307-320.
91. Lijphart, A. (1968). The politics of accommodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.
92. Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review, 65, 682-693.
93. Linz, J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
94. Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (Eds.). (1968). Party system alignments: Cross-national perspectives. New York: Free Press.
95. Lipset, S. M., Trow, M., & Coleman, J. (1956). Union democracy: The inside politics of the international typographical union. New York: Free Press.
96. Luebbert, G. M. (1991). Liberalism, fascism, or social democracy: Social classes and the political origins of regimes in interwar Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
97. Lustick, I. S. (1993). Unsettled states, disputed lands. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
98. Mahoney, J. (1999). Nominal, ordinal, and narrative appraisal in macrocausal analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1154-1196
99. Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29, 507-548.
100. Mahoney, J. (2003). Long-run development and the legacy of colonialism in Spanish America. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 50-106.
101. Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2004). The possibility principle: Choosing negative cases in comparative research. American Political Science Review, 98, 653-669.
102. Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14, 227-249.
103. Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
104. Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. (Ed.). (1995). Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
105. Marx, A. W. (1998). Making race and nation: A comparison of South Africa, the United States, and Brazil. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
106. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
107. McKeown, T. J. (1999). Case studies and the statistical worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba's Designing social inquiry. International Organization, 53, 161-190.
108. Michels, R. (1999). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New Brunswick: Transaction. (Original work published 1911)
109. Moore, B. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston: Beacon.
110. Munck, G. L. (1998). Canons of research design in qualitative analysis. Studies in Comparative International Development, 33, 18-45.
111. Munck, G. L. (2001). Game theory and comparative politics: New perspectives and old concerns. World Politics, 53, 173-204.
112. Munck, G. L., & Snyder, R. (Eds.). (2007). Passion, craft, and method in comparative politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
113. Nelson, J. M. (Ed.). (1990). The politics of adjustment in the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
114. O'Donnell, G. (1973). Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: Studies in South American politics. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies.
115. O'Donnell, G. (1979). Tensions in the bureaucratic-authoritarian state and the question of democracy. In D. Collier (Ed.), The new authoritarianism in Latin America (pp. 285-318). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
116. O'Donnell, G. (1994). The state, democratization, and some conceptual problems (a Latin American view with glances at some post-communist countries). In W. C. Smith, C. H. Acuña, & E. A. Gamarra (Eds.), Latin American political economy in the age of neoliberal reform (pp. 157-179). New Brunswick: Transaction.
117. Orloff, A. S. (1993). The politics of pensions: A comparative analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880-1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press
118. Parsa, M. (2000). States, ideologies, and social revolutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
119. Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state: Reagan, Thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
120. Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
121. Posner, D. N. (2005). Institutions and ethnic politics in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
122. Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: John Wiley.
123. Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
124. Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
125. Ragin, C. C., Berg-Schlosser, D., & de Meur, G. (1996). Political methodology: Qualitative methods. In R. E. Goodin & H. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook of political science (pp. 749-768). New York: Oxford University Press.
126. Ragin, C. C., & Drass, K. A. (1999). Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 0.963. Tucson: University of Arizona, Department of Sociology.
127. Reno, W. (1998). Warlord politics and African states. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
128. Rueschemeyer, D. (2003). Can one or a few cases yield theoretical gains ? In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 305-336). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
129. Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H., & Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
130. Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64, 1033-1053.
131. Sartori, G. (Ed.). (1984). Social science concepts: A systematic analysis. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
132. Schmitter, P., & Karl, T. (1991). What democracy is...,& is not. Journal of Democracy, 2, 75-83.
133. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
134. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1-29.
135. Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
136. Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
137. Skocpol, T., & Somers, M. (1980). The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22, 174-197.
138. Swank, D. (2002). Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
139. Tarrow, S. G. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective actions, and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
140. Thelen, K. (2003). How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 305-336). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
141. Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
142. Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, capital, and the European states, 990-1990 A.D. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
143. Varshney, A. (2002). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
144. Vogel, S. K. (1996). Freer markets, more rules: Regulatory reform in advanced industrial countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
145. Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
146. Waldner, D. (1999). State-building and late development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
147. Waldner, D. (in press). Inferences and explanations at the k/t boundary...,& beyond. In N. Lebow & M. Lichback (Eds.), Social inquiry and political knowledge. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
148. Waterbury, J. (1993). Exposed to innumerable delusions: Public enterprise and state power in Egypt, India, Mexico, and Turkey. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
149. Weyland, K. (2002). The politics of market reform in fragile democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
150. Wickham-Crowley, T. (1991). A qualitative comparative approach to Latin American revolutions. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 32, 82-109.
151. Wickham-Crowley, T. (1992). Guerrillas and revolution in Latin America: A comparative study of insurgents and regimes since 1956. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
152. Wilkinson, S. I. (2004). Votes and violence: Electoral competition and ethnic riots in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.
153. Yashar, D. J. (2005). Contesting citizenship in Latin America: The rise of indigenous movements and the postliberal challenge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.