A simple multivariate test for asymmetric hypotheses

Political Analysis

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 311-331

  Clark, William Roberts ^a   Gilligan, Michael J ^b   Golder, Matt ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745394617     PISSN: 10471987     EISSN: 14764989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpj018     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Afonso Da Silva, Virgílio. 2006. Duverger's Laws: Between social and institutional determinism. European Journal of Political Research 45:31-41.
2. Amorim Neto, Octavio, and Gary Cox. 1997. Electoral institutions: Cleavage structures and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science 41:149-74.
3. Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder. 2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14:63-82.
4. Braumoeller, Bear. 2003. Causal complexity and the study of politics. Political Analysis 11:209-33.
5. Braumoeller, Bear. 2004. Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms. International Organization 58:807-20.
6. Braumoeller, Bear F., and Gary Goertz. 2000. The methodology of necessary conditions. American Journal of Political Science 44:844-58.
7. Clark, William Roberts, and Matt Golder. 2006. Rehabilitating Duverger's theory: Testing the mechanical and strategic modifying effects of electoral laws. Comparative Political Studies 39.
8. Collier, David, James Mahoney, and Jason Seawright. 2004. Claiming too much: Warnings about selection bias. In Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards, eds. Henry E. Brady and David Collier, 85-102. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
9. Dion, Douglas. 1998. Evidence and inference in the comparative case study. Comparative Politics 30:127-45.
10. Duverger, Maurice. [1954] 1963. Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
11. George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Goertz, Gary. 2001. Necessary condition theory: What Kingdon, Ostrom, and Skocpol have in common. AZ: Department of Political Science, University of Arizona.
13. Goertz, Gary. 2002. The substantive importance of necessary condition hypotheses. In Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications, ed. Gary Goertz and Harvey Starr. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
14. Gordon, Sandford C., and Alastair Smith. 2004. Quantitative leverage through qualitative knowledge: Augmenting the statistical analysis of complex causes. Political Analysis 12:233-55.
15. Hildebrand, David K., James D. Laing, and Howard Rosenthal. 1977. Analysis of ordinal data: Quantiative applications in the social sciences. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Kam, Cindy D., and Robert J. Franzese, Jr. Forthcoming. Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis: A brief refresher and some practical advice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Lakatos, Imre. 1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, ed. Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 91-195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Lieberson, Stanley. 1987. Making it count: The improvement of social research and theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
20. Lieberson, Stanley. 1991. Small N's and big conclusions: An examination of the reasoning in comparative studies based on a small number of cases. Social Forces 70:307-20.
21. Mackie, John L. 1965. Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly 2:245-64.
22. Mahoney, James, and Gary Goertz. 2006. A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis 10.1093/pan/mpj017.
23. Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. Presidentialism, multipartism, and democracy: The difficult combination. Comparative Political Studies 26:198-228.
24. Mill, John Stuart. 1986 [1874]. A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. 8th ed. New York: Harper and Brothers.
25. Popper, Karl. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
26. Przeworski, Adam. 2006. Forthcoming. Is the science of comparative politics possible? In Oxford handbook of comparative politics, ed. Carles Boix and Susan Stokes. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Przeworski, Adam, Michael E. Alvarez, José Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. 2000. Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.
28. Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29. Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30. Ragin, Charles C. 2006. Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis 10.1093/pan/mpj019.
31. Riker, William H. 1982. The two-party system and Duverger's Law: An essay on the history of political science. American Political Science Review 76:753-66.
32. Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2002. Observational studies. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
33. Rubin, Donald. 1974. Estimating the causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Education Psychology 66:688-701.
34. Seawright, Jason. 2005. Qualitative comparative analysis vis-á-vis regression. Studies in Comparative International Development 40:3-26.
35. Stasavage, David. 2002. Private investment and political institutions. Economics and Politics 14:41-63.
36. Tsebelis, George. 2003. Veto players and law production in parliamentary democracies: An empirical analysis. In Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications, ed. Gary Goertz and Harvey Starr, 249-76. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.