DNA damage checkpoints are involved in postreplication repair

Genetics

Volumn 174, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1789-1800

  Barbour, Leslie ^a,b   Ball, Lindsay G ^a   Zhang, Ke ^a   Xiao, Wei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CONJUGATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENE; GENE DELETION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC EPISTASIS; MMS2 GENE; MUTAGENESIS; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAD18 GENE; RAD6 GENE; RAD9 GENE; REV3 GENE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CELL CYCLE; CELL DEATH; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; METHYL METHANESULFONATE; MUTAGENESIS; MUTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYMES;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33845735505     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.056283     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. ABOUSSEKHRA, A., R. CHANET, Z. ZGAGA, C. CASSIER-CHAUVAT, M. HEUDE et al., 1989 RADH, a gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding a putative DNA helicase involved in DNA repair. Characteristics of radH mutants and sequence of the gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 17: 7211-7219.
2. ABRAHAM, R. T., 2001 Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev. 15: 2177-2196.
3. BARBOUR, L., and W. XIAO, 2003 Regulation of alternative replication bypass pathways at stalled replication forks and its effects on genome stability: a yeast model. Mutat. Res. 532: 137-155.
4. BARBOUR, L., Y. ZHU and W. XIAO, 2000 Improving synthetic lethal screens by regulating the yeast centromere sequence. Genome 43: 910-917.
5. BARRINGTON, R. A., M. FASULLO and K. L. KNIGHT, 1999 A role for RAD51 in the generation of immunoglobulin gene diversity in rabbits. J. Immunol. 162: 911-919.
6. BROOMFIELD, S., B. L. CHOW and W. XIAO, 1998 MMS2, encoding a ubiquitin-conjugating-enzyme-like protein, is a member of the yeast error-free postreplication repair pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 5678-5683.
7. BROOMFIELD, S., T. HRYCIW and W. XIAO, 2001 DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 486: 167-184.
8. DE LA TORRE RUIZ, M. A., and N. F. LOWNDES, 2000 DUN1 defines one branch downstream of RAD53 for transcription and DNA damage repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 485: 205-206.
9. DE LA TORRE-RUIZ, M. A., C. M. GREEN and N. F. LOWNDES, 1998 RAD9 and RAD24 define two additive, interacting branches of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway in budding yeast normally required for Rad53 modification and activation. EMBO J. 17: 2687-2698.
10. ELLEDGE, S. J., 1996 Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274: 1664-1672.
11. EMILI, A., 1998 MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 2: 183-189.
12. FOIANI, M., A. PELLICIOLI, M. LOPES, C. LUCCA, M. FERRARI et al., 2000 DNA damage checkpoints and DNA replication controls in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 451: 187-196.
13. FRIEDBERG, E. C., 1988 Deoxyribonucleic acid repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 52: 70-102.
14. FRIEDBERG, E., G. WALKER, W. SIEDE, R. D. WOOD, R. A. SCHULTZ et al., 2006 DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, Ed. 2. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
15. HIETER, P., C. MANN, M. SNYDER and R. W. DAVIS, 1985 Mitotic stability of yeast chromosomes: a colony color assay that measures nondisjunction and chromosome loss. Cell 40: 381-392.
16. HOEGE, C., B. PFANDER, G. L. MOLDOVAN, G. PYROWOLAKIS and S. JENTSCH, 2002 RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419: 135-141.
17. HOFMANN, R. M., and C. M. PICKART, 1999 Noncanonical MMS2-encoded ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme functions in assembly of novel polyubiquitin chains for DNA repair. Cell 96: 645-653.
18. ITO, H., Y. FUKUDA, K. MURATA and A. KIMURA, 1983 Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J. Bacteriol. 153: 163-168.
19. JOHNSON, R. E., S. PRAKASH and L. PRAKASH, 1999 Requirement of DNA polymerase activity of yeast Rad30 protein for its biological function. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 15975-15977.
20. JONES, J. S., and L. PRAKASH, 1990 Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae selectable markers in pUC18 polylinkers. Yeast 6: 363-366.
21. KONDO, T., K. MATSUMOTO and K. SUGIMOTO, 1999 Role of a complex containing Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1 in the yeast DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 1136-1143.
22. KONDO, T., T. WAKAYAMA, T. NAIKI, K. MATSUMOTO and K. SUGIMOTO, 2001 Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Science 294: 867-870.
23. KOSHLAND, D., J. C. KENT and L. H. HARTWELL, 1985 Genetic analysis of the mitotic transmission of minichromosomes. Cell 40: 393-403.
24. LAWRENCE, C. W., 1982 Mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv. Genet. 21: 173-254.
25. LAWRENCE, C. W., and R. CHRISTENSEN, 1976 UV mutagenesis in radiation-sensitive strains of yeast. Genetics 82: 207-232.
26. LEMONTT, J. F., 1971 Mutants of yeast defective in mutation by ultraviolet light. Genetics 68: 21-33.
27. LEMONTT, J. F., 1972 Induction of forward mutations in mutationally defective yeast. Mol. Gen. Genet. 119: 27-42.
28. LIBERI, G., I. CHIOLO, A. PELLICIOLI, M. LOPES, P. PLEVANI et al., 2000 Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. EMBO J. 19: 5027-5038.
29. LONGHESE, M. P., M. FOIANI, M. MUZI-FALCONI, G. LUCCHINI and P. PLEVANI, 1998 DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO J. 17: 5525-5528.
30. LOPES, M., C. COTTA-RAMUSINO, A. PELLICIOLI, G. LIBERI, P. PLEVANI et al., 2001 The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412: 557-561.
31. LOWNDES, N. F., and J. R. MURGUIA, 2000 Sensing and responding to DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10: 17-25.
32. MAJKA, J., and P. M. BURGERS, 2003 Yeast Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1: a sliding clamp for the DNA damage checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 2249-2254.
33. MCKEE, R. H., and C. W. LAWRENCE, 1980 Genetic analysis of gamma-ray mutagenesis in yeast. III. Double-mutant strains. Mutat. Res. 70: 37-48.
34. MELO, J. A., J. COHEN and D. P. TOCZYSKI, 2001 Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev. 15: 2809-2821.
35. NAVAS, T. A., Y. SANCHEZ and S. J. ELLEDGE, 1996 RAD9 and DNA polymerase ε form parallel sensory branches for transducing the DNA damage checkpoint signal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 10: 2632-2643.
36. NELSON, J. R., C. W. LAWRENCE and D. C. HINKLE, 1996a Deoxycytidyl transferase activity of yeast REV1 protein. Nature 382: 729-731.
37. NELSON, J. R., C. W. LAWRENCE and D. C. HINKLE, 1996b Thyminethymine dimer bypass by yeast DNA polymerase ζ. Science 272: 1646-1649.
38. PAPOULI, E., S. CHEN, A. A. DAVIES, D. HUTTNER, L. KREJCI et al., 2005 Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol. Cell 19: 123-133.
39. PASTUSHOK, L., and W. XIAO, 2004 DNA postreplication repair modulated by ubiquitination and sumoylation. Adv. Protein Chem. 69: 279-306.
40. PAULOVICH, A. G., C. D. ARMOUR and L. H. HARTWELL, 1998 The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 genes are required for tolerating irreparable, ultraviolet-induced DNA damage. Genetics 150: 75-93.
41. PFANDER, B., G. L. MOLDOVAN, M. SACHER, C. HOEGE and S. JENTSCH, 2005 SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436: 428-433.
42. PRAKASH, L., and S. PRAKASH, 1977 Isolation and characterization of MMS-sensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 86: 33-55.
43. ROCHE, H., R. D. GIETZ and B. A. KUNZ, 1994 Specificity of the yeast rev3Δ antimutator and REV3 dependency of the mutator resulting from a defect (rad1Δ) in nucleotide excision repair. Genetics 137: 637-646.
44. ROTHSTEIN, R. J., 1983 One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 101: 202-211.
45. SABBIONEDA, S., B. K. MINESINGER, M. GIANNATTASIO, P. PLEVANI, M. MUZI-FALCONI et al., 2005 The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp physically interacts with Polζ and is partially required for spontaneous polzeta-dependent mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 38657-38665.
46. SANCHEZ, Y., J. BACHANT, H. WANG, F. HU, D. LIU et al., 1999 Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by Chk1 and Rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286: 1166-1171.
47. SANTOCANALE, C., and J. F. DIFFLEY, 1998 A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 395: 615-618.
48. SANTOCANALE, C., K. SHARMA and J. F. DIFFLEY, 1999 Activation of dormant origins of DNA replication in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 13: 2360-2364.
49. SCHIESTL, R. H., P. REYNOLDS, S. PRAKASH and L. PRAKASH, 1989 Cloning and sequence analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 gene and further evidence that its product is required for cell cycle arrest induced by DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 1882-1896.
50. SCHIESTL, R. H., S. PRAKASH and L. PRAKASH, 1990 The SRS2 suppressor of rad6 mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae acts by channeling DNA lesions into the RAD52 DNA repair pathway. Genetics 124: 817-831.
51. SHERMAN, F., G. R. FINK and J. HICKS, 1983 Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
52. SIEDE, W., 1995 Cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage: lessons from yeast. Mutat. Res. 337: 73-84.
53. SIEDE, W., A. S. FRIEDBERG and E. C. FRIEDBERG, 1993 RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 7985-7989.
54. SIEDE, W., A. S. FRIEDBERG, I. DIANOVA and E. C. FRIEDBERG, 1994 Characterization of G1 checkpoint control in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae following exposure to DNA-damaging agents. Genetics 138: 271-281.
55. STELTER, P., and H. D. ULRICH, 2003 Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425: 188-191.
56. TERCERO, J. A., and J. F. DIFFLEY, 2001 Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412: 553-557.
57. THELEN, M. P., C. VENCLOVAS and K. FIDELIS, 1999 A sliding clamp model for the Rad1 family of cell cycle checkpoint proteins. Cell 96: 769-770.
58. TOH, G. W., and N. F. LOWNDES, 2003 Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 protein in sensing and responding to DNA damage. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31: 242-246.
59. TONG, A. H. Y., and C. BOONE, 2006 Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, pp. 171-191 in Yeast Protocols, Ed. 2, edited by W. XIAO. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
60. TONG, A. H., M. EVANGELISTA, A. B. PARSONS, H. XU, G. D. BADER et al., 2001 Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294: 2364-2368.
61. ULRICH, H. D., and S. JENTSCH, 2000 Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair. EMBO J. 19: 3388-3397.
62. VAZE, M. B., A. PELLICIOLI, S. E. LEE, G. IRA, G. LIBERI et al., 2002 Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol. Cell 10: 373-385.
63. VIALARD, J. E., C. S. GILBERT, C. M. GREEN and N. F. LOWNDES, 1998 The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J. 17: 5679-5688.
64. VON BORSTEL, R. C., 1978 Measuring spontaneous mutation rates in yeast. Methods Cell Biol. 20: 1-24.
65. WAGA, S., and B. STILLMAN, 1998 The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67: 721-751.
66. WEINERT, T. A., and L. H. HARTWELL, 1988 The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241: 317-322.
67. WEINERT, T. A., and L. H. HARTWELL, 1990 Characterization of RAD9 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and evidence that its function acts posttranslationally in cell cycle arrest after DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 6554-6564.
68. WILLIAMSON, M. S., J. C. GAME and S. FOGEL, 1985 Meiotic gene conversion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and characterization of pms1-1 and pms1-2. Genetics 110: 609-646.
69. XIAO, W., B. L. CHOW and L. RATHGEBER, 1996 The repair of DNA methylation damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 30: 461-468.
70. XIAO, W., B. L. CHOW, T. FONTANIE, L. MA, S. BACCHETTI et al., 1999 Genetic interactions between error-prone and error-free postreplication repair pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 435: 1-11.
71. XIAO, W., B. L. CHOW, S. BROOMFIELD and M. HANNA, 2000 The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 group is composed of an error-prone and two error-free postreplication repair pathways. Genetics 155: 1633-1641.
72. ZHANG, H., and C. W. LAWRENCE, 2005 The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 15954-15959.
73. ZHU, Y., and W. XIAO, 1998 Differential regulation of two closely clustered yeast genes, MAG1 and DDI1, by cell-cycle checkpoints. Nucleic Acids Res. 26: 5402-5408.