Exoskeletons for rehabilitation and motor control

Proceedings of the First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006, BioRob 2006

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 601-606

  Ruiz, A F ^b   Forner Cordero, A ^b   Rocon, E ^b   Pons, J L ^a,b  

^a IEEE

^b Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas   (Spain)

Author keywords

Exoskeletons; Motor control; Orthotics; Rehabilitation robotics

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CONSTRAINT THEORY; MECHATRONICS; MICROMANIPULATORS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; ROBOTICS; VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT;

CYCLICAL MOVEMENTS; EXOSKELETONS; MECHANICAL POWER; TELEMANIPULATION;

HUMAN REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT;

EID: 33845587175     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/BIOROB.2006.1639155     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, M. L. Aisen, and B. T. Volpe. Robot aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Transaction On Rehabilitation Engineering, 6(1):75-87, 1998.
2. H. Kazerooni. Human-robot interaction via the transfer of power and information signals. IEEE Transaction On Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 20(2):450-463, 1990.
3. W.S. Harwin, L.O. Leiber, G.P.G Austwick, and C. Dislis. Clinical potential and design of programmable mechanical impendances for orthotic applications. Robotica, 16:523-530, 1998.
4. J.L. Pons, et al. Virtual reality training and emg control of the manus hand prosthesis. Robotica, 23(3):311-317, 2005.
5. J.C. Moreno, F.J. Brunetti, J.L. Pons, J.M. Baydal, and R. Barbera. Rationale for multiple compensation of muscle weakness walking with a wearable robotic orthosis. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2005.
6. M. Bergamasco, et al. An arm exoskeleton system for teleoperation and virtual environments applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994.
7. K. Nagai, et al. Development of an 8 dof robotic orthosis for assisting human upper limb motion. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1998.
8. G. R. Johnson, D. A. Carus, G. Parrini, S. Scattareggia Marchese, and R. Valeggi. The design of a five-degree-of-freedom powered orthosis for the upper limb. In Proceedings of the I MECH E Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2001.
9. K. Kiguchi and T. Fukuda. A 3dof exoskeleton for upper-limb motion assist - consideration of the effect of bi-articular muscles. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004.
10. J. Rosen, M. Brand, M. Fuchs, and M. Arcan. A myosignal-based powered exoskeleton system. IEEE Transaction On Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 31(3):210-222, 2001.
11. N. G. Tsagarakis and D. Caldwell. Development and control of a "soft-actuated" exoskeleton for use in physiotherapy and training. Autonomous Robots, 15:21-33, 2003.
12. M. DiCicco, L. Lucas, and Y. Matsuoka. Comparison of control strategies for an emg controlled orthotic exoskeleton for the hand. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004.
13. G. Pfurtscheller, C. Guger, G. Muller, G. Krausz, and C. Neuper. Brain oscillations control hand orthosis in a tetraplegic. Neuroscience letters, 292:211-214, 2000.
14. E. Rocon, A. F. Ruiz, J. L. Pons, J. M. Belda-Lois, and J. J. Sanchez-Lacuesta. Rehabilitation robotics: A wearable exo-skeleton for tremor assessment and suppression. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2005.
15. T. Nef and R. Riener. Armin design of a novel arm rehabilitation robot. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005.
16. A. Wege and G. Hommel. Development and control of a hand exoskeleton for rehabilitation of hand injuries. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2005.
17. E. Cavallaro, J. Rosen, J. C. Perry, S. Burns, and B. Hannaford. Hill-based model as a myoprocessor for a neural controlled powered exoskeleton arm - parameters optimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2005.
18. G. Pfurtscheller, G. Muller, and G. Korisek. Mental activity hand orthosis control using the eeg: a case study. Rehabilitation, 41(1):48-52, 2002.
19. B. Hannaford, K. Jaax, and G. Klute. Bio-inspired actuation and sensing. Autonomous Robots, 11(3):267-272, 2001.
20. K. Kiguchi, S. Kariya, K. Watanabe, K. Izumi, and T. Fukuda. An exoskeletal robot for human elbow motion support, sensor fusion, adaptation, and control. IEEE Transaction On Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part B: Cybernetics, 31(3):353-361, 2001.
21. D. P. Ferris G. S. Sawicki, K. E. Gordon. Powered lower limb orthoses: Applications in motor adaptation and rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005.
22. J. L. Pons. Emerging Actuator Technologies: A micromechatronic Approach. Editorial John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., 2005.
23. G. K. Klute, J. M. Czerniecki, and B. Hannaford. Mckibben artificial muscles: Pneumatic actuators with biomechanical intelligence. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, 1999.
24. J. A. Blaya and H. Herr. Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait. IEEE Transaction On Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 12(1):24-31, 2004.
25. J. E. Pratt, S. T. Collins, B. T. Krupp, and C. J. Morse. The roboknee: An exoskeleton for enhancing strength and endurance during walking. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004.
26. J. R. Wolpaw, N. Birbaumer, D. J. McFarland, G. Pfurtscheller, and T. M. Vaughan. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113:767-791, 2002.
27. R. T. Lauer, P. H. Peckham, K. L. Kilgore, and W. J. Heetderks. Applications of cortical signals to neuroprosthetic control: a critical review. IEEE Transaction On Rehabilitation Engineering, 8(2):205-208, 2000.
28. S.H. Scott. Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2(89):119-27, 1999.
29. R. Shadmehr. Generalization as a behavioral window to the neural mechanisms of learning internal models. Human Movement Science, 5(23):543-68, 2004.
30. A.J. Bastian. Cerebellar limb ataxia. abnormal control of selfgenerated and external forces. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1(978):6-27, 2002.
31. M.A Smith and R. Shadmehr. Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. Journal of Neurophysiology, 5(93):2809-21, 2005.
32. J. L. Patton and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi. Robot-assisted adaptive training: Custom force fields for teaching movement patterns. IEEE Transaction On Biomedical Engineering, 51(4):636-646, 2004.
33. J. L. Patton and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi. Robot-assisted adaptive training: Custom force fields for teaching movement patterns. IEEE Transaction On Biomedical Engineering, 51(4):636-646, 2004.
34. W. Harwin, et al. The gentles/s project: A new method of delivering neurorehabilitation. In Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe (AAATE), 2001.
35. Neurorobotics project, http://www.neurorobotics.info