Web-based tools for designing and developing teaching materials for integration of information technology into instruction

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 139-149

  Chang, Kuo En ^a   Sung, Yao Ting ^a   Hou, Huei Tse ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Instructional design; Integrated technology into instruction; Web based teaching material design and development

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845290594     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chang, K. E., Chen, S. F. & Sung, T. C. (2001) Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 17 (1), 21-33.
2. Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T. & Chiou, S. K. (2002). Use of hierarchical hyper concept map in Web-based courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27 (4), 333-351.
3. Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T. & Lee, C. L. (2003). Web-based collaborative inquiry learning system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19 (1), 56-69.
4. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H. & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 813-834.
5. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 47-61.
6. Fisher, M. M. (1997). The voice of experience: In-service teacher technology competency recommendations for pre-service teacher preparation programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 5, 139-147.
7. Havista, N. & Lesgold, A. (1996). Situational effects in classroom technology implementations: Unfulfilled expectations and unexpected outcomes. In Kerr, S. T. (Ed.), Technology and the future of schooling: Ninety-fifth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part 2 (131-171). Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
8. International Society for Technology in Education (2000). National Educational Technology Standards for Students: Connecting Curriculum and Technology. O. R. Eugene: Author.
9. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design and instruction. In Reiguluth, C. M. (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (383-434). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Lawson, T. & Comber, C. (1999). Superhighway technology: Personnel factors leading to successful integration of information and communications technology in schools and colleges. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 8, 41-53.
11. Leu, D. J., Hillinger, M., Loseby, P., Balcom, M., Dinkin, J., Eckels, M., Johnson, J., Mathews, K. & Raegler, R. (1998). Grounding the design of new technologies for literacy and learning in teachers' instructional needs. In Reinking, D., McKenna, M., Labbo, L. D. & Kieffer, R. (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (203-220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Linn, M. C. (2000). Designing the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 781-796.
13. Mannaz, M. (1999). An expert teacher's thinking and teaching and instructional design models and principles: An Ethnographic study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46, 37-64.
14. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S. & Soloway. E. (1998). New technologies for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 33-52.
15. Niederhauser, D. S. & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 15-31.
16. Norum, K., Grabinger, R. S. & Duffield, J. A.(1999). Healing the universe is an inside job: Teacher's views on integrating technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7, 187-203.
17. OTA (Office of Technology Assessment). (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
18. Park, O. (1991). Hypermedia: Functional features and powerful ideas. NewYork: Basic Books.
19. Roberts, S. K. & Hsu, Y. S. (2000). The tools of teacher education: Preservice teachers' use of technology to create instructional materials. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 133-152.
20. Rogers, P. A. (2000). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22, 455-472.
21. Scheffler, F. L. & Logan, J. P. (1999). Computer technology in schools: What teachers should know and be able to do. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 305-326.
22. Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). NonparametricSstatistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw Hill.
23. Small, R. V., Sutton, S., Miwa, M., Urfels, C. & Eisenberg, M. (1998). Information seeking for instructional planning: An exploratory study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 204-215.
24. Topper, A. (1998). Co-constructing practices of teaching with technology: Working collaboratively with TE instructors on technology adoption. Technology and Teacher Education Annual 1998, 74-748.
25. Willis, J., Thompson, A., & Sadera, W. (1999). Research on technology and teacher education: Current status and future directions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 29-45.