Use of hierarchical hyper concept map in web-based courses

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 335-353

  Chang, Kuo En ^a   Sung, Yao Ting ^a   Chiou, Sheng Kuang ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038446736     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/MTUR-9BJQ-FE33-QM0A     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alverman, D. E. (1981). The compensatory effect of graphic organizers on descriptive text. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 44-48.
2. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
3. Beyerbach, B. A., & Smith, J. M. (1990). Using computerized concept mapping program to assess teacher's thinking about effective teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 961-971.
4. Briscoe, C., & LaMaster, S. U. (1991). Meaningful learning in college biology through concept mapping. The American Biology Teacher, 53, 214-219.
5. Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, S. F. (2001). Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 1-13.
6. Chen, S. W., Lin, S. C., Chang, K. E. (2001). Attributed concept maps: Fuzzy integration and fuzzy assessment. IEEE Trans. on System, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 31(5), 842-852.
7. Chou, C., & Lin, H. (1998). The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners' performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 151-176.
8. Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20, 17-41.
9. Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. H. (1995). Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 431-468.
10. Edmondson, K. (1995). Concept mapping for the development of medical curricular. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 777-793.
11. Ferry, B., Hedberg, J., & Harper, B. (1997). How do preserve teachers use concept maps to organize their curriculum content knowledge. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9, 83-104.
12. Goldsmith, T. E., Johnson, P. J., & Acton, W. H. (1991). Assessing structural knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 88-96.
13. Hammond, N., & Allison, L. (1989). Extending hypertext for learning: An investigation of access and guidance tools. In A. Sutcliffe & L. Macaulay (Eds.), People and computers V (pp. 293-304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Herl, H., Baker, B., & Niemi, D. (1996). Construct validation of an approach to modeling cognitive structure of U.S. history knowledge. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 213-230.
15. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabinger, R. S. (1990). Problems and issues in designing hypertext/ hypermedia for learning. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 3-25). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
16. Kennedy, D. M., & McNaught, C. (1997). Use of concept mapping in the design of learning tools for interactive multimedia. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8, 389-406.
17. Komers, P., & Lanzing, J. (1997). Students' concept mapping for hypermedia design: Navigation through World Wide Web (WWW) space and self-assessment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8, 421-455.
18. Lai, Y. R., & Waugh, M. L. (1995). Effects of three different hypertextual menu designs on various information searching activities. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 4, 25-52.
19. Lambiotte, J. G., Dansereau, D. F., Cross, D. R., & Reynolds, S. B. (1989). Multirelational semantic maps. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 331-367.
20. Leader, L. F., & Klein, J. D. (1996). The effects of search tool type and cognitive style on performance during hypermedia database searches. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44, 5-15.
21. Liu, M. (1994). Hypermedia assisted instruction and second language learning: A semantic-network-based approach. Computer in the School, 10, 293-313.
22. McAleese, R. (1991). The acquisition and representations of domain specific knowledge using notecards. In R. McAleese (Ed.), Hypermedia courseware structures of communication and intelligent help (pp. 11-18). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
23. Moen, E. M. J. C., & Boersma, K. T. (1997).The significance of concept mapping for education and curriculum development. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8, 487-502.
24. Moore, D. W., & Readence, J. E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 11-17.
25. Nakhleh, M., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students' understanding of acid, base, and PH concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1077-1096.
26. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.
27. Paclucci, R. (1998). The effects of cognitive style and knowledge structure on performance using a hypermedia learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 123-150.
28. Posner, G. J., & Rudnitsky, A. N. (1998). Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers. New York: Longman.
29. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Schavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 569-600.
30. Shapiro, A. M.(1999). The relevance of hierarchies to learning biology from hypertext. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 215-243.
31. Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., & Hay, K. (1994). Learner centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interaction, 1, 36-48.
32. Sung, Y. T., Chen, I. D., & Chang, K. E. (2000). The effect of concept mapping for improving reading comprehension and summarization abilities: A scaffold-fading approach. Paper presented in the 2000 Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, April 24-28, New Orleans.
33. Stanton, N. A., Taylor, R. G., & Tweedie, L. A. (1992). Maps as navigational aids in hypertext environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1, 431-444.
34. Starr, M. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (1990). Concept maps as heuristic for science curriculum development: Toward improvement in process and product. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 987-1000.
35. Stone, C. L. (1983). A meta-analysis of advanced organizer studies. Journal of Experimental Education, 51, 194-199.
36. Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.