Stem cell neural differentiation: a model for chemical biology

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 592-597

  Krencik, Robert ^a   Zhang, Su Chun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMISTRY; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL RENEWAL; CELL SPECIFICITY; COMPLEX FORMATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE CONTROL; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MACROMOLECULE; MODEL; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NERVE REGENERATION; NEURAL STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PROGENY; REVIEW; STEM CELL;

CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NEURONS; STEM CELLS;

EID: 33751501662     PISSN: 13675931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.10.002     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Tropepe V., Hitoshi S., Sirard C., Mak T.W., and Rossant J. van der KD: Direct neural fate specification from embryonic stem cells: a primitive mammalian neural stem cell stage acquired through a default mechanism. Neuron 30 (2001) 65-78
2. Smukler S.R., Runciman S.B., and Xu S. van der KD: Embryonic stem cells assume a primitive neural stem cell fate in the absence of extrinsic influences. J Cell Biol 172 (2006) 79-90
3. Wichterle H., Lieberam I., Porter J.A., and Jessell T.M. Directed differentiation of embryonic stem cells into motor neurons. Cell 110 (2002) 385-397. The differentiation process of spinal motor neurons from mouse ESCs recapitulates some key elements in normal in vivo development. GFP expression under the control of the motor neuron-specific promoter HB9 can also be a readout for chemical screening.
4. Ying Q.L., Stavridis M., Griffiths D., Li M., and Smith A. Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture. Nat Biotechnol 21 (2003) 183-186
5. Watanabe K., Kamiya D., Nishiyama A., Katayama T., Nozaki S., Kawasaki H., Watanabe Y., Mizuseki K., and Sasai Y. Directed differentiation of telencephalic precursors from embryonic stem cells. Nat Neurosci 8 (2005) 288-296
6. Zhang S.C., Wernig M., Duncan I.D., Brustle O., and Thomson J.A. In vitro differentiation of transplantable neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 19 (2001) 1129-1133
7. Li X.J., Du Z.W., Zarnowska E.D., Pankratz M., Hansen L.O., Pearce R.A., and Zhang S.C. Specification of motoneurons from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 23 (2005) 215-221. The first paper to describe a carefully designed, chemically defined system to direct human ESCs to early neuroectoderm, neural progenitors, postmitotic spinal motor neurons, and functional neurons. Such a system provides a well-controlled template for dissecting macromolecular interactions underlying the developmental process with a clear causal-effect relationship.
8. Lee S.H., Lumelsky N., Studer L., Auerbach J.M., and McKay R.D. Efficient generation of midbrain and hindbrain neurons from mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 18 (2000) 675-679
9. Perrier A.L., Tabar V., Barberi T., Rubio M.E., Bruses J., Topf N., Harrison N.L., and Studer L. From the Cover: Derivation of midbrain dopamine neurons from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101 (2004) 12543-12548
10. Yan Y., Yang D., Zarnowska E.D., Du Z., Werbel B., Valliere C., Pearce R.A., Thomson J.A., and Zhang S.C. Directed differentiation of dopaminergic neuronal subtypes from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 23 (2005) 781-790
11. Zhang S.C. Neural subtype specification from embryonic stem cells. Brain Pathol 16 (2006) 132-142
12. Ahn J.I., Lee K.H., Shin D.M., Shim J.W., Lee J.S., Chang S.Y., Lee Y.S., Brownstein M.J., Lee S.H., and Lee Y.S. Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of differentiation of embryonic stem cells into midbrain and hindbrain neurons. Dev Biol 265 (2004) 491-501. Comparison of gene expression profiles of five consecutive stages along differentiation of mouse ESCs to dopaminergic neurons reveals classical and unknown genes and potential signaling pathways that are involved in the developmental process.
13. Brandenberger R., Wei H., Zhang S., Lei S., Murage J., Fisk G.J., Li Y., Xu C., Fang R., Guegler K., et al. Transcriptome characterization elucidates signaling networks that control human ES cell growth and differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 22 (2004) 707-716
14. Richards M., Tan S.P., Tan J.H., Chan W.K., and Bongso A. The transcriptome profile of human embryonic stem cells as defined by SAGE. Stem Cells 22 (2004) 51-64. Serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) was used to compare transcriptome profiles between two ESC lines, adult tissue, and with a mouse ESC SAGE library. This quantitative technique was also useful to identify candidate marker genes for ESCs.
15. Robson P. The maturing of the human embryonic stem cell transcriptome profile. Trends Biotechnol 22 (2004) 609-612
16. Lee M.S., Jun D.H., Hwang C.I., Park S.S., Kang J.J., Park H.S., Kim J., Kim J.H., Seo J.S., and Park W.Y. Selection of neural differentiation-specific genes by comparing profiles of random differentiation. Stem Cells 24 (2006) 1946-1955
17. Luo Y., Schwartz C., Shin S., Zeng X., Chen N., Wang Y., Yu X., and Rao M.S. A focused microarray to assess dopaminergic and glial cell differentiation from fetal tissue or embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 24 (2006) 865-875
18. Ginis I., Luo Y., Miura T., Thies S., Brandenberger R., Gerecht-Nir S., Amit M., Hoke A., Carpenter M.K., Itskovitz-Eldor J., and Rao M.S. Differences between human and mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol 269 (2004) 360-380
19. Ramalho-Santos M., Yoon S., Matsuzaki Y., Mulligan R.C., and Melton D.A. Stemness: transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells. Science 298 (2002) 597-600
20. Boyer L.A., Lee T.I., Cole M.F., Johnstone S.E., Levine S.S., Zucker J.P., Guenther M.G., Kumar R.M., Murray H.L., Jenner R.G., et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 122 (2005) 947-956. This first genome-wide location analysis of the pluripotency transcription factors OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG in human ESCs has revealed DNA occupancy sites of Oct4, Sox2, Nanog and other pluripotent genes by these factors. It has also revealed the occupancy of these transcription factors in many development-related genes, suggesting their repressive roles in differentiation to maintain the stem cell state. This study also illustrates a powerful tool of stem cells to understand complex transcriptional networks.
21. Loh Y.H., Wu Q., Chew J.L., Vega V.B., Zhang W., Chen X., Bourque G., George J., Leong B., Liu J., et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 38 (2006) 431-440
22. Bantignies F., and Cavalli G. Cellular memory and dynamic regulation of Polycomb group proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18 (2006) 275-283
23. Boyer L.A., Plath K., Zeitlinger J., Brambrink T., Medeiros L.A., Lee T.I., Levine S.S., Wernig M., Tajonar A., Ray M.K., et al. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature (2006)
24. Lee T.I., Jenner R.G., Boyer L.A., Guenther M.G., Levine S.S., Kumar R.M., Chevalier B., Johnstone S.E., Cole M.F., Isono K., et al. Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 125 (2006) 301-313. Large-scale analysis of the DNA occupancy sites of chromatin modifying PcG proteins to gene promoters in human ESCs before and after differentiation signifies the importance of PcG proteins in repressing developmental genes and maintaining pluripotency of human ESCs. This study also demonstrates the powerful tool of ESCs in large-scale macromolecular analyses.
25. Wu H., and Sun Y.E. Epigenetic regulation of stem cell differentiation. Pediatr Res 59 (2006) 21R-25R
26. Hsieh J., and Gage F.H. Epigenetic control of neural stem cell fate. Curr Opin Genet Dev 14 (2004) 461-469
27. Ballas N., Grunseich C., Lu D.D., Speh J.C., and Mandel G. REST and its corepressors mediate plasticity of neuronal gene chromatin throughout neurogenesis. Cell 121 (2005) 645-657. Using neural differentiation from mouse ESCs as a model system, the authors have demonstrated a clear inverse relationship between the REST expression level and neural differentiation including gene expression, epigenetic modifications and cellular outcomes.
28. Shimozaki K., Namihira M., Nakashima K., and Taga T. Stage- and site-specific DNA demethylation during neural cell development from embryonic stem cells. J Neurochem 93 (2005) 432-439
29. Fan G., Martinowich K., Chin M.H., He F., Fouse S.D., Hutnick L., Hattori D., Ge W., Shen Y., Wu H., et al. DNA methylation controls the timing of astrogliogenesis through regulation of JAK-STAT signaling. Development 132 (2005) 3345-3356. This detailed study demonstrates the importance of methylation states of DNA in affecting differentiation. For example, the number of astrocytes that can be produced increases due to DNA hypomethylation in mouse neural precursor cells with a deletion in the maintenance DNA methyltransferase 1 gene.
30. Williams R.R., Azuara V., Perry P., Sauer S., Dvorkina M., Jorgensen H., Roix J., McQueen P., Misteli T., Merkenschlager M., and Fisher A.G. Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of the Mash1 locus. J Cell Sci 119 (2006) 132-140
31. Kaji K., Caballero I.M., MacLeod R., Nichols J., Wilson V.A., and Hendrich B. The NuRD component Mbd3 is required for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 8 (2006) 285-292
32. Bernstein B.E., Mikkelsen T.S., Xie X., Kamal M., Huebert D.J., Cuff J., Fry B., Meissner A., Wernig M., Plath K., et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125 (2006) 315-326
33. Rugg-Gunn P.J., Ferguson-Smith A.C., and Pedersen R.A. Epigenetic status of human embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 37 (2005) 585-587
34. Xi R., and Xie T. Stem cell self-renewal controlled by chromatin remodeling factors. Science 310 (2005) 1487-1489
35. Szutorisz H., and Dillon N. The epigenetic basis for embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Bioessays 27 (2005) 1286-1293
36. Moffat J., Grueneberg D.A., Yang X., Kim S.Y., Kloepfer A.M., Hinkle G., Piqani B., Eisenhaure T.M., Luo B., Grenier J.K., et al. A lentiviral RNAi library for human and mouse genes applied to an arrayed viral high-content screen. Cell 124 (2006) 1283-1298. A very useful lentivirus shRNA vector resource (targeting 12 000 human and 10 000 mouse genes).
37. Moffat J., and Sabatini D.M. Building mammalian signalling pathways with RNAi screens. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7 (2006) 177-187
38. Ding S., and Schultz P.G. A role for chemistry in stem cell biology. Nat Biotechnol 22 (2004) 833-840
39. Zaehres H., Lensch M.W., Daheron L., Stewart S.A., Itskovitz-Eldor J., and Daley G.Q. High-efficiency RNA interference in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 23 (2005) 299-305. This is a proof of principle study demonstrating that gene knockdown by siRNA in human ESCs is feasible.
40. Andersson E., Tryggvason U., Deng Q., Friling S., Alekseenko Z., Robert B., Perlmann T., and Ericson J. Identification of intrinsic determinants of midbrain dopamine neurons. Cell 124 (2006) 393-405. The focus of the paper is the demonstration of Lmx1a as critical for specification of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in vivo. It also illustrates the essential markers for defining midbrain dopaminergic neurons that are produced from ESCs.
41. Ding S., Wu T.Y., Brinker A., Peters E.C., Hur W., Gray N.S., and Schultz P.G. Synthetic small molecules that control stem cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 (2003) 7632-7637. A mouse embryonic carcinoma cell line containing a luciferase reporter, driven by the neuron specific promoter Tα1, was used to screen libraries of heterocyclic compounds synthesized from kinase directed molecular scaffolds. Several molecules were found to induce neuronal differentiation based on luciferase activity, morphology and immunocytochemistry. This paper illustrates the usefulness of stem cell differentiation as a platform for chemical screening.
42. Yao S., Chen S., Clark J., Hao E., Beattie G.M., Hayek A., and Ding S. Long-term self-renewal and directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells in chemically defined conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 (2006) 6907-6912
43. Ludwig T.E., Levenstein M.E., Jones J.M., Berggren W.T., Mitchen E.R., Frane J.L., Crandall L.J., Daigh C.A., Conard K.R., Piekarczyk M.S., et al. Derivation of human embryonic stem cells in defined conditions. Nat Biotechnol 24 (2006) 185-187
44. Zhao S., Maxwell S., Jimenez-Beristain A., Vives J., Kuehner E., Zhao J., O'Brien C., de Felipe C., Semina E., and Li M. Generation of embryonic stem cells and transgenic mice expressing green fluorescence protein in midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Eur J Neurosci 19 (2004) 1133-1140