A probabilistic view of gene function

Nature Genetics

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 559-564

  Fraser, Andrew G ^a   Marcotte, Edward M ^b  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; DYNAMICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; NONHUMAN; PLEIOTROPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; GENES, FUNGAL; GENES, HELMINTH; GENOMICS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 2642566695     PISSN: 10614036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ng1370     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29 (2000).
2. Bateman, A. et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res.. 30, 276-280 (2002).
3. Kanehisa, M. et al. The KEGG databases at GenomeNet. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 42-46 (2002).
4. Karp, P.D. etal. The EcoCyc Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 56-58 (2002).
5. Karp, P.D. etal. The MetaCyc Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 59-61 (2002).
6. Mewes, H.W. et al. MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 31-34 (2002).
7. Mulder, N.J. et al. The InterPro Database, 2003 brings increased coverage and new features. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 315-318 (2003).
8. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation. Genome Res. 11, 1425-1433 (2001).
9. Tjian, R. The biochemistry of transcription in eukaryotes: a paradigm for multisubunit regulatory complexes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 351, 491-499 (1996).
10. Brand, M. et al. UV-damaged DNA-binding protein in the TFTC complex links DNA damage recognition to nucleosome acetylation. EMBO J. 20, 3187-3196 (2001).
11. Martinez, E. et al. Human STAGA complex is a chromatin-acetylating transcription coactivator that interacts with pre-mRNA splicing and DNA damage-binding factors in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 6782-6795 (2001).
12. Hall, A. The cellular functions of small GTP-binding proteins. Science 249, 635-640 (1990).
13. Ritzi, M. et al. Human minichromosome maintenance proteins and human origin recognition complex 2 protein on chromatin. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24543-24549 (1998).
14. Rowles, A. et al. Interaction between the origin recognition complex and the replication licensing system in Xenopus. Cell 87, 287-296 (1996).
15. Coleman, T.R., Carpenter, P.B. & Dunphy, W.G. The Xenopus Cdc6 protein is essential for the initiation of a single round of DNA replication in cell-free extracts. Cell 87, 53-63 (1996).
16. Bell, S.P. & Stillman, B. ATP-dependent recognition of eukaryotic origins of DNA replication by a multiprotein complex. Nature 357, 128-134 (1992).
17. Vashee, S. et al. Assembly of the human origin recognition complex. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 26666-26673 (2001).
18. Dhar, S.K., Delmolino, L. & Dutta, A. Architecture of the human origin recognition complex. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 29067-29071 (2001).
19. Raychaudhuri, S. et al. Associating genes with gene ontology codes using a maximum entropy analysis of biomedical literature. Genome Res. 12, 203-214 (2002).
20. Troyanskaya, O.G. et al. A Bayesian framework for combining heterogeneous data sources for gene function prediction (in Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8348-8353 (2003).
21. Clare, A. & King, R.D. Machine learning of functional class from phenotype data. Bioinformatics 18, 160-166 (2002).
22. Von Mering, C. et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417, 399-403 (2002).
23. Jansen, R. et al. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science 302, 449-453 (2003).
24. Schwikowski, B., Uetz, P. & Fields, S. A network of protein-protein interactions in yeast. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 1257-1261 (2000).
25. Deane, C.M. et al. Protein interactions: two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 349-356 (2002).
26. Saito, R., Suzuki, H. & Hayashizaki, Y. Interaction generality, a measurement to assess the reliability of a protein-protein interaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 1163-1168 (2002).
27. Goldberg, D.S. & Roth, F.P. Assessing experimentally derived interactions in a small world. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4372-4376 (2003).
28. Jansen, R. et al. Integration of genomic datasets to predict protein complexes in yeast. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2, 71-81 (2002).
29. Huynen, M. et al. Predicting protein function by genomic context: quantitative evaluation and qualitative inferences. Genome Res. 10, 1204-1210 (2000).
30. von Mering, C. et al. STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 258-261 (2003).
31. Marcotte, E.M. et al. A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature 402, 83-86 (1999).
32. Ito, T. et al. Toward a protein-protein interaction map of the budding yeast: A comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1143-1147 (2000).
33. Ito, T. et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569-4574 (2001).
34. Tong, A.H. et al. A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science 295, 321-324 (2002).
35. Uetz, P. et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-627 (2000).
36. Gavin, A.C. et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141-147 (2002).
37. Ho, Y. et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415, 180-183 (2002).
38. Tong, A.H. et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294, 2364-2368 (2001).
39. Rives, A.W. & Galitski, T. Modular organization of cellular networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1128-1133 (2003).
40. Spirin, V. & Mirny, L.A. Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12123-12128 (2003).
41. Tornow, S. & Mewes, H.W. Functional modules by relating protein interaction networks and gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 6283-6289 (2003).
42. Ideker, T. & Lauffenburger, D. Building with a scaffold: emerging strategies for high- to low-level cellular modeling. Trends Biotechnol. 21, 255-262 (2003).
43. Segal, E. et al. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nat. Genet. 34, 166-176 (2003).
44. Von Mering, C. et al. Genome evolution reveals biochemical networks and functional modules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15428-15433 (2003).
45. Krause, R., von Mering, C. & Bork, P. A comprehensive set of protein complexes in yeast: mining large scale protein-protein interaction screens. Bioinformatics 19, 1901-1908 (2003).
46. Manke, T., Bringas, R. & Vingron, M. Correlating protein-DNA and protein-protein interaction networks. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 75-85 (2003).
47. Stuart, J.M. et al. A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science 302, 249-255 (2003).
48. Date, S.V. & Marcotte, E.M. Discovery of uncharacterized cellular systems by genome-wide analysis of functional linkages. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1055-1062 (2003).
49. Wu, L.F. et al. Large-scale prediction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene function using overlapping transcriptional clusters. Nat. Genet. 31, 255-265 (2002).
50. Snel, B., Bork, P. & Huynen, M.A. The identification of functional modules from the genomic association of genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5890-5895 (2002).
51. Wagner, A. & Fell, D.A. The small world inside large metabolic networks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 268, 1803-1810 (2001).
52. Watts, D.J. & Strogatz, S.H. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 393, 440-442 (1998).
53. Matthews, L.R. et al. Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or "interologs". Genome Res. 11, 2120-2126 (2001).
54. Marcotte, E. & Date, S. Exploiting big biology: integrating large-scale biological data for function inference. Brief. Bioinform. 2, 363-374 (2001).
55. Remm, M., Storm, C.E. & Sonnhammer, E.L. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 314, 1041-1052 (2001).
56. Kamath, R.S. et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature421, 231-237 (2003).
57. Gonczy, P. et al. Functional genomic analysis of cell division in C. elegans using RNAi of genes on chromosome III. Nature 408, 331-336 (2000).
58. Piano, F., Schetter, A.J., Mangone, M., Stein, L. & Kemphues, K.J. RNAi analysis of genes expressed in the ovary of Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 10, 1619-1622 (2000).