Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: Results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial

Stroke

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 2369-2375

  Van Der Lee, Johanna H ^a,b   Wagenaar, Robert C ^a   Lankhorst, Gustaaf J ^a,b   Vogelaar, Tanneke W ^a   Devillé, Walter L ^b   Bouter, Lex M ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arm; Clinical trials; Disability; Hemiplegia; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; IMMOBILIZATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STROKE; TRAINING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032721340     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.30.11.2369     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bots ML, Feskens EJM, Gijsen R, Grobbee DE. Beroerte. In: Maas IAM, Gijsen R, Lobbezoo IE, Poos MJJC, eds. Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning 1997, I: De gezondheidstoestand: een actualisering, Maarssen, Netherlands: Elsevier/De Tijdstroom; 1997:451-462.
2. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy. 1999;13:457-470.
3. Wagenaar RC. Functional Recovery After Stroke [PhD thesis]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: VU University Press; 1990.
4. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke: a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing. 1996;25: 479-489.
5. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347-354.
6. Andrews K, Stewart J. Stroke recovery: he can but does he? Rheumatol Rehabil. 1979;18:43-48.
7. Ostendorf CG, Wolf SL. Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function: a single-case design. Phys Ther. 1981;61:1022-1028.
8. Wolf SL, Lecraw E, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104:125-132.
9. Taub E, Pidikiti RD, DeLuca SC, Crago JE. Effects of motor restriction of an unimpaired upper extremity and training on improving functional tasks and altering brain/behaviors. In: Toole J, ed. Imaging and Neurologic Rehabilitation. New York, NY: Demos Publications; 1996.
10. Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586-592.
11. Davies PM. Steps to Follow: A Guide to the Treatment of Adult Hemiplegia. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag; 1985.
12. Wagenaar RC, Meijer OG. Effects of stroke rehabilitation, I: a critical review of the literature. J Rehabil Sci. 1991;4:61-73.
13. Ashburn A, Partridge CJ, De Souza L. Physiotherapy in the rehabilitation of stroke: a review. Clin Rehabil. 1993;7:337-345.
14. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981; 4:483-492.
15. Deelman BG, Koning-Haanstra M, Liebrand WBG, van de Burg W. Handleiding van de SAN test. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets en Zeitlinger; 1987.
16. Dick JPR, Guilloff RJ, Stewart A, Blackstock A. Mini-Mental State Examination in neurological patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47:496-499.
17. Wagenaar RC, Meijer OG. Effects of stroke rehabilitation, II: a critical review of the literature. J Rehabil Sci. 1991;4:97-108.
18. Lezak MD. Neurophysiological Assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
19. van Bennekom CA, Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ. Rehabilitation Activities Profile: the ICIDH as a framework for a problem-oriented assessment method in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil. 1995;17:169-175.
20. van Bennekom CA, Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The Rehabilitation Activities Profile: a validation study of its use as a disability index with stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:501-507.
21. Jelles F, van Bennekom CA, Lankhorst GJ, Sibbel CJ, Bouter LM. Inter- and intra-rater agreement of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:407-416.
22. van Bennekom CA, Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. Responsiveness of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile and the Barthel Index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:39-44.
23. Wagenaar RC, Meijer OG, van Wieringen PCW, Kuik DJ, Hazenberg GJ, Lindeboom J, Wichers F, Rijswijk H. The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between Neuro-Developmental Treatment and the Brunnstrom method. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1990;22:1-8.
24. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient, I: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13-31.
25. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1606-1610.
26. De Weerdt W, Harrison MA. Measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients: a comparison of the Brunnstrom-Fugl-Meyer test and the Action Research Arm test. Physiother Canada. 1985;37:65-70.
27. Bronfort G. Efficacy of Manual Therapies of the Spine [PhD thesis]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Thesis Publishers Amsterdam; 1997.
28. Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons; 1990.
29. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, ed. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1980.
30. Yekutiel M, Guttman E. A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56:241-244.
31. Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE. Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:602-611.
32. Dannenbaum RM, Dykes RW. Sensory loss in the hand after sensory stroke: therapeutic rationale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:833-839.
33. Wade DT. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1995.
34. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394-398.
35. Taub E, Crago JE, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 1998;43:152-170.