Continuous passive motion improves shoulder joint integrity following stroke

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 594-599

  Lynch, Daniel ^a   Ferraro, Mark ^a   Krol, Jenifer ^a   Trudell, Christine M ^a   Christos, Paul ^a   Volpe, Bruce T ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM EXERCISE; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTHRALGIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; PARAMETER; PASSIVE MOVEMENT; PILOT STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHOULDER; STROKE;

AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION THERAPY, CONTINUOUS PASSIVE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PARESIS; PILOT PROJECTS; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 24944465759     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr901oa     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Nas K, Gur A, Cevik R, Sarac AJ. The relationship between physical impairment and disability during stroke rehabilitation: effect of cognitive status. Int J Rehabil Res 2004; 27: 181-84.
2. Kirsteins AE, Black-Schaffer RM, Harvey RL. Stroke rehabilitation. 3. Rehabilitation management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: S17-20.
3. Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Robotics in the rehabilitation treatment of patients with stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep, 2002; 4: 270-76.
4. Ada L, Foongchomcheay A, Canning C. Supportive devices for preventing and treating subluxation of the shoulder after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; CD003863.
5. Levine WN, Flatow EL. The pathophysiology of shoulder instability. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28: 910-17.
6. An YH, Friedman RJ. Multidirectional instability of the glenohumeral joint. Orthop Clin North Am 2000; 31: 275-85.
7. Price CI, Pandyan AD. Electrical stimulation for preventing and treating post-stroke shoulder pain: a systematic Cochrane review. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 5-19.
8. Gamble GE, Barberan E, Laasch HU et al. Poststroke shoulder pain: a prospective study of the association and risk factors in 152 patients from a consecutive cohort of 205 patients presenting with stroke. Eur J Pain 2002; 6: 467-74.
9. Black-Schaffer RM, Kirsteins AE, Harvey RL. Stroke rehabilitation. 2. Co-morbidities and complications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80 (suppl 1): S8-16.
10. Paci M. Physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept for adults with post-stroke hemiplegia: a review of effectiveness studies. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 2-7.
11. Lo SF, Chen SY, Lin HC, Jim YF, Meng NH, Kao MJ. Arthrographic and clinical findings in patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1786-91.
12. McLean DE. Medical complications experienced by a cohort of stroke survivors during inpatient, tertiary-level stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 466-69.
13. Walsh K. Management of shoulder pain in patients with stroke. Postgrad Med J 2001; 77: 645-49.
14. O'Driscoll SW, Giori NJ. Continuous passive motion (CPM): theory and principles of clinical application. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000; 37: 179-88.
15. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13-31.
16. Hislop H, Montgomery J, Connelly B, Daniels L. Daniels & Worthingham's muscle testing: techniques of manual examination, seventh edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co., 1995: 437.
17. John J. Grading of muscle power: comparison of MRC and analogue scales by physiotherapists. Medical Research Council. Int J Rehabil Res 1984; 7: 173-81.
18. Ferraro M, Demaio JH, Krol J et al. Assessing the motor status score: a scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 283-89.
19. Gerber C, Ganz R. Clinical assessment of instability of the shoulder. With special reference to anterior and posterior drawer tests. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984; 66: 551-56.
20. Ellenbecker TS, Mattalino AJ, Elam E, Caplinger R. Quantification of anterior translation of the humeral head in the throwing shoulder. Manual assessment versus stress radiography. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28: 161-67.
21. Yoldas EA, Faber KJ, Hawkins RJ. Translation of the glenohumeral joint in patients with multidirectional and posterior instability: awake examination versus examination under anesthesia. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 416-20.
22. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 206-207.
23. Lewis GN, Byblow WD, Carson RG. Phasic modulation of corticomotor excitability during passive movement of the upper limb: effects of movement frequency and muscle specificity. Brain Res 2001; 900: 282-94.
24. Lewis GN, Byblow WD. Modulations in corticomotor excitability during passive upper-limb movement: is there a cortical influence? Brain Res 2002; 943: 263-75.
25. Lewis GN, Byblow WD. A method to monitor corticomotor excitability during passive rhythmic movement of the upper limb. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc 2001; 8: 82-87.
26. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Is robotic training for post-stroke rehabilitation realistic? Curr Opin Neurol 2001; 14: 745-52.