Spoken syntax: The phonetics of giving a hand in New Zealand English

Linguistic Review

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 321-349

  Hay, Jennifer ^a   Bresnan, Joan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750819931     PISSN: 01676318     EISSN: 16133676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/TLR.2006.013     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Anttila, Arto and Vivienne Fong (2004), Variation, ambiguity and noun classes in English. Lingua 114: 1253-1290.
2. Bayley, Robert (2002). The quantitative paradigm. In Language Variation and Change, J.K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), 116-141. Mass.: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
3. Bock, Kathryn (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18: 355-387.
4. - (1989). Closed class immanence in sentence production. Cognition 31: 163-186.
5. Bock. Kathryn and Helga Loebell (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition 31: 1-39.
6. Bod, Rens (1998). Beyond Grammar: An Experience-Based Theory of Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
7. - (2000). The storage vs. computation of three-word sentences. In Proceedings of AMLaP 2000.
8. - (2001). Sentence memory: the storage vs. computation of frequent sentences. In Proceedings CUNY-2001 Conference on Sentence Processing. Philadelphia, PA.
9. Bod, Rens and Ronald Kaplan (2003). A data-oriented parsing model for lexical-functional grammar. In Data-Oriented Parsing, Rens Bod, Remko Scha and Khalil Sima'an (eds.), 211-232. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
10. Bod, Rens, Remko Scha and Khalil Sima'an (eds.) (2003). Data-Oriented Parsing. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
11. Boersma, Paul (2004). A stochastic OT account of paralinguistic tasks such as grammaticality and prototypicality judgments. On-line, Rutgers Optimality Archive.
12. Boersma, Paul and Bruce Hayes (2001). Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 45-86.
13. Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering and A. A. Cleland (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition 75: B13-B25.
14. Bresnan, Joan (2001). Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina and Harald Baayen (in press). Predicting the dative alternation. In Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, G. Bouma, I. Krämer, J. Zwarts (eds.). Amsterdam: KNAW.
16. Bresnan, Joan and Jennifer Hay (2006). Gradient grammar: The effect of animacy on the syntax of give in varieties of English. Manuscript.
17. Bresnan, Joan and Tatiana Nikitina (2003). On the gradience of the dative alternation. Stanford University: http://www-lfg.stanford.edu/bresnan/download. html.
18. Bush, Nathan (2001). Frequency effects and word-boundary palatization in English. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Joan Bybee and Paul J. Hopper (eds.), 255-280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Bybee, Joan (2000a). Lexicalization of sound change and alternating environments. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5. Michael Broe and Janet Pierrehumbert (eds.), 250-268. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. - (2000b). Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. Manuscript.
21. - (2002). Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14: 261-90.
22. Bybee, Joan L. and Joanne Scheibman (1999). The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don't in English. Linguistics 37: 575-596.
23. Cattell, Ray (1984). Syntax and Semantics: Composite Predicates in English, vol. 17. Sydney: Academic Press.
24. Chang, Franklin, Gary S. Dell and Kathryn Bock (in press). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review.
25. Cheshire. Jenny (1987). Syntactic variation, the linguistic variable and sociolinguistic theory. Linguistics 25:251-282.
26. Cutting, J. Cooper and Kathryn Bock (1997). That's the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends. Memory and Cognition 25: 57-71.
27. Drager. Katie (2006). From bad to bed: The relationship between perceived age and vowel perception in New Zealand English. Te Reo 48: 55-68.
28. Ellis. Nick (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 143-88.
29. Eulitz, Carsten and Aditi Lahiri (2004). Neurobiological evidence for abstract phonological representations in the mental lexicon during speech recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 577-583.
30. Ferreira, Victor S. (1996). Is it better to give than to donate? syntactic flexibility in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 724-755.
31. Fidelholz, James (1975). Word frequency and vowel reduction in English. In Papers from the 75th meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 200-213. University of Chicago.
32. Flores D'Arcais, Giovanni B. (1993). The comprehension and semantic interpretation of idioms. In Idioms: Processing, Structure and Interpretation, C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi (eds.), 79-98. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Foulkes, Paul and Gerry Docherty (to appear). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics.
34. Gahl, Susanne and Susan M. Garnsey (2004). Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation change. Language 80: 748-775.
35. Goldberg. Adele (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Goldwater, Sharon and Mark Johnson (2003). Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model. In Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on Variation within Optimality Theory, Jennifer Spenader, Anders Eriksson, and Östen Dahl (eds.). 111-120. Stockholm University, Stockholm.
37. Gordon. Elizabeth, Lyle Campbell, Jennifer Hay, Margaret Maclagan, Andrea Sudbury, and Peter Trudgill (2004). New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Gordon, Elizabeth, Margaret Maclagan and Jennifer Hay (in press). The ONZE corpus. In Models and Methods in the Handling of Unconventional Digital Corpora. Volume 2: Diachronic Corpora, Joan C. Beal. Karen P. Corrigan, and Hermann Moisl (eds.). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave.
39. Gregory, Michelle, William Raymond, Eric Fosler-Lussier and Dan Jurafsky (2000). The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. In Proceedings of the 35th Chicago Linguistic Society 1999, 151-166. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
40. Hawkins, Sarah (2003). Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics 31: 373-105.
41. Hawkins, Sarah and Paul Warren (1994). Phonetic influences on the intelligibility of conversational speech. Journal of Phonetics 22: 493-511.
42. Hay, Jennifer (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics 39: 1041-1070.
43. - (2003). Causes and Consequences of Word Structure. New York and London: Routledge.
44. Hay, Jennifer, Norma Mendoza-Denton and Stefanie Jannedy (1999). Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design, and style. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1389-1392. San Francisco.
45. Hay, Jennifer and Andrea Sudbury (2005). How rhoticity became /r/-sandhi. Language 81: 799-823.
46. Hay, Jennifer, Paul Warren and Katie Drager (to appear). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics.
47. Hintzman, Douglas L. (1986). Schema abstraction in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 93: 411-128.
48. Hooper, Joan B. (1976). Word frequency in lexical diffusion and the source of morphophonological change. In Current Progress in Historical Linguistics, W. Christie (ed.), 96-105. Amsterdam: North Holland.
49. Jackendoff, Ray (2002). Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Jäger, Gerhard (in press). Maximum entropy models and stochastic optimality theory. In Architectures, Rules, and Preferences: A Festschrifi for Joan Bresnan, Jane Grimshaw, Joan Maling, Chris Manning, Jane Simpson and Annie Zaenen (eds.). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
51. Jäger, Gerhard and Anette Rosenbach (to appear). The winner takes it all - almost. Linguistics.
52. Johnson, Keith (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization. In Talker Variability in Speech Processing, Keith Johnson and John Mullenix (eds.), 146-165. San Diego: Academic Press.
53. - (to appear). Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics.
54. Johnson, Keith, Elizabeth Strand and Marianna D'Imperio (1999). Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics 24: 359-384.
55. Jurafsky, Dan (2003). Probabilistic modeling in psycholinguistics: Linguistic comprehension and production. In Probabilistic Linguistics, Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay and Stefanie Jannedy (eds.), 39-95. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.
56. Jurafsky, Daniel, Alan Bell, Michelle Gregory and William D. Raymond (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, Joan L. Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds.), 229-254. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
57. Kelly, Michael (1988). Rhythmic alternation and lexical stress differences in English. Cognition 30: 107-137.
58. - (1992). Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review 99: 349-364.
59. Klatt, D. H. (1979). Speech perception: A model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. Journal of Phonetics 7: 279-312.
60. Krug, Manfred (1998). String frequency: A cognitive motivating factor in coalescence, language processing and linguistic change. Journal of English Linguistics 26: 286-320.
61. Labov, William (1969). Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45:715-62.
62. - (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Cambridge. MA: Blackwell.
63. Lahiri, Aditi and William D. Marslen-Wilson (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition 38: 245-294.
64. Langacker, Ronald (1998). Conceptualization, symbolization and grammar. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 1-39. Mahwah, New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum.
65. Langstrof, Christian (2003), The short front vowels in New Zealand English in the Intermediate period. New Zealand English Journal 17: 4-16.
66. - (2006). Acoustic evidence for a push-chain shift in the Intermediate period of New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 18 (2): 141-164.
67. Levelt, Pim (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68. Levelt, Willem J. and Stephanie Kelter (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology 14: 78-106.
69. Lieberman. Philip (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatic context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech 6: 172-187.
70. Macaulay, Ronald (1991). Locating Dialect in Discourse: The Language of Honest Men and Bonnie Lasses in Ayr. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Maclagan, Margaret and Jennifer Hay (forthcoming). Getting fed up with our feet. Contrast maintenance and the New Zealand English 'short' front vowel shift. Language Variation and Change 19: 1-25.
72. Manning, Christopher (2003). Probabilistic syntax. In Probabilistic Linguistics, Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay and Stefanie Jannedy (eds.), 289-341. MA: MIT Press.
73. Marslen-Wilson, William D. and Paul Warren (1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access. Psychological Review 101: 653-675.
74. Medin, Douglas and Marguerite M. Schaffer (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review 85: 207-238.
75. Mendoza-Denton, Norma, Jennifer Hay and Stefanie Jannedy (2003). Probabilistic sociolinguistics: Beyond variable rules. In Probabilistic Linguistics, Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay, and Stefanie Jannedy (eds.). 97-138. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.
76. Niedzielski, Nancy A. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Social Psychology (Special Edition) 18: 62-85.
77. Nooteboom, Sieb G. (1999). Sloppiness in uttering stock phrases. In Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, J. J. Ohala, D. Granville and A. C. Bailey (eds.), 683-687. San Francisco: IcPhS.
78. Nosofsky, Robert M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13: 87-108.
79. Pickering, Martin J. and Holly P. Branigan (1999). Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 136-140.
80. Pierrehumbert, Janet (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, Joan L. Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds.), 137-157. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Downloadable from http://www.ling.nwu.edu/~jbp).
81. - (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In Laboratory Phonology 7, Carlos Gussenhoven and Natasha Warner (eds.), 250-268. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
82. Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Beth Levin (1998). Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt and W. Geuder (eds.), 97-134. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
83. Rickford, John and Faye McNair-Knox (1994). Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, D. Biber and E. Finegan (eds.), 235-276. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
84. Scheepers, Christoph (2003). Syntactic primining of relative clause attachments: persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition 89: 179-205.
85. Schenkein, James (1980). A taxonomy for repeating action sequences in natural conversation. In Language Production (vol. 1), B. Butterworth (ed.), 21-47. London: Academic Press.
86. Schmitt, Norbert (ed.) (2004). Formulaic Sequences. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
87. Smith, Eliot R. and Michael A. Zarate (1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychological Review 99: 3-21.
88. Smith, Neil and Annabel Cormack (2002). Parametric poverty. Glot International 6: 285-287.
89. Sosa, Anna V. and James MacFarlane (2002). Evidence for frequency-based constituents in the mental lexicon: Collocations involving the word of. Brain and Language 83: 227-236.
90. Strand, Elizabeth (1999). Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Social Psychology (Special Edition) 18: 86-99.
91. Tannen, Deborah (1989). Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. Tomasello, Michael (2006). Acquiring linguistic constructions. In Handbook of Child Psychology: Cognition, Perception and Language, Robert Siegler and Deanna Kuhn (eds.), 255-298. New York: Wiley Publishers.
93. Underwood, Geoffrey, Norbert Schmitt and Adam Galpin (2004). The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In Formulaic Sequences, Norbert Schmitt (ed.), 153-172. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
94. Van Lancker, Diana, Gerald Canter and Dale Terbeek (1981). Disambiguation of ditropic sentences: Acoustic and phonetic cues. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24: 330-335.
95. Van Lancker-Sidtis, Diana (2003). Auditory recognition of idioms by native and nonnative speakers of English: It takes one to know one. Applied Psycholinguistics 24: 45-57.
96. Walker, Abby (2005). Well, when you say it: The effect of speaker identity on the grammaticality ratings of morpho-syntactic constructions in New Zealand English. Honors extended essay, University of Canterbury.
97. Warren, Paul, Jennifer Hay and Brynmor Thomas (in press). The loci of sound change effects in recognition and perception. In Laboratory Phonology 9, Jose Hualde and Jennifer Cole (eds.). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
98. Yaeger-Dror, Malcah (1994). Sound change in Montreal French. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology 3: Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form, Patricia Keating (ed.). 267-292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99. Yaeger-Dror, Malcah and William Kemp (1992). Lexical classes in Montreal French (e:). Language and Speech 35: 251-293.
100. Yang, Charles D. (2004). Universal Grammar, statistics, or both? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 451-456.