How rhoticity became /r/-sandhi

Language

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 799-823

  Hay, Jennifer ^a   Sudbury, Andrea ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750812832     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2005.0175     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. ANTTILA, ARTO, and YOUNG-MEE YU CHO. 1998, Variation and change in optimally theory. Lingua 104.31-56.
2. BAAYEN, R. HARALD; RICHARD PIEPENBROCK; and L. GULIKERS. 1995. The CELEX lexical database (release 2) CD-ROM. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. BAILEY, GUY. 2001. Real and apparent time. The handbook of language variation and change, ed. by Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes, 312-32. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. BAILEY, GUY; TOM WIKLE; JAN TILLERY; and LORI SAND. 1991. The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change 3.241-64.
5. BAILEY, RICHARD. 1996. Nineteenth century English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6. BAUER, LAURIE. 1984. Linking /r/ in RP: Some facts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 14.74-79.
7. BAYARD, DONN. 1990. Minder, Mork and Mindy? (-t) glottalization and non-prevocalic (-r) in younger New Zealand speakers. New Zealand ways of speaking English, ed. by Allan Bell and Janet Holmes, 149-64. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
8. BAYLEY, ROBERT. 2002. The quantitative paradigm. The handbook of language variation and change, ed. by Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes. 117-41. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. BELICH, JAMES. 1996. Making peoples: A history of the New Zealanders. Auckland: Penguin.
10. BERTRAM, RAYMOND; ROBERT SCHREUDER; and R. HARALD BAAYEN. 2000. The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type. affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Memory, Learning and Cognition 26.419-511.
11. BROWN, ADAM. 1988. Linking, intrusive, and rhotic /r/ in pronunciation models. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 18.144-51.
12. BYBEE, JOAN. 2000. Lexicalization of sound change and alternating environments. Papers in laboratory phonology 5, ed. by Michael Broe and Janet Pierrehumbert, 250-68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. BYBEE, JOAN. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14.261-90.
14. CEDERGREN, HENRIETTA. 1973. The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.
15. CRYSTAL, DAVID. 1984. Should intruders keep out? Who cares about English usage?, ed. by David Crystal, 36-44. London: Penguin.
16. DOCHERTY, GERARD, and PAUL FOULKES. 1999. Derby and Newcastle: Instrumental phonetics and variationist studies. In Foulkes & Docherty, 47-71.
17. DONEGAN, PATRICIA. 1993. On the phonetic basis of phonological change. Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, ed. by Charles Jones, 98-130. London: Longman.
18. DRAGER, KATIE. 2006. From bad to bed: An investigation of vowel perception in New Zealand English. Te Reo, to appear.
19. ELLIS, ALEXANDER J. 1889. On early English pronunciation 5. London: Trübner and Co.
20. FOULKES, PAUL. 1997a. Rule inversion in a British English dialect: A sociolinguistic investigation of [r]-sandhi in Newcastle upon Tyne. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4.1.259-70.
21. FOULKES, PAUL. 1997b. English [r]-sandhi: A sociolinguistic perspective. Histoire Epistemologie, Langage 19.73-96.
22. FOULKES, PAUL, and GERALD DOCHERTY (eds.) 1999. Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles. London: Longman.
23. FOX, ANTHONY. 1978. To 'r' is human? Intrusive remarks on a recent controversy. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 8.72-74.
24. GICK, BRYAN. 1999. A gesture-based account of intrusive consonants in English. Phonology 16.29-54.
25. GIEGERICH, HEINZ. 1999. Lexical strata in English: Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. GIMSON, ALFRED CHARLES. 1980. An introduction to the pronunciation of English. 3rd edn. London: Arnold.
27. GIMSON, ALFRED CHARLES, and ALAN CRUTTENDEN. 1994. An introduction to the pronunciation of English. 5th edn. London: Arnold.
28. GORDON, ELIZABETH. 2001. Looking for the origins of the New Zealand accent. New Zealand Sociology 16.1.93-107.
29. GORDON, ELIZABETH; LYLE CAMPBELL; JENNIFER HAY; MARGARET MACLAGAN; ANDREA SUDBURY; and PETER TRUDGILL. 2004. New Zealand English: Its origins and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. GORDON, ELIZABETH; MARGARET MACLAGAN; and JENNIFER HAY. 2006. The ONZE Corpus. Using unconventional digital language corpora, ed. by Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan, and Hermann Moisl. Houndsmills: Palgrave, to appear.
31. HARRIS, JOHN. 1994. English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. HAWKINS, SARAH. 2003. Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics 31.373-405.
33. HAY, JENNIFER. 2000. How-/r/-interesting: Intrusive /r/ after /au/ in New Zealand English. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 30, Raleigh, North Carolina State University.
34. HAY, JENNIFER. 2003. Causes and consequences of word structure. London: Routledge.
35. HAY, JENNIFER; STEFANIE JANNEDY; and NORMA MENDOZA-DENTON. 1999. Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design and style. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, 1389-92.
36. HAY, JENNIFER; NORMA MENDOZA- DENTON; and STEFANIE JANNEDY. 2000. Style and economy: When frequency effects collide. Paper presented at the 7th New Zealand Language and Society Conference, Auckland, June 2000.
37. HAY, JENNIFER, and PAUL WARREN. 2002. Experiments on /r/-intrusion. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 14.47-58.
38. HAY, JENNIFER; PAUL WARREN; and KATIE DRAGER. 2006. Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics, to appear.
39. JOHANSSON, STIG. 1973. Linking and intrusive /r/ in English: A case for a more concrete phonology. Studia Linguistica 27.53-68.
40. JOHNSON, KEITH. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization. Talker variability in speech processing, ed. by Keith Johnson and John W. Mullennix, 145-66. New York: Academic Press.
41. JONES, DANIEL. 1964. An outline of English phonetics. 9th edn. Cambridge: Heffer and Sons.
42. JOSEPH, BRIAN D. 1999. Utterance-finality - Framing the issues. Proceedings of LP'98, vol. 1, ed. by Osamu Fujimura, Brian D. Joseph, and Bohumil Palek, 3-14. Prague: The Karolinum Press.
43. KURATH, HANS, and GUY S. LOWMAN. 1970. The dialectal structure of southern England. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
44. LABOV, WILLIAM. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
45. LABOV, WILLIAM. 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2.205-54.
46. LASS, ROGER. 1987. The shape of English. London: Dent & Sons.
47. LASS, ROGER. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. LEWIS, GILLIAN. 1996. The origins of New Zealand English: A report on work in progress. New Zealand English Journal 10.25-30.
49. LEWIS, J. WINDSOR. 1975. Linking /r/ in the general British pronunciation of English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 5.37-42.
50. LEWIS, J. WINDSOR. 1977. The r-link business - A reply. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 7.28-31.
51. MCCARTHY, JOHN. 1991. Synchronic rule inversion. Berkeley Linguistics Society 17.192-207.
52. MCCARTHY, JOHN. 1993. A case of surface constraint violation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38.169-95.
53. MACMAHON, MICHAEL K. C. 1983. Thomas Hallam and the study of dialect and educated speech. Transactions of the Yorkshire Dialect Society 83.19-31.
54. MCMAHON, APRIL. 2000a. Lexical phonology and the history of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. MCMAHON, APRIL. 2000b. Change, chance and optimality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. MCMAHON, APRIL; PAUL FOULKES; and LAURA TOLLFREE. 1994. Gestural representation and lexical phonology. Phonology 11.227-316.
57. MENDOZA-DENTON, NORMA; JENNIFER HAY; and STEFANIE JANNEDY. 2003. Probabilistic sociolinguistics: Beyond variable rules. Probabilistic linguistics, ed. by Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay, and Stefanie Jannedy, 97-138. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. PETERSON, GORDON E., and HAROLD BARNEY. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22.369-81.
59. PIERREHUMBERT, JANET. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. Laboratory phonology 7, ed. by Carlos Gussenhoven and Natasha Warner, 101-39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
60. PITT, MARK, and KEITH JOHNSON. 2003. Using pronunciation data as a starting point in modelling word recognition. Paper presented at the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona.
61. PRING, JULIAN T. 1976 More thoughts on the /r/-link business. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 6.92-95.
62. SCOBBIE, JAMES. 1992. Against rule inversion: The development of English [r]-sandhi. Poster presented at the 7th International Phonology Meeting, Krems, Austria.
63. SERENO, JOAN and ALLARD JONGMAN. 1997. Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition 25.4.425-37.
64. STEVENS, KENNETH. 1998. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. SUDBURY, ANDREA, and JENNIFER HAY. 2002a. The fall and rise of /r/: Rhoticity and /r/-sandhi in early New Zealand English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Selected papers from NWAV 30 8.3.281-95.
66. SUDBURY, ANDREA, and JENNIFER HAY. 2002b. The demise of non-prevocalic /r/ in early New Zealand English. Paper presented at R-atics 2, Brussels, Belgium.
67. TOLLFREE, LAURA. 1999. South-east London English: Discrete versus continuous modelling of consonantal reduction. In Foulkes & Docherty, 163-84.
68. TRUDGILL, PETER. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. TRUDGILL, PETER. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
70. TRUDGILL, PETER. 1999. A window on the past: 'Colonial lag' and New Zealand evidence for the phonology of nineteenth century English. American Speech 74.2.27-39.
71. TRUDGILL, PETER; ELIZABETH GORDON; GILLIAN LEWIS; and MARGARET MACLAGAN. 2000a. The role of drift in the formation of native-speaker Southern Hemisphere Englishes: Some New Zealand evidence. Diachronica 17.1.111-38.
72. TRUDGILL, PETER; ELIZABETH GORDON; GILLIAN LEWIS; and MARGARET MACLAGAN. 2000b. Determinism in new dialect formation and the genesis of New Zealand English. Journal of Linguistics 36.299-318.
73. TRUDGILL, PETER, and JEAN HANNAH. 1982. International English: A guide to varieties of Standard English. London: Arnold.
74. VENNEMANN, THEO. 1972. Rule inversion. Lingua 29.209-42.
75. WARREN, PAUL; JENNIFER HAY; and BRYNMOR THOMAS. 2004. The loci of sound change effects in recognition and perception. Proceedings of Laboratory Phonology 9. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, to appear.
76. WATT, DOMINIC, and LESLEY MILROY. 1999. Patterns of variation in three Newcastle vowels: Is this dialect levelling? In Foulkes & Docherty, 25-46.
77. WELLS, JOHN C. 1982. Accents of English. (3 vols.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. WILLIAMS, ANN, and PAUL KERSWILL. 1999. Dialect levelling: Change and continuity in Milton Keynes, Reading and Hull. In Foulkes & Docherty, 141-62.
79. WOODS, NICOLA. 1997. The formation and development of New Zealand English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1.95-125.
80. YAEGER-DROR, MALCAH. 1996. Phonetic evidence for the evolution of lexical classes: The case of a Montreal French vowel shift. Towards a social science of language, ed. by Gregory Guy, Crawford Feagin, John Baugh, and Deborah Schiffrin, 263-87. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
81. YAEGER-DROR, MALCAH, and WILLIAM KEMP. 1992. Lexical classes in Montreal French. Language and Speech 35.251-93.