Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: Effects of semantic encoding and divided attention

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 986-998

  Lozito, Jeffrey P ^a   Mulligan, Neil W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MENTAL CONCENTRATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; RECALL; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SEMANTICS; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 33750814591     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193246     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. ANDERSON, N. D., CRAIK, F. I. M., & NAVEH-BENJAMN, M. (1998). The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: I. Evidence from divided attention costs. Psychology & Aging, 13, 405-423.
2. BADDELEY, A., LEWIS, V., ELDRIDGE, M., & THOMSON, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 518-540.
3. BROADBENT, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
4. CASTEL, A. D., & CRAIK, F. I. M. (2003). The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information. Psychology & Aging, 18, 873-885.
5. CHERRY, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 554-559.
6. CRAIK, F. I. M., GOVONI, R., NAVEH-BENJAMN, M., & ANDERSON, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159-180.
7. CRAIK, F. I. M., & LOCKHART, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
8. CRAIK, F. I. M., & TULVING, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
9. DEWHURST, S. A., & ANDERSON, S. J. (1999). Effects of exact and category repetition in true and false recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 27, 665-673.
10. DODSON, C. S., & JOHNSON, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194.
11. FERNANDES, M. A., & MOSCOVITCH, M. (2000). Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 155-176.
12. FERNANDES, M. A., & MOSCOVITCH, M. (2002). Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words. Memory & Cognition, 30, 731-744.
13. FERNANDES, M. A., & MOSCOVITCH, M. (2003). Interference effects from divided attention during retrieval in younger and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 18, 219-230.
14. GARDINER, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309-313.
15. GARDINER, J. M., JAVA, R. I., & RICHARDSON-KLAVEHN, A. (1996). How level of processing really influences awareness in recognition memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 114-122.
16. GARDINER, J. M., & RICHARDSON-KLAVEHN, A. (2000). Remembering and knowing. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Handbook of memory (pp. 229-244). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. GRUPPUSO, V., LINDSAY, D. S., & KELLEY, C. M. (1997). The process-dissociation procedure and similarity: Defining and estimating recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 259-278.
18. HICKS, J. L., & MARSH, R. L. (2000). Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1483-1498.
19. IIDAKA, T., ANDERSON, N. D., KAPUR, S., CABEZA, R., & CRAIK, F. I. M. (2000). The effect of divided attention on encoding and retrieval in episodic memory revealed by positron emission tomography. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 267-280.
20. JACOBY, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 21-38.
21. JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541.
22. JACOBY, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 3-22.
23. JACOBY, L. L., JONES, T. C., & DOLAN, P. O. (1998). Two effects of repetition: Support for a dual-process model of know judgments and exclusion errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 705-709.
24. JAMES, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
25. JOHNSON, M. K., HASHTROUDI, S., & LINDSAY, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
26. JOHNSTON, W. A., GREENBERG, S. N., FISHER, R. P., & MARTIN, D. W. (1970). Divided attention: A vehicle for monitoring memory processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 83, 164-171.
27. KOLERS, P. A., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1984). Procedures of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 425-449.
28. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
29. MARTIN, D. W. (1970). Residual processing capacity during verbal organization in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9, 391-397.
30. MORRIS, C. D., BRANSFORD, J. D., & FRANKS, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
31. MULLIGAN, N. W. (1998). The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 27-47.
32. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2002). The effects of generation on conceptual implicit memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 327-342.
33. MULLIGAN, N. W. (2004). Generation and memory for contextual detail. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 838-855.
34. MULLIGAN, N. W., GUYER, P. S., & BELAND, A. (1999). The effects of levels-of-processing and organization on conceptual implicit memory in the category exemplar production test. Memory & Cognition, 27, 633-647.
35. MULLIGAN, N. W., & HIRSHMAN, E. (1997). Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 280-304.
36. MURDOCK, B. B., JR. (1965). Effects of a subsidiary task on short-term memory. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 413-419.
37. NAVEH-BENJAMIN, M., CRAIK, F. I. M., GAVRILESCU, D., & ANDERSON, N. D. (2000). Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis. Memory & Cognition, 28, 965-976.
38. NAVEH-BENJAMIN, M., CRAIK, F. I. M., GUEZ, J., & DORI, H. (1998). Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: Further support for an asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1091-1104.
39. NAVEH-BENJAMIN, M., CRAIK, F. I. M., PERRETTA, J. G., & TONEV, S. T. (2000). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: The resiliency of retrieval processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 609-625.
40. NAVEH-BENJAMIN, M., & GUEZ, J. (2000). Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: Assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1461-1482.
41. NORMAN, D. A. (1969). Memory and attention: An introduction to human information processing. New York: Wiley.
42. PARK, D. C., SMITH, A. D., DUDLEY, W. N., & LAFRONZA, V. N. (1989). Effects of age and a divided attention task presented during encoding and retrieval on memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1185-1191.
43. PARKIN, A. J., GARDINER, J. M., & ROSSER, R. (1995). Functional aspects of recollective experience in face recognition. Consciousness & Cognition, 4, 387-398.
44. PARKIN, A. J., & RUSSO, R. (1993). On the origin of functional differences in recollective experience. Memory, 1, 231-237.
45. RAJARAM, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89-102.
46. ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
47. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & MCDERMOTT, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 63-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
48. SLAMECKA, N. J., & GRAF, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592-604.
49. TROYER, A. K., & CRAIK, F. I. M. (2000). The effect of divided attention on memory for items and their context. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 161-171.
50. TROYER, A. K., WINOCUR, G., CRAIK, F. I. M., & MOSCOVITCH, M. (1999). Source memory and divided attention: Reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks. Neuropsychology, 13, 467-474.
51. TRUMBO, D., & MILONE, F. (1971). Primary task performance as a function of encoding, retention, and recall in a secondary task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 273-279.
52. YONELINAS, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 441-517.