Generation and memory for contextual detail

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 838-855

  Mulligan, Neil W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MEMORY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

CUES; HUMANS; MEMORY; VOCABULARY;

EID: 3042625834     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.838     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
2. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80(3, Pt. 2).
3. Begg, I., Snider, A., Foley, F., & Goddard, R. (1989). The generation effect is no artifact: Generating makes words distinctive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 977-989.
4. Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 657-668.
5. Brown, A. S., Jones, E. M., & Davis, T. L. (1995). Age differences in conversational source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 10, 111-122.
6. Burns, D. J. (1990). The generation effect: A test between single- and multifactor theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1060-1067.
7. Burns, D. J. (1992). The consequences of generation. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 615-633.
8. Burns, D. J. (1996). The item-order distinction and the generation effect: The importance of order information in long-term memory. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 567-580.
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. deWinstanley, P. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1997). Processing instructions and the generation effect: A test of the multifactor transfer-appropriate processing theory. Memory, 5, 401-421.
11. Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309-313.
12. Greene, R. L. (1992). Human memory: Paradigms and paradoxes. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Greenwald, A. G., & Johnson, M. M. (1989). The generation effect extended: Memory enhancement for generation cues. Memory & Cognition, 17, 673-681.
14. Grosofsky, A., Payne, D. G., & Campbell, K. D. (1994). Does the generation effect depend upon selective displaced rehearsal. American Journal of Psychology, 107, 53-68.
15. Hirshman, E., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 484-494.
16. Hu, X. (1996). Statistical Inference Program for multinomial binary tree models. [Computer software]. Memphis, TN: University of Memphis, Department of Psychology.
17. Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 497-514.
18. Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and dlstinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421-445.
19. Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 485-508.
20. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
21. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
22. Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., & Reeder, J. A. (1994). Time-course studies of reality monitoring and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1409-1419.
23. Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Foley, H. J., & Foley, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 37-64.
24. Jurica, P. J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1999). Monitoring item and source information: Evidence for a negative generation effect in source memory. Memory & Cognition, 27, 648-656.
25. Kelley, M. R., & Nairne, J. S. (2001). von Restorff revisited: Isolation, generation, and memory for order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 54-66.
26. Kinjo, H., & Snodgrass, J. G. (2000). Does the generation effect occur for pictures? American Journal of Psychology, 113, 95-121.
27. Kinoshita, S. (1989). Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect. Memory & Cognition, 17, 563-571.
28. Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Druch, A. (1991). The contextualization of input and output events in memory. Psychological Research, 53, 260-270.
29. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
30. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
31. Marsh, E. J., Edelman, G., & Bower, G. H. (2001). Demonstrations of a generation effect in context memory. Memory & Cognition, 29, 798-805.
32. Masson, M. E. J., & MacLeod, C. M. (1992). Reenacting the route to interpretation: Enhanced perceptual identification without prior perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 145-176.
33. McDaniel, M. A., Wadill, P. J., & Einstein, G. O. (1988). A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 521-536.
34. Mitchell, K. J., & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Source monitoring: Attributing mental experiences. In F. I. M. Craik & E. Tulving (Eds.). Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 179-196). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
35. Mulligan, N. W. (2001). Generation and hypermnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 436-450.
36. Mulligan, N. W. (2002a). The effects of generation on conceptual implicit memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 327-342.
37. Mulligan, N. W. (2002b). The emergent generation effect and hypermnesia: Influences of semantic and nonsemantic generation tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 541-554.
38. Mulligan, N. W. (2002c). The generation effect: Dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 850-861.
39. Nairne, J. S., Reigler, G. L., & Serra, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 702-709.
40. Rabinowitz, J. C. (1989). Judgments of origin and generation effects: Comparisons between young and elderly adults. Psychology and Aging, 4, 259-268.
41. Rabinowitz, J. C. (1990). Effects of repetition of mental operations on memory for occurrence and origin. Memory & Cognition, 18, 72-82.
42. Riefer, D. M., Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). Response strategies in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 680-693.
43. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boiler & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
44. Schmidt, S. R., & Cherry, K. (1989). The negative generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Memory & Cognition, 17, 359-369.
45. Serra, M., & Nairne, J. S. (1993). Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 21, 34-40.
46. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
47. Slamecka, N. J., & Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 589-607.
48. Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context. Psychology and Aging, 10, 527-539.
49. Steffens, M. C., & Erdfelder, E. (1998). Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 705-733.
50. Troyer, A. K., Winocur, G., Craik, F. I. M., & Moscovitch, M. (1999). Source memory and divided attention: Reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks. Neuropsychology, 13, 467-474.
51. Voss, J. F., Vesonder, G. T., Post, T. A., & Ney, L. G. (1987). Was the item recalled and if so by whom? Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 466-479.
52. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.